BY EMILY WAGSTER PETTUS, ASSOCIATED PRESS

JACKSON, Miss. -- A hearing Wednesday will help a federal judge decide whether to keep blocking a Mississippi abortion law or let it go into effect.

The state's only abortion clinic, Jackson Women's Health Organization, says it could be forced to close if the state is allowed to start enforcing the measure, which would require anyone performing abortions at the clinic to be an OB-GYN with privileges to admit patients to a local hospital.

The clinic says the admitting privileges are not medically necessary and that it has been unable to obtain them for its two out-of-state OB-GYNs. It also argues in court papers that the requirement "gives hospitals a third-party veto over the availability of abortion in Mississippi" and that the clinic would face "irreparable harm" if the law were enforced.

State attorneys argue the admitting privileges requirement is designed for patient safety. They also note that while the clinic might have to wait to get hospital privileges for the two physicians, "inconvenience is not `irreparable harm.'"

The clinic filed a lawsuit June 27, seeking to stop enforcement of a measure that it says would shut it down and limit women's access to a constitutionally protected medical procedure. U.S. District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III issued a temporary restraining order July 1, the day it was to take effect.

During a hearing set for 1 p.m. Wednesday, the clinic's attorneys will try to persuade Jordan to keep the law on hold, while attorneys for the state will argue it should take effect.

The temporary hold remains in effect through Wednesday's hearing, and both sides have filed extensive written arguments.

Jordan has several options.

He could extend the temporary restraining order and give himself time to issue a written ruling on the clinic's request for a preliminary injunction.


He could rule immediately from the bench, granting a preliminary injunction and giving attorneys on both sides time to prepare for a trial that could take place weeks or months from now.

Or he could allow the state to begin enforcing the law.

If the case goes to trial, the judge would consider whether to issue a permanent block, a decision that could be appealed.

Matt Steffey, a law professor at Mississippi College in Jackson, said a judge considers two main points in deciding whether to issue a preliminary injunction: Would there be irreparable harm if the law is enforced? And, is it likely that the plaintiff who filed the lawsuit - in this case, the clinic - would be successful if the case goes to trial?

The U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 established a nationwide right to abortion. In 1992, the court's decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey upheld the Roe decision and allowed states to regulate abortions before fetuses are viable. The 1992 decision also said states may not place undue burdens or substantial obstacles in the way of women seeking abortion.

Steffey said Wednesday's arguments could be about whether the law could be justified as a legitimate regulation of women's health care.

"That's, I think, the central point that will be in play," Steffey told The Associated Press on Tuesday. "Looking at precedent, this is not the first time that states have tried to regulate abortion clinics out of existence."

The clinic points out that Republican Gov. Phil Bryant said the day he signed the law that he wants Mississippi to be "abortion-free."

"Contrary to plaintiffs' suggestions, however, that comment lacks legal significance," Bryant's attorney, Jack L. Wilson wrote in court papers. "To begin with, Gov. Bryant has also made clear that he supports the law at issue in this case for public health reasons."

If the clinic closes, abortion could be nearly impossible to obtain in Mississippi. The closest clinics to Jackson are about 200 miles away, in Louisiana, Tennessee and Alabama.

Mississippi physicians who perform fewer than 10 abortions a month can avoid having their offices regulated as an abortion clinic, and thus avoid restrictions in the new law. The Health Department said it doesn't have a record of how many physicians perform fewer than 10 abortions a month. Clinic operators say almost all the abortions in the state are done in their building.

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • 99 Problems (JAY-Z)

    Eric Fehrnstrom, senior campaign adviser for Mitt Romney, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/06/03/494238/fehrnstrom-shiny-objects-women/" target="_hplink">said on Sunday</a> that issues pertaining to women's reproductive rights, such as abortion and birth control, were "shiny objects" meant to distract voters from the real issues. "Mitt Romney is pro-life," he told ABC's George Stephanopoulos. "He'll govern as a pro-life president, but you're going to see the Democrats use all sorts of shiny objects to distract people's attention from the Obama performance on the economy. This is not a social issue election."

  • Talk (Coldplay)

    The Senate will vote Thursday on the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would expand and strengthen the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and make it illegal for employers to punish women for bringing up pay disparity issues. Dana Perino, a Fox News contributor and former press secretary for President George W. Bush, <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/30/perino-equal-pay-issue-is-a-distraction-for-just-48-hours/" target="_hplink">called the equal pay issue</a> "a distraction" from the country's real financial problems last week. "Well, it's just yet another distraction of dealing with the major financial issues that the country should be dealing with," Perino said. "This is not a job creator."

  • Just My Imagination (The Temptations)

    Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), whose home state's legislature recently defunded Planned Parenthood and voted to pass a bill that would allow employers to deny women birth control coverage, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/26/john-mccain-war-on-women_n_1455591.html" target="_hplink">delivered a floor speech</a> in which he insisted that the war on women is something imaginary for Democrats to "sputter about." "My friends, this supposed 'War on Women' or the use of similarly outlandish rhetoric by partisan operatives has two purposes, and both are purely political in their purpose and effect: The first is to distract citizens from real issues that really matter and the second is to give talking heads something to sputter about when they appear on cable television," he said.

  • Butterfly Fly Away (Miley & Billy Ray Cyrus)

    Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus tried to trivialize concerns about the legislative "war on women" by comparing it to a "war on caterpillars." "If the Democrats said we had a war on caterpillars and every mainstream media outlet talked about the fact that Republicans have a war on caterpillars, then we'd have problems with caterpillars," Priebus <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-05/priebus-says-gender-battle-as-fictonal-as-caterpillar-war.html" target="_hplink">said in an April interview</a> on Bloomberg Television. "It's a fiction."

  • Distraction (Angels And Airwaves)

    Missouri U.S. Senate candidate Sarah Steelman (R) took heat from her opponents in May when she contended that Democratic lawmakers' focus on the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act was "a distraction" from the issues they should be dealing with instead. "I think it's unfortunate that the Democrats have made a political football out of this thing, which I think is what they keep doing to distract from real problems that are facing our nation," she said in an interview with St. Louis Public Radio.

  • We Don't Care (Kanye West)

    South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R) defended the Republican Party in April for going after insurance coverage for contraception by arguing that women don't actually care about contraception. "Women don't care about contraception," she said on ABC's The View. "They care about jobs and the economy and raising their families and all those other things."