MILWAUKEE -- Wisconsinites came out in droves on Tuesday to vote in the recall election, with long lines at polling places, large numbers of new voters and reports of turnout near the level of the 2008 presidential election.
"Overwhelming," replied the chief elections inspector at the the polling place for Milwaukee wards 121 and 122, when asked what turnout was like on Tuesday afternoon.
As of 5:13 p.m. Central time, 1,054 people had voted at the Clinton Rose Senior Center in a primarily African American section of northern Milwaukee -- an area that Democrats said they hope will turn out heavily in support of Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett (D), challenging Gov. Scott Walker (R). The chief elections inspector said she estimated the number of voters to be more than the 2008 presidential election.
The longest line at the polling place was for voters who needed to register, either because they had changed addresses or were first-time voters.
Every time a first-time voter registered, a poll worker would shout, "First-time voter!" followed by cheers from the crowd.
Aide Cano, 39, one was one of those first-time voters. She pulled the lever for Barrett, telling The Huffington Post that the election was "very important" to her because she is a public employee who works for the county. Cano received a ride to the polls by a volunteer with JobsNow, who said he had driven 10 people to vote on Tuesday.
Walker earned the ire of many public workers last year, when he pushed through a bill that stripped most collective bargaining rights from public workers. Now he, his lieutenant governor and three GOP state senators are fighting to hold on to their seats in recall elections. Another GOP state senator resigned a few months ago, when it became clear she also would face the recall process. That seat is now vacant, with Democrats and Republicans fighting to gain control of it in Tuesday's election.
The state elections board predicted turnout to be at 60 percent to 65 percent, near the level of presidential elections. In other words, nearly 3 million Wisconsinites could turn out to vote on Tuesday.
At the nearby polling place in wards 123 and 124 in northern Milwaukee, the atmosphere was equally busy. The line was long to register to vote, and as of 4:40 p.m., 890 people had cast ballots. The were so many people that workers ran out of the classic "I Voted" stickers, much to the disappointment of one man who came up and asked for one after he did his civic duty.
The chief elections inspector for those wards said that more than 260 people had registered to vote -- an extremely high number -- and characterized Tuesday's turnout as "crazy."
In another predominantly African American area of northern Milwaukee, 402 people had voted as of 3 p.m. Nearly half of those showing up were registering. The chief elections inspector there also said it was "a lot" of voters for a non-presidential race, noting that sometimes, only 100 people show up to cast ballots.
Elsewhere in the state, reports of turnout were equally high. Dane County Clerk Karen Peters said turnout in the Madison area was "just wild," predicting it could hit up to 80 percent to 88 percent of the population.
Patch reported that in the Milwaukee suburbs, turnout appeared to be higher than the expected 60 percent to 65 percent range.
Election officials in the city of Racine, a Democratic stronghold, had to ask neighboring villages for extra ballots. With turnout higher than expected, officials realized they could run out of ballots and quickly worked to find a solution.
The day was not without its problems. Election Protection, a nonpartisan voter protection group, said it received 594 calls as of 1 p.m., including "polling place inquiries, questions about residency requirements needed for Election Day registration, poll workers improperly asking voters to present ID in order to vote, and deceptive robocalls suggesting voters that who signed petitions or voted in earlier elections did not have to vote today."
Below, more on the history of the Walker recall effort:
Wave Election Sweeps In Conservatives
1 of 11
FIRST SLIDE
PREVIOUS SLIDE
NEXT SLIDESHOW
In 2010, a surge of Tea Party momentum and backlash against Democrats helped elect conservatives including Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who became the state's first Republican governor since 2002.
Walker promised to cut taxes and create 250,000 new jobs, but a deeper look into his past also showed a politician who had inflamed tensions with unions before.
The Washington Postreports on his time as Milwaukee County Executive, during which the collective bargaining rights of unions already appeared to be one of his most ambitious targets:
During his eight-year tenure in Milwaukee County, Walker never raised property taxes. He cut the county workforce by 20 percent, improved its bond rating and gave back hundreds of thousands of dollars of his own salary as part of the effort to trim spending. But he also saw his relations with local unions deteriorate.
Union leaders say Walker never negotiated in good faith and had a singular solution to every budget problem: cut. Under his watch, the county privatized public jobs, laid off workers and placed others on furlough.
[...]
Walker argued that collective bargaining was the biggest hurdle to balancing the budget and that unions had little incentive to give ground because they almost always prevailed in arbitration. He said that the cuts he proposed were intended to prevent layoffs and accused union leaders of being uninterested in compromise.
Walker promised to cut taxes and create 250,000 new jobs, but a deeper look into his past also showed a politician who had inflamed tensions with unions before.
