ASHLAND, Va. -- Democrats, after Mitt Romney named Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) as his running mate Saturday, seized quickly on Ryan's budget. It is now the Romney-Ryan budget.
Republicans, in response, may start mentioning a different pair of hyphenated names: Wyden-Ryan.
Last December, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) announced that he was joining with Ryan to propose a budget and entitlement reform plan. Romney brought up Wyden's name at his third rally of the day in Manassas, referencing that joint plan as the sign of Ryan's commitment to preserve Medicare.
"The president's put out a plan on Medicare. He would cut spending $700 billion," Romney said to a raucous crowd that the campaign estimated at 8,000. "Paul Ryan and Sen. Wyden said, 'No, we need to restore, retain and protect Medicare.' That's what our party will do."
It is this plan that Romney's own website says "almost precisely mirrors Mitt's ideas," in a section that answers the question of how his plan is "different from the Ryan plan."
The Wyden-Ryan plan complicates Democrats' plans to hit Romney and Ryan on their budget.
President Barack Obama has already been running against Ryan's original 2011 budget for some time now. The president has said Romney "plans to turn Medicare into a voucher program."
Romney did say in June 2011 that he would sign Ryan's first budget proposal if it came to his desk as president, but added that Ryan's plan was "not the plan I’ll put forward" if elected.
"I have my own plan," Romney said at the time.
Romney put out his plan last fall, which was similar to Ryan's but differed in a few important ways. It did not eradicate Medicare, which Paul originally proposed doing in 2011 before dropping that idea when he joined with Wyden.
Instead Romney has proposed introducing private plans to compete with Medicare in its current form, and giving seniors a choice between them. In the Wyden-Ryan plan, these plans are part of a government-run exchange.
None of these plans would affect Americans over 55, who would stay in the current system.
Romney's plan also excludes the $500 billion cut to Medicare Ryan proposed in 2011.
And Romney also did not express support for vouchers, which are defined contribution payments given to seniors who use the money to shop around for insurance. Romney favors something called premium support, which is still a defined contribution, but involves the government paying insurers directly.
Ryan made some significant concessions to get Wyden's support. He agreed to have plans placed on government-run exchanges and accepted robust consumer protections to prevent insurance company abuses. In addition, if costs rise above the cap set for the premium support payments to seniors, Congress would be required to act to fix that problem.
"Wyden-Ryan is more like Obama’s Affordable Care Act, which also features health insurance exchanges, than Ryan I, which would have forced seniors to fend for themselves," wrote Will Marshall, a centrist Democrat who is president of the Progressive Policy Institute.
Ryan also dropped most of the philosophical language in his original "Road Map," including an entire section about America's "expanding culture of dependency."
"Reform is now essential to ensure that Medicare will remain a guaranteed, affordable lifeline for seniors and taxpayers for decades to come," Wyden and Ryan wrote in the introduction to their compromise plan last December.
"Left unchecked, the growth of health care costs not only threatens the government’s ability to guarantee Medicare’s promise to millions of seniors, but also puts the solvency of the federal government and the health of the U.S. economy at risk," they wrote. "We can no longer ignore the obvious truth that change within Medicare could actually result in a stronger program."
This post has been updated to include additional information and comments by Romney about the Wyden-Ryan plan.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.