iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Smart Start? Will Preschool Budget Cuts Damage A Generation

Posted:   |  Updated: 10/29/2012 6:12 am EDT

2012-08-24-photo13.PNG

Three days before the end of pre-school, Ms. Sabrena and the children sit around the table playing Bingo on boards the size of placemats. Nawal only needs one more tile to win. Tiny and delicate, with dark, serious eyes, she has quietly assembled a dangerous arsenal. Ms. Sabrena notices and raises an eyebrow. "You have to watch out for the quiet ones," she says. But a few moments later, when Nawal's number comes up, Nawal won't say the one word her teacher wants to hear. Ms. Sabrena encourages her: "What do you say?" Nawal places her tile on the board, looks straight ahead and says nothing.

Ms. Sabrena—Sabrena Robinson to those over three feet tall—works at a childcare center in Raleigh, North Carolina, a state with one of the most acclaimed child care systems in the country. From the outside, the center looks like nothing special: a low, cinder-block building with a big backyard. What's unusual is Ms. Sabrena's classroom. Of the 100 or so children enrolled at the school, 18 of them—those in Ms. Sabrena's care—are part of something called North Carolina Pre-Kindergarten, a free state program designed to ensure that every child in the state is ready for kindergarten by the age of five.

In recent years, a number of studies have shown that pre-Kindergarten programs can help low-income children succeed in later grades and eventually get good jobs. Many researchers feel that investing in pre-K is the best and most cost-effective way to lift children out of poverty and to build up the economy. As the director of one pre-K program in North Carolina put it, "There are only 2,000 days between the time a baby is born and the time she shows up for kindergarten and her experiences in this time will determine how her brain is wired."

Education experts all around the country have cited North Carolina’s system as one of the best examples of what states can do to ensure a bright future for children deemed “at risk” of struggling in school. The state funds not just one but two related programs. While the first, North Carolina Pre-Kindergarten, only enrolls four-year-olds, a second, Smart Start, offers a variety of services for children ranging in age from birth to five. No other state has gone further in investing in young children, so last year, when legislators in the state slashed the budget for both programs by millions of dollars and made several other policy changes that would have prevented thousands of low-income 4-year-olds from getting a free education, the news upset teachers and child care advocates well beyond the borders of North Carolina.

In 2010, for the first time in a century, Republicans had come to power in the state legislature, and like many other lawmakers around the country, they had responded to the recession by pulling money out of programs for the poor. Thousands of low-income kids who would have otherwise started preschool in September were put on a waitlist. Political turmoil ensued. Six months after the cuts were made, the governor, a Democrat and a former teacher, came up with enough money to take most of the kids off the wait list, but by then only half a year remained until the start of kindergarten. Ms. Sabrena wasn’t sure that would be enough time for Nawal.

Nawal was Ms. Sabrena’s most challenging case*, and Ms. Sabrena had a few theories as to why. The child didn’t speak English at home (her parents came from what is now North Sudan) and, as far as Ms. Sabrena could tell, she’d spent little time around other children before starting the pre-K program. (The terms pre-K and preschool are often used interchangeably, but educators tend to reserve “pre-K” for those programs specifically geared toward preparing four-year-olds for kindergarten.)

Nawal’s parents were strangers to the country and they didn’t seem to have many friends here. Even if they could afford swimming classes or ballet or karate, Ms. Sabrena wasn’t sure they’d know where to look.

In some ways Nawal’s situation wasn’t so different from that of her classmates. Most of the children in the state program come from poor families, and many of the kids in Ms. Sabrena’s class tested their teacher’s capacity for maintaining a calm demeanor. One of the girls would barely eat anything all day; the way she pushed her food around on the plate reminded Ms. Sabrena of an anorexic teenager. Another girl had to meet with a speech therapist because she couldn’t pronounce simple words. Even so, Nawal stood out. As far as Ms. Sabrena was concerned, none of her classmates were more “at risk” than her.
Sometimes Ms. Sabrena wondered whether Nawal suffered from selective mutism, an extreme social phobia characterized by an inability to speak in certain settings. For the first month of school, she didn’t talk at all. When the other kids filled buckets in the sandbox or made make-believe cakes in the make-believe kitchen, she’d stand against the wall with her hands balled by her side, staring into the distance.

