* Part of U.S. probe of $3.7 trillion muni bond market
* Fraud by ex-UBS employees spanned five years -prosecution
* Defense lawyer indicates an appeal is likely
By Basil Katz and Grant McCool
NEW YORK, Aug 31 (Reuters) - Three former UBS AG executives were convicted on Friday of conspiring to deceive U.S. cities and towns by operating a scheme to rig bids to invest municipal bond proceeds.
The verdict by a federal court jury in Manhattan is the latest victory for the U.S. Department of Justice in its broad investigation of the $3.7 trillion U.S. municipal bond market. The widespread probe has touched some of the world's largest banks.
The three defendants, Peter Ghavami, Gary Heinz and Michael Welty, were charged in 2010 as part of a probe focused on rooting out schemes to fix prices and rig bids on bond transactions. The former bankers denied wrongdoing and said government witnesses had lied to ensnare them.
Each defendant was found guilty on two counts of conspiracy. The jury also convicted Heinz and Welty on other charges, but found Welty not guilty on one wire-fraud count, and Heinz not guilty of witness tampering. Heinz was the only one of the three to face that charge.
Ghavami, a Belgian national, left UBS in 2007 as global head of commodities. Both Heinz, of Jersey City, New Jersey, and Welty, of New York, worked on UBS' municipal bond reinvestment and derivatives desk at the time of the suspected offenses.
Prosecutors said the men took part in separate fraud conspiracies between March 2001 and November 2006. The U.S. government has a 10-year window to bring criminal charges over suspected crimes that affect financial institutions.
In this case, since the three bankers were charged in December 2010, the case falls within the statute of limitations, according to rulings by the trial judge, Kimba Wood. The trial lasted a month.
"For years, these executives corrupted the competitive bidding process and defrauded municipalities across the country out of money for important public works projects," Scott Hammond of the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division said in a statement after the verdict.
The two conspiracy charges involved rigging bids in 2001 and 2002 for guaranteed investment contracts, which cities and counties use to park proceeds from municipal bond sales.
The conspiracy charges carry a maximum of five years in prison each. The charge of conspiracy to commit wire fraud carries a maximum 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The judge did not immediately schedule sentencing dates.
Charles Stillman, a lawyer for Ghavami, told reporters: "We are obviously disappointed with the verdict. We are looking forward to an appeal... "
Lawyers for the other two defendants declined to comment.
Stillman told the jury in his closing arguments this week that his client "did nothing more than his job entirely in good faith and that he never intended to and never did cheat a municipality, the Internal Revenue Service, anyone."
During the trial, the jury heard from government witnesses who pleaded guilty to similar crimes and agreed to testify against the defendants, and also heard audio recordings of conversations between the bankers.
The jury began deciding the case on Wednesday afternoon.
"It was horrendously difficult. It was a big deal, what we had to weigh," one juror, who asked not to be identified, said after the verdict.
Nineteen people have been convicted or pleaded guilty to charges stemming from the bid-rigging investigation, Friday's government statement said. It said one company has pleaded guilty.
In July, former JPMorgan Chase & Co banker Alexander Wright pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud for manipulating the bidding process for a June 2002 contract.
Wright and former UBS employee Mark Zaino testified for the government at the trial of the former UBS executives. Zaino pleaded guilty in 2010 to bid-rigging charges.
The case is USA v. Peter Ghavami et al, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 10-cr-1217.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.