The Washington Postreports on his time as Milwaukee County Executive, during which the collective bargaining rights of unions already appeared to be one of his most ambitious targets:
During his eight-year tenure in Milwaukee County, Walker never raised property taxes. He cut the county workforce by 20 percent, improved its bond rating and gave back hundreds of thousands of dollars of his own salary as part of the effort to trim spending. But he also saw his relations with local unions deteriorate.
Union leaders say Walker never negotiated in good faith and had a singular solution to every budget problem: cut. Under his watch, the county privatized public jobs, laid off workers and placed others on furlough.
[...]
Walker argued that collective bargaining was the biggest hurdle to balancing the budget and that unions had little incentive to give ground because they almost always prevailed in arbitration. He said that the cuts he proposed were intended to prevent layoffs and accused union leaders of being uninterested in compromise.
Wave Election Sweeps In Conservatives
1
/ 11
SHARE THIS SLIDE
In 2010, a surge of Tea Party momentum and backlash against Democrats helped elect conservatives including Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who became the state's first Republican governor since 2002.
Walker promised to cut taxes and create 250,000 new jobs, but a deeper look into his past also showed a politician who had inflamed tensions with unions before.
The Washington Postreports on his time as Milwaukee County Executive, during which the collective bargaining rights of unions already appeared to be one of his most ambitious targets:
During his eight-year tenure in Milwaukee County, Walker never raised property taxes. He cut the county workforce by 20 percent, improved its bond rating and gave back hundreds of thousands of dollars of his own salary as part of the effort to trim spending. But he also saw his relations with local unions deteriorate.
Union leaders say Walker never negotiated in good faith and had a singular solution to every budget problem: cut. Under his watch, the county privatized public jobs, laid off workers and placed others on furlough.
[...]
Walker argued that collective bargaining was the biggest hurdle to balancing the budget and that unions had little incentive to give ground because they almost always prevailed in arbitration. He said that the cuts he proposed were intended to prevent layoffs and accused union leaders of being uninterested in compromise.
MILWAUKEE -- Wisconsinites came out in droves on Tuesday to vote in the recall election, with long lines at polling places, large numbers of new voters and reports of turnout near the level of the 200...
MILWAUKEE -- Wisconsinites came out in droves on Tuesday to vote in the recall election, with long lines at polling places, large numbers of new voters and reports of turnout near the level of the 200...
WASHINGTON -- The final round of polls on Tuesday's Wisconsin recall election are something of a puzzle, although the uncertainty is more about the margin...
Putting off worries about the future and the massive amount of work ahead, thousands of recall volunteers prepared to party tonight at Frank Lloyd Wright's Monona Terrace, the site of Scott Walker's 2010 inaugural.
When characters such as the Koch brothers, and their ruthless efforts to take political power away from working people, are so commonplace that Stephen Colbert can run a whole segment mocking them, things are changing.
The large voter turnout was, perhaps, the only good result of this election. I like the fact that democracy worked, however, one can't get past the effect of a 7-1 spending disparity favoring Walker. Even though voters voted, I still feel somehow as if this election was purchased.
Karl_Hildebrand: The large voter turnout was, perhaps, the only good result
Agree. It's impossible for this vote to not have been influenced by the money spent. Is that how the majority of people really want the democratic process to be: determined by the most money spent?
The party that represents the poor will always lose if that's the case. That has long term implications for everyone, and by the time the supporters of this outcome realize what they've done, it will be too late.
stevec2nd: Agree. It's impossible for this vote to not have been
In California, where before the deluge somebody was smart, they have recall elections that are just an up or down vote for the sitting governor. Only if the governor survives can he face an opponent. That's what happened to Gray. Thumbs down.
So you tro criticizing people for saying they ought to have an up or down vote--you are wrong and an ee-jut, too. A payed Ee_jut.
professor: In California, where before the deluge somebody was smart, they
The TP may not win them all (Mr. Romney), but we are getting the lions share, much like 2010. Another TP victory in 2012. RINO's out in Maine, Indiana, Nebraska, and Pennsylvania. And a GREAT TP VICTORY in Wisconsin, in a very purple state.
Love the headline, it was not only an "overwhelming turnout," but an overwhelming victory. It was supposed to be a close election, it was a landslide.
stopgov: The TP may not win them all (Mr. Romney), but
I don't think a recall election should be a contest against someone else. Walker should be held accountable for his record and the voters should determine whether or not he should keep his job, job whether or not they think Walker would do better than the opposing party's candidate.
WhereIsTheTruth: I don't think a recall election should be a contest
Wait, now because your candidate didn't win, you want it different? The progressive left is shameless! why don't you just except this state and more importantly this country rejects every message the left comes out with! There's so much chlorine in your gene pool you still believe the rhetoric you paid way to much for at that 4 year university.
you_wish_you_were: Wait, now because your candidate didn't win, you want it
I don't have a horse in the race and would feel the same way if the person subject to recall was a Democrat. I think the first step should be the recall challenge, followed by an election to replace that person should the recall fail.
