When we first glimpsed Candice Swanepoel's sexy ad campaign for Brian Atwood, we joked that it looked like a veritable make-out party.

Now that we've seen a few more photos and the 48-second video clip, we can confirm that there's, um, more than just making-out going on. In fact the campaign is so racy, reports the New York Post, that the images have been banned from both the facade of Atwood's Madison Avenue store as well as NYC's "Taxi TV" screens. (Although reps for the Taxi and Limousine Commission said it was individual "private vendors," not the Commission overall, that decided to reject the sexy video spot.)

So what's so risque about Swaenpoel's campaign? At first we thought the pictures looked fine -- provocative, of course, but no more than your average Lara Stone for Calvin Klein set-up or soapy Tom Ford romp.

Then we hit "play" on the video and saw the porniness kick in. Our dear sweet Candice goes from nearly-nude to totally nude, watches other nude people fooling around on TV and then does a good amount of her own writhing in bed. Brian Atwood didn't both to call the clip "F**k Me" but he might as well have.

So, as our friends at Styleite asked yesterday, "Is this Brian Atwood ad really just soft porn?" And does it belong on the TV screen in the backseat of New York City taxis? Watch the clip above and glimpse the print campaign below.

PHOTOS:

brian atwood ads

brian atwood ads

brian atwood ads

See more ads that got the boot:

Loading Slideshow...

  • Ryanair

    The ASA <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/15/banned-ryanair-ad_n_1279529.html?1329336365" target="_hplink">banned these Ryanair ads in February 2012</a>, deeming them too "sexually suggestive" to run in newspapers.

  • Drop Dead clothing line

    Banned in November 2011 for<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/10/drop-dead-ads-banned-asa_n_1085903.html" target="_hplink"> showing an "underweight" model</a> and sending an "irresponsible" message.

  • Marc Jacobs Oh, Lola!

    Banned in November 2011 for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/09/dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-marc-jacobs_n_1083535.html" target="_hplink">its potential to "sexualise a child."</a>

  • L'Oréal's Revitalift Repair 10

    Banned in February 2012, for "misleadingly exaggerated the performance of the product," i.e. smoothing over Rachel Weisz's skin with technology, not makeup.

  • Marks & Spencer lingerie

    Banned in November 2011 for <a href="http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/news-features/TMG8924873/Marks-and-Spencer-lingerie-advert-banned-for-being-too-sexy.html" target="_hplink">showing ''objectified women''</a> and images that are ''sexually suggestive'' and likely to be seen by children.

  • Lynx Deodorant

    Banned in November 2011 for being <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/26/banned-deodorant-ads-uk-lucy-pinder-lynx_n_1113958.html?1322660080" target="_hplink">"sexually suggestive, indecent, provocative."</a>

  • Miu Miu Fall 2011

    Banned in November 2011 for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/23/hailee-steinfeld-miu-miu-ad-banned_n_1109948.html" target="_hplink">its setting, on a rail road track, being "irresponsible."</a>

  • Lancome

    Banned in July 2011 for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/27/julia-roberts-loreal-ad-ban_n_910587.html" target="_hplink">"excessive retouching."</a>

  • Maybelline's The Eraser

    Banned in July 2011 for "excessive retouching."

  • Yves Saint Laurent's Belle D'Opium fragrance

    Banned in February 2011 for suggesting <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/02/ysl-belle-dopium-ad-banne_n_817455.html" target="_hplink">"the injection of opiates into the body."</a>

  • American Apparel Ads

    Some of American Apparel ads (including the one above) were banned by Britain's ASA for gratuitous nudity; a few more were deemed "exploitative" for sexualizing young women. (American Apparel photo)

  • Lara Stone for Calvin Klein

    In 2012, Lara Stone posed with a group of male models in this Calvin Klein ad. It was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/21/calvin-klein-billboard-ba_n_771559.html" target="_blank">promptly banned by Australia's Advertising Standards Bureau</a> after they found it to be "suggestive of violence and rape."

  • Bulgari's Julianne Moore Ad

    This ad was pulled in Italy in 2011 after the mayor of Venice found it inappropriate.

  • Rimmel's Mascara Ad

    The British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/26/why-was-this-georgia-may-_n_788605.html" target="_blank">banned this ad after they declared it misleading</a> because Georgia May Jagger is wearing false eyelashes -- even though there's a small disclaimer at the bottom that says, "show with lash inserts."

  • Brian Atwood's Madison Avenue Ads

    The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/23/brian-atwood-ads-banned_n_1824162.html" target="_blank">video of this ad was banned from taxis and the print versions were banned</a> from the facade of Atwood's Madison Avenue store after being found to be too racy.

  • Natalie Portman for Dior

    The Advertising Standards Authority<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/23/natalie-portman-dior-ad-banned-mascara_n_2004837.html" target="_blank"> banned this ad </a>because they felt the ad used excessive "post-production retouching" in order to exaggerate the real effects of the mascara being advertised.

  • Tom Ford's Gucci Campaign

    In 2004, this Tom Ford Gucci ad campaign became controversial as women saw the girl's shaved pubic hair as degrading and wrong.

  • Rachel Weisz for L'Oreal Paris

    This ad was banned after a complaint from Liberal Democrat Jo Swinson who claimed the ad was "misleadingly exaggerated" in that is makes Weisz look far younger than she actually is and presents a bad image for women.

  • American Apparel Sock Ad

    Oh American Apparel, how you love to push the envelope. Here's another one that was banned because the ad is supposed to be promoting socks but it seems more to be exploiting the girl instead.

  • Taylor Swift for CoverGirl

    This Taylor Swift mascara ad was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/20/covergirl-mascara-ad-banned_n_1159957.html" target="_blank">banned by the National Advertising Division of the COuncil of Better Business Bureaus Claims (NAD)</a> after they found the product depiction to be dishonest with it's claims that the mascara will make lashes have "2X more volume" and be "20 percent lighter."

  • American Apparel Models

    Again, American Apparel gets in hot water when they apparently use underage models (girls younger than 16) on their website. Britain's ASA <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/05/american-apparel-sexy-ads-asa-child-models_n_2243360.html#slide=1805970" target="_blank">accused the store of "sexualizing" underage models. </a>

Want more? Be sure to check out HuffPost Style on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr and Pinterest.