iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Desmond Tutu: Bush, Blair Should Face Trial Over Iraq

Desmond Tutu

By DAVID STRINGER   09/02/12 07:13 AM ET  AP

LONDON -- Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Desmond Tutu called Sunday for Tony Blair and George Bush to face prosecution at the International Criminal Court for their role in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq

Tutu, the retired Anglican Church's archbishop of South Africa, wrote in an op-ed piece for The Observer newspaper that the ex-leaders of Britain and the United States should be made to "answer for their actions."

The Iraq war "has destabilized and polarized the world to a greater extent than any other conflict in history," wrote Tutu, who was awarded the Nobel prize in 1984.

"Those responsible for this suffering and loss of life should be treading the same path as some of their African and Asian peers who have been made to answer for their actions in the Hague," he added.

The Hague, Netherlands, based court is the world's first permanent war crimes tribunal and has been in operation for 10 years. So far it has launched prosecutions only in Africa, including in Sudan, Congo, Libya and Ivory Coast.

Tutu has long been a staunch critic of the Iraq war, while others opposed to the conflict – including playwright Harold Pinter – have previously called for Bush and Blair to face prosecution at the Hague.

"The then-leaders of the U.S. and U.K. fabricated the grounds to behave like playground bullies and drive us further apart. They have driven us to the edge of a precipice where we now stand – with the specter of Syria and Iran before us," said Tutu, who last week withdrew from a conference in South Africa due to Blair's presence at the event.

While the International Criminal Court can handle cases of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, it does not currently have the jurisdiction to prosecute crimes of aggression. Any potential prosecution over the Iraq war would likely come under the aggression category.

The U.S. is among nations which do not recognize the International Criminal Court.

In response to Tutu, Blair said he had great respect for the archbishop's work to tackle apartheid in South Africa, but accused him of repeating inaccurate criticisms of the Iraq war.

"To repeat the old canard that we lied about the intelligence is completely wrong as every single independent analysis of the evidence has shown," Blair said. "And to say that the fact that Saddam (deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein) massacred hundreds of thousands of his citizens is irrelevant to the morality of removing him is bizarre."

However, Blair said that "in a healthy democracy people can agree to disagree."

In Britain, a two-year long inquiry examining the buildup to the Iraq war and its conduct is yet to publish its final report. The panel took evidence from political leaders including Blair, military chiefs and intelligence officers. Two previous British studies into aspects of the war cleared Blair's government of wrongdoing.

The Iraq war was bitterly divisive in the U.K. and saw large public demonstrations. However, Blair subsequently won a 2005 national election, though with a reduced majority.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

LONDON -- Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Desmond Tutu called Sunday for Tony Blair and George Bush to face prosecution at the International Criminal Court for their role in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of I...
LONDON -- Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Desmond Tutu called Sunday for Tony Blair and George Bush to face prosecution at the International Criminal Court for their role in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of I...
Filed by Alana Horowitz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,847
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (123 total)
06:07 PM on 03/06/2013
Article 6(c) of the Nuremberg Tribunal makes it a war crime to commit "murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated."

Principle VII of the Nuremberg principle states "Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law."

Former President Bush appears guilty of numerous war crimes, including waging aggressive war and the ordering of torture, renditioning and waterboarding, the last which he freely admitted and for which Japanese war criminals were hanged. Hence, Bush has admitted committing crimes the U.S. views as justifying literal execution.

By shielding President Bush and Vice President Cheney, and the CIA agents actually involved in these acts, President Obama himself appears to be in outright violation of Principle VII of the Nuremberg Principles and is shielding from arrest people who have committed crimes warranting arrest, trial and execution, in and of itself a violation of international law by our own nation's standards.