For clarification, I do have a Master's degree. Should that devalue my opinion that, regardless of party, the candidate up for recall should face that issue first before there being a replacement election?
Finally, my opinion today is the same as it was last weeks, two months again, two years ago... I think a recall election should be a referendum on the person in office first, not an opportunity for them to compete again (that's what the general election is for), the an open election should the recall be successful.
WhereIsTheTruth: I don't have a horse in the race and would
Do you even know what this election was about? It should never have involved candidates, just whether the process of overpowering the unions was legal or not, and whether the governor should have been removed from office or not. That's why state governments have lieutenant governors, to take over if something happens to the head of state, including removal from office.
The scariest thing about this is that so many people seem to treat it like a sporting event, not a referendum about how a representative government should be run.
People who think this was about candidates have been duped.
stevec2nd: Do you even know what this election was about? It
In unprecedented turnout, i'm puzzled how an outcome can be called with 21% reporting. Particularly given the large population centers that have not yet reported. What gives.
concentric1: In unprecedented turnout, i'm puzzled how an outcome can be
The good people of Wis. listened to the wiser,quieter voices. Couldn't be more proud of them. Now they can get back to work fixing this mess the Democrats made. Watch this state prosper, That's what it's all about.
man_hammer: The good people of Wis. listened to the wiser,quieter voices.
We didnt listen, we said it back in 2010 as well, Walker is doing what he said he would. Its just the national media that put this "Walker is doomed" spin on it. The unions knew it was a long shot when they started the recall, and then when Barrett got the spot it was a done deal.
talb9235: We didnt listen, we said it back in 2010 as
You mean the candidate that the people of Wisconsin originally elected beat the guy who originally lost? Oooh, the drama. Barrett was a weak candidate and the DNC should be ashamed to have lost this election. The silver lining for me is that skirmishes like this are putting a very negative spotlight on the Crypt Keepers, I mean Koch Brothers, and other procurers of OUR government functions. Tonight is just a symptom of the problem that has been seething in our country for the last 10 years. It all started with the Florida legislature that stole the Gore presidency and was further continued by the people who ran the worst campaign ever on behalf of John Kerry. After that, it was just a matter of Cheney making a few tweaks to the constitution and here we are. How do you like your America now? Don't worry everyone. Just act normally and continue doing everything you always do. These government terrorists want you to be scared. Don't give them the satisfaction. Just continue to shop and everything will work itself out.
yonoton: You mean the candidate that the people of Wisconsin originally
Sorry I'm proud of voting for Barret. There is no way I would have voted for Walker. Scott signed away the Equal Pay Act, had the Legislature give away their say on BadgerCare and over rulemaking for agencies including the Government Accountability Board which the Governor has no jurisdiction over. Threw away a billion dollars and hundreds of jobs then out of the other side of his mouth parades bringing in 20 jobs while the state is dead last in growth. The man who advocates eliminating visitation rights for gay couples. The guy who pushed through building a strip mall on a wetland to bring in Bass Shop Pro. The guy who wants to sell off our energy infrastructure and kill green energy initiatives.
I'll never regret my vote or the efforts my family put into the recall. Walker and the current crop of conservatives in the legislature is the absolute antithesis of everything I believe in.
Dr_Phibes: Sorry I'm proud of voting for Barret. There is no
Your point is lost on those who seem to think this was just another sporting event. I personally think the unions could have avoided this, and really had it coming, due to their own stupidity. But the political process was subverted in the process, and a lot of people have been duped into something I don't think they understand the long term consequences of.
This is something I would have expected from the former Soviet Union, but not in America. It's pretty scary. And it's ironic that I would expect to see this type of political action in a former communist country, but not here.
stevec2nd: Your point is lost on those who seem to think
119% voter turnouts. Wow...Democrats truly have no shame. Wait until the presidential elections. We'll have Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck by the tens of thousands in this election (much like 2008).
darkwaterz29: 119% voter turnouts. Wow...Democrats truly have no shame. Wait until
Sounds more like CONservative values, if you can win fairly then cheat. If you can't suppress the vote make sure your side votes early and often. Truly sickening.
jsalspach: Sounds more like CONservative values, if you can win fairly
You putz, that turnout is caculated on the number of registered voters PRIOR to the election day. In WI you can register on election day and therefore the number for turnout can be greater than 100%. Figures it would be a con...
rje242: You putz, that turnout is caculated on the number of
Posted: 06/05/2012 7:56 pm Updated: 06/05/2012 8:27 pm