After some time in the classroom, she’d slowly started “coming out,” as Ms. Sabrena put it. She began sitting on the rug during circle time, joined the other girls at the make-believe stove, rode a tricycle in circles around the playground. By the end of three months, she was even talking a little. She talked quietly, never more than a word or two at a time, and only when someone talked to her first, and rarely to grownups. But she talked. Recalling this discovery, Ms. Sabrena raised her hands to the heavens and did an impression of a choir singer praising the Lord.

As Nawal had settled into the classroom routine, Ms. Sabrena began taking videos of her on her phone. She intended to give
them to Nawal’s mom to give to Nawal’s kindergarten teacher so that the teacher wouldn’t make the mistake of putting her in a special ed class. Ms. Sabrena didn’t think she needed special classes. All Nawal needed, she felt, was a little more time. But now the end of the program was only three days away. “Nawal,” said Ms. Sabrena, “will you call the numbers?”
The ever enthusiastic Bryan came to the rescue: “I will call the numbers Ms. Sabrena!”
“Hold on,” said Ms. Sabrena. “I was asking Nawal. Nawal?”

* The names of some students and parents have been changed at the parents’ request.

FOLLOW EDUCATION

Three days before the end of pre-school, Ms. Sabrena and the children sit around the table playing Bingo on boards the size of placemats. Nawal only needs one more tile to win. Tiny and delicate, ...
Three days before the end of pre-school, Ms. Sabrena and the children sit around the table playing Bingo on boards the size of placemats. Nawal only needs one more tile to win. Tiny and delicate, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 164
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
foresure
Brash and Harsh
05:39 PM on 09/03/2012
Deatroying pre-school for the children of poor parents is one of the most effective ways the 1%/T/GOP party can destroy America.

There is no question that children are learning machines in pre-school, and carry that with them for many years.

If the 1%/T/GOP can make pre-school, actual pre-school unavailable to even the middle class, they wil not have to trouble themselves with voter suppression.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kate Perez
07:46 AM on 08/31/2012
I'm amazed by all of the hateful comments about poor children and their parents. What do we want to bet that most of those spewing these comments call themselves "Christian?" Good pre-K programs have a well proven track record of improving school readiness. Kids who do well in school contribute more to society. If we cheap out and let them fail, we can pay for prison or welfare later and feel all righteous that we didn't want to pay for that little kid to learn stuff because WE didn't have pre-K. Good plan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
10YearTeacher
08:32 PM on 08/30/2012
Study after study shows that good pre-K education helps kids, especially ones growing up in poverty. So of course Republicans pull the plug on that. They like the population to be ignorant, especially poor people who tend to vote against them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
08:10 PM on 08/30/2012
Preschool programs help young parents get an education as well as the children entered. But such a program is just the kind the super-teapublicans can't abide because it defies their belief that any government encouragement of the very young is too intrusive, too "intellectual", and not in the mainstream as they see it. But it makes a tremendous difference in the lives of the youngsters and their parents I think because they actually learn how to eat with others, with manners, with foods that their parents probably never had themselves...something other than hamburgers and hot dogs. Plus the reading emphasis is worth the entire program.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:22 PM on 08/30/2012
I'm more concerned about the standardized testing which will eventually take over preschool.
05:03 PM on 08/30/2012
Has anyone ever done studies showing the effect of preschool, if any, on students' academic or intellectual development?
06:43 PM on 08/30/2012
I second that. I lived next door to a daycare center. It was dreadful. The kids screamed during recess like someone was chasing them with a knife. They yelled at them unrelentingly too. The place was nasty from the outside too, like in an unsanitary way. .... According to psychology 3-4 year olds who are either under-attended to or over-attended to turn into narcissists. Real narcissists, not the ones in the literary sense. OK? Ok. Don't worry about cuts, worry about this society. If you want to have kids, have the time to tend to them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dannywanny
07:23 PM on 08/30/2012
There are numerous studies going back decades showing that children are capable of learning at an early age and will advance faster intellectually if given the opportunity.

70% of China's children are enrolled in preschool classes, with more projected every year. China is a juggernaut that cant be stopped. Other asian countries are aggressive about education and start early too.

Preschool classes in the US hardly exist anymore and our educational system is declining rapidly against other sophisticated countries. Funding to education is being cut every year and some in Congress want to eliminate the Department of Education. Our high school dropout rate is shameful and the literacy rate in many states is at the bottom and declining.