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Principles

http://www.currentconcerns.ch/index.php?id=148

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2009/04/yes-we-did-execute-japanese-soldiers-waterboarding-american-pows
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RepsSuck
12:30 PM on 11/19/2012
The USA is not allowed to attack other countries without a threat to the US itself. Bush manufactured a reason, and defied the Constitution. He should be brought up on charges. He, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, etc; should go to prison.
photo
Claudia King
Tax the rich; avoid war; create justice.
02:47 AM on 09/22/2012
Bravo, Desmond Tutu. Blair IS a liar and a war criminal, as are the Bush Cabal. They will never be held accountable for atrocities they engineered in our names. And, you are correct re the war's influence on the acts and the international climate that have followed; more chickens coming home to roost (as in "No Justice, No Peace").
03:45 AM on 09/06/2012
I agree.. Send them to the Hague..So sorry world ....Be sure to tell the hague about the torture of a prisoner in order to get the fake evidence to go to war bush..
03:37 AM on 09/06/2012
Bush is the worst president this country ever had. And don't get me started on that vampire of a VP.
03:00 AM on 09/06/2012
A prophetic voice, crying in the wilderness. But, truly another reason he should be the next Archbishop of Canterbury.
12:12 AM on 09/06/2012
Why Americans are so unaware about the nature of terrorism that the USA is spreading to the outside world to maintain its hegemony??? US troops have killed thousands of innocent Iraqis in the name of liberating them from Saddam Hussein. Seems like US really liberated them but not only from Saddam but from their from their lives. When some misguided Muslim terrorist kill people Americans call it a barbaric act of murder on the other hand when US troops kills people they call it "collateral damage".....why these people are so selective about categorizing the crime???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BillKen
05:49 PM on 09/16/2012
Looking at our warts is strictly forbidden and that leads many to believe we have none.
The sad thing is we will have to stop fantasizing and jump on the reality train soon or
we will be overwhelmed by the consequences of our ignorance. We need to look in the
direction of our ideals, we are adrift in a world constructed on lies, meant to benefit the
lucky few and swamp the many ignorant . You have no doubt heard the saying, 'do as I
say not as I do', it applies here.
Semper Fi
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cathleen
07:36 PM on 09/05/2012
Archbishop Tutu is absolutely right. The U.S. congress and President Obama's administration did absolutely nothing to hold the Bush administration accountable for the deadly WMD "pack of lies" knowingly created, disseminated and cherry picked out of the Penatagon's Office of Special Plans. No one held accountable. No one held accountable for the Niger Documents. Hundreds of thousands of people are dead, injured, millions displaced as a direct consequence of those lies. President Obama is a coward on this issue. Attorney General Eric Holder is a coward on this issue. The very least they could have done for those who have lost their lives based on this "pack of lies" or their family members is to hold those accountable for the false pre war intelligence. This is the least they could have done. Instead we hear President Obama say "forward, forward, forward" Don't be about retribution, vengeance, witch hunts. Enough of this negligence this cowardice. President Obama is a disgrace in the area of accountability for very serious crimes committed by the Bush administration. A coward. Thank you Archbishop Tutu..this issue should have been picked up by the ICC.
photo
Claudia King
Tax the rich; avoid war; create justice.
03:30 AM on 09/22/2012
I agree but find a bit of merit to Obama's feeling he couldn't focus on holding war criminals accountable/couldn't create more division when the country was on the verge of depression, and when he wanted to pursue cooperative overtures to the right. I don't agree with manyt of Obama's decisions, including ones related to citizen/foreign prisoner civil liberties. But, so far. I think I've understood his rationale's when I've disagreed. There shouldn't be time limits re when Bush, et. al., are held accountable, Someone, someday, should hold monsters here accountable (those who knew 9/11 was coming/did not stop it/likely facilitated it/ lied us into war, and those who okayed or carried out renditions/tortures. That Hillary supported invading Iraq was particularly galling; it appeared a so transparently political decision - that she was willing to knowingly sacrifice Iraq's humanity for illegitimate reasons in support of her presidential ambitions, wanting voters to know she was as tough as any man who had a pair. Having overwhelming power/hedgemonic wet dreams means that the our country will continue to do in our names that which brings shame and horror upon us. Just like those worldwide (especially brown) people who know they/their resources are our targets, we who witness live our lives waiting for the next shoe to drop.
