NEW YORK, July 31 (Reuters) - A former Citigroup Inc manager was found not liable on Tuesday of civil charges of misleading investors, a blow to regulators in one of the few fraud cases brought against a Wall Street executive over the collapse of subprime mortgage investments.
Brian Stoker, who worked on the bank's mortgage investments desk, was charged by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as part of a broader civil lawsuit against the bank in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.
The verdict underlined the difficultly of such cases for securities regulators, who historically have worked to reach settlements with corporations and individuals. The SEC's $285 million settlement with Citigroup itself last year is under appeal following an unusual rejection by Judge Jed Rakoff. The outspoken Rakoff also presided over the two-week-long Stoker trial.
"It does make you realize why perhaps the SEC is a little reluctant to squeeze the trigger," said James Cox, a law professor at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, who has written about securities regulations cases.
Stoker was one of four individuals the SEC has charged with misleading buyers of pools of mortgages, called collateralized debt obligations, that contributed to the financial crisis. He was the first to go to trial.
One note of encouragement for the SEC came from the eight jurors who heard the evidence at Stoker's trial. The panel gave the judge a statement to accompany the verdict, a rarity in both civil and criminal trials.
"This verdict should not deter the SEC from continuing to investigate the financial industry, to review current regulations, and modify existing regulations as necessary," the jury said.
The commission argued that Stoker failed to tell the buyers of a $1 billion Citigroup collateralized debt obligation transaction in 2007 that the bank had made a $500 million "short" bet that the mortgage pool would fail.
Stoker and his lawyer argued that he followed the bank's best practices and was singled out for blame.
Stoker left the court smiling. The jury delivered its verdict on its second day of deliberations.
"We are very grateful that justice was done," Stoker's lawyer, John Keker, said outside the courtroom.
Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC's enforcement division, said: "We respect the jury's verdict and will continue to aggressively pursue misconduct arising out of the financial crisis."
The other individuals charged by the SEC with misleading buyers of collateralized debt obligations include Goldman Sachs Group Inc executive Fabrice Tourre, and Edward Steffelin of now-bankrupt GSC Capital Corp, which helped put a CDO together for JPMorgan Chase & Co. They are awaiting trial.
Another executive, Samir Bhatt of Credit Suisse Alternative Capital, settled with the SEC in a case related to the Citigroup deal.
Rakoff had rejected late last year a $285 million settlement between Citigroup and the SEC over the mortgage investment, saying he had no way to know whether the pact was fair because the bank was not required to admit or deny the agency's charges. The bank and the commission are appealing that decision.
On its website, the SEC summarizes more than 100 cases related to the financial crisis that led to total penalties of more than $2.1 billion to help investors harmed by fraud
Citigroup, which is one of those cases, said in a statement on Tuesday that it agreed with the verdict in the Stoker case "and hope to secure final judicial approval of our settlement with the SEC and put this matter behind us."
The case is SEC v. Stoker, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-cv-7387.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.