It doesn't bode well for our future.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:52 AM on 08/30/2012
Good quality preschool where the emphasis is on supporting the metacognitive skills of each child will help kids be ready for school (and for life) - this has been shown in various studies around the world. Unfortunately the idea of standards and testing is trickling down from public education and kindergarten to preschools, too, seriously damaging kids' intrinsic motivation to learn, and changing it to a performance measure, which makes learning a tedious task instead of an exciting adventure. Children are born with curiosity and the need to make sense of the surrounding world, and preschool can provide them with experiences which improve concept development and truly make children ready and eager to learn more. One contributing factor to the excellent PISA results in Finland is the subjective right of each child to get into a free or low cost early childhood education program. These programs don't drill three-year-olds to read, but provide an environment that helps children learn to learn and enjoy it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dannywanny
07:30 PM on 08/30/2012
F & F.
08:34 AM on 08/30/2012
Yeah right, these are the kids whose mommy has a different man spend each night, kids who have never had a story read to them at home and kids who haven't eaten breakfast in 4 years.

Pre-school BEGINS at home and not in the public school system.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:06 AM on 08/30/2012
It begins at home, but continues in public, including public schools.

Children who are born into unfortunate circumstances should not have to suffer because their parents are incapable of providing the intellectual stimulation they need.

Pay now or pay more later is true. Early intervention is a wise investment.

People in power talk a lot about how important children and education are, but until they follow through with actions and funding their words are empty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Llib Noswad
aka: Bill, Conservative
03:20 PM on 08/30/2012
"parents are incapable of providing the intellectual stimulation they need."

Parents that meet these criteria should never have a child.
Chrismoo3
Interesting, though elementary
03:45 PM on 08/30/2012
Your comment is very correct in all points. F & F
11:10 AM on 08/30/2012
Well, as a nation, we have a choice.

Quality early childhood education for low-income children is one of the smartest investments nations can make, returning $7-10 for every dollar invested.

We can blame these children for choosing who you think are the wrong parents, or we can help them and make much America stronger.

Do we choose the blaming response or the wise and caring response?

WWJD?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Llib Noswad
aka: Bill, Conservative
03:20 PM on 08/30/2012
It's the parents responsibility, not the taxpayer.
04:58 AM on 08/31/2012
Early childhood intervention has been proven beneficial ONLY for black children.  Between abortions and felony convictions, the blacks are rendering themselves politically irrelevant.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
06:54 AM on 08/30/2012
Boomers have been destroying generations since they voted in Reagan. They don't care.
06:52 PM on 08/29/2012
And who did you stay at home with? I'm assuming your parents had a caregiver?
What do you suggest for low income parents who are both working during the day, and don't have the good fortune of supportive grandparents and family? Hmm...you think the child would progress developmentally, or do "quite well in grade school and college" if he/she were to be left alone at home or with a nanny who watches a ridiculous amount of children illegally with little resources. This last resort will be the only option these parents have at a cost that they can afford. What happens to social mobility when we are forced to succumbed to ill-care, poor education, etc.? With the big picture in mind- do you support our society's veiled socioeconomic stratification system? In reading many of your response, perhaps you do.
wanntabnice
Conservative in most matters
03:40 PM on 08/29/2012
How about people pay to sent ttheir kids to pre-school, people want the tax payers to support their kids and that is not right.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
08:15 PM on 08/29/2012
how about we eliminate public schools entirely, so school will only be available for those who can afford it. it's not as if better-educating our country might somehow be useful.
wanntabnice
Conservative in most matters
08:23 PM on 08/29/2012
The subject is pre-school and both our children sarafice to sent our grandchildren to preschool.  Unless I am wrong pre-school is only offered in private schools in NY.  What is you beef?
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
06:56 AM on 08/30/2012
we get it- you are angry mr cranky pants that leeched off the civilization left to you and in return you don't want to leave anything for anyone else. its all about you -- do your little its all about you dance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patrix
LIBERAL
03:31 PM on 08/29/2012
BAIN CAPITAL will invest TAX PAYERS MONEY into PRIVATE EQUITY and the tax payer will NOT SEE ONE PENNY OF THE CAPITAL GAINS
03:26 PM on 08/29/2012
How about we call "Pre School" what it really is.....FREE DAYCARE!!!! And yes, Im all for cuts in "Free Daycare"!!!!
photo
Brown Buddha
Throwing pebbles into the ocean
03:32 PM on 08/29/2012
Are for abortion?
03:34 PM on 08/29/2012
Absolutely!!!
03:32 PM on 08/29/2012
And another thing....You have to be low income to even qualify for Pre School, so why is that?? If you work and earn your way, your kid cant even go to Pre School!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stickman125
06:10 AM on 08/30/2012
"If you work and earn your way, your kid cant even go to Pre School!!"