06:14 PM on 03/06/2013
Not arresting Bush, Cheney, and the individuals involved in war crimes is a violation of Nuremberg Principle VII, and makes President Obama equally accountable for their crimes under our own nation's participation in defining international law. By not acting in good faith to arrest them and have them tried in a binding court, he is responsible for their acts and subject to arrest himself - if in the unlikely event that should ever occur.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hutch
"TOUJOURS PRET"
07:08 PM on 09/05/2012
Oh boy, his opinion matters........What does he think of random "Drone Strikes" or "Kill Lists"?
05:45 PM on 09/05/2012
Oh my. I met Bishop Tutu when he visited our Episcopal Cathedral in St. Louis, Missouri. It seems he is in declining physical and mental health nowadays. Such a shame.
03:51 AM on 09/06/2012
you must be unique in St. Louis for that as a take away from this article, Tutu is not only right, he's right on!
photo
anima mundi
Love's the only engine of survival... LC
05:12 PM on 09/05/2012
Well, if Blair is right, then he should have no problem convincing the court of that. I, for one, would like to see Bush and Blair both have to stand accountable for their actions. Let the courts decide.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
04:33 PM on 09/05/2012
People forget Richard Clark's book, bush's national security adviser when he took office. In his first meeting bush asked Clark to find a way to attack Iraq. The cheney lies came soon after.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cathleen
07:41 PM on 09/05/2012
Former counter terrorism expert Richard Clarke said in his book "Against all Enemies" said that he asked to meet with Condi "mushroom cloud" Rice and Stephen Hadley and they refused I believe it was four times when the Bush administration came into office. Clarke said he wanted to talk with them specifically about Bin Laden and Al Queda. He met with them just a few days before the 9/11 attack. The Bush administrations negligence in this area are part of the reason the terrorist were able to get through. Richard Clarke went before congress and testified and apologized to the American people about what he felt to be his failure. Clarke was not part of the go get Iraq team.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
09:46 AM on 09/06/2012
Never said he was. I said in bush's first National Security meeting on January 21, 2001, he ask Clarke to find a way into Iraq. Clarke reports this in his book. How you go from what I said to your unnecessary correction is a mystery to me.
Cheers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
04:30 PM on 09/05/2012
bush/shamey/rumsfeld/scalia/thomas/alito/kennedy should all be charged with High Crimes Against Humanity, shipped to the Hague, tried, convicted of murder and mayhem, fined into poverty and jailed for the rest of their miserable lives. All in Favor...
04:49 PM on 09/05/2012
Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Kennedy are connected to crimes against humanity how? Leftist conspiracy theories are awesome!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
strafem2
04:17 PM on 09/05/2012
Didnt Bush give them a billion dollars to fight Aids in Africa? Love gone TuTU.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eurisko67
04:28 PM on 09/05/2012
Yes, he gave money, that should alleviate his guilt in war crimes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J- A
05:55 PM on 09/05/2012
Much if not most of which likely went to local corruption, warlords and arms deals. Much as what happened to that actual pallet of crisp new bills he lost in Iraq. That sure helped.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SOHOROCKS66
Power only concedes to a greater power.
04:12 PM on 09/05/2012
Desmond Tutu needs to forget about slamming George W. Bush and instead slam Nelson "Figurehead" Mandela and himself for selling out the poor and working class BLACK south Africans. The ghost of Steven Biko and tens of thousands of other murdered victims of Apartheid and their wretched survivors curse the very ground that Mandela and the good Bishop Tutu walk on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
outlawjames8
05:24 PM on 09/05/2012
Bingo!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
05:27 PM on 09/05/2012
Nah - I agree with Desmond Tutu