Uh? I don't know where you live, but there are plenty of affordable pre-school programs around here. Many follow a curriculum which makes them more than babysitting and are available to anybody from any social class.
hollyk
Laugh, love and enjoy what you have
10:31 AM on 08/30/2012
Probably depends on the state, but not all pre k programs are for low income--in Florida they have a free pre k for anyone who is interested. It will be interesting to see if pre school makes a difference way down the road, there was a study done a long while back about the gains that Headstart gave kids-- which were lost by the 3rd grade.
photo
florishes
Business is good...
03:11 PM on 08/29/2012
The wright wangs of da RNC Platform say iffin we have Larnin' from home skoolin' we will be N-abled to kompete globe-ally.
10:39 AM on 08/30/2012
Homeschoolers regularly outperform both public and private school students on standardized tests and make a clean sweep of competitions like spelling bees, whereas there is very little evidence for the effectiveness of preschool, except with disabled students and English language learners. While I very much doubt that the RNC platform says that, they would not be entirely wrong if they did. (I am sure homeschooling would be less effective if homeschoolers were not exclusively those who chose homeschooling over other options.) I think it is rather low of you to mock southerners' accents, also. People's varying pronunciations is how languages change. That's why we have so many different languages in the world.
photo
florishes
Business is good...
11:42 AM on 08/30/2012
I was actually mocking a poorly educated person - not Southerners. I hadn't thought of Southerners at all, though I can see where the language is similar. More to the point is, once we get rid of birth control pills and use abstinence only, I predict a streaming torrent of teen pregnancies. In these cases, home schooling will consist of children teaching children- some of whom were taught by children. I believe many will slip through the cracks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jd2020
Bill the Cat for President
02:02 PM on 08/30/2012
Homeschooling will only work for a small fraction of the population, i.e., those parents who have time, resources and are capable of providing a proper learning environment at home. What's more, parents who are actively involved in their children's education are the key to a success of ANY school. Homeschooling is NOT the answer at the national level.
11:59 PM on 09/02/2012
Excuse me. I was home schooled through most of my primary education. I went on to go to college. Now I have a great job and my husband and I work very hard to afford what will end up being a 14K/year/child tuition for private school and preschool for our two daughters. Education is important, and some parents truly do teach their children better than our broken excuse for a public school system.
photo
florishes
Business is good...
03:21 AM on 09/03/2012
My point is that home schooling is not sound National policy when we have dropout rates up to 40 percent in some districts. It is a nice option if a child's Mother is financially able to stay home AND has a college education.

What if we have high school dropouts teaching their children at home. After how many generations do you think we'll produce STEM scholars?
photo
SDpianomom
faith, values, truth, logic
02:59 PM on 08/29/2012
Why should a state be responsible to provide free preschool? I had to pay for my own kids' preschool. My parent's couldn't afford preschool so I never went and guess what, I did quite well in grade school and college.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stickman125
06:11 AM on 08/30/2012
The same reason states provide free k-12 education.
photo
SDpianomom
faith, values, truth, logic
11:39 AM on 08/30/2012
Preschool is nothing more than daycare and it's not the government's responsibility to babysit kids while their parents go to work. That's what this issue is really about. Sure there a couple of skills kids learn at preschool...how to cut and paste, and maybe how to write their letters...all things they do at home anyway. It is certainly not a program important enough to increase state spending for. And here I am speaking as a mom who put all 4 of my kids in preschool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulhunterjones
A new age Republican
03:23 PM on 08/30/2012
Good question! I do not understand why the state should provide free preschool. Government needs to get smaller and people need to stop expecting that everything will be provided free of cost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dannywanny
08:14 PM on 08/30/2012
When every technologically advanced country in the world put their kids in preschool provided by the state how do you expect your kids to compete for jobs in a world market? China is expected to overtake us in less than twenty years and 70% of their kids are in preschool.