iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Michelle Kosilek, Inmate Born As Robert Kosilek, Eligible For Legal Fees Reimbursement In Addition To Sex Change

Michelle Kosilek

DENISE LAVOIE   09/17/12 04:15 PM ET  AP

BOSTON — A convicted murderer in Massachusetts who won the right to get a state-funded sex change is also eligible to have legal fees – expected to top $500,000 – paid as well, a federal judge ruled.

In a landmark decision, U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf earlier this month ordered the state Department of Correction to provide sex-reassignment surgery to Michelle Kosilek. Wolf found that prison officials had violated Kosilek's Eighth Amendment right to protection against cruel and unusual punishment, and that the surgery is the "only adequate treatment" for Kosilek's gender-identity disorder.

Wolf has now found that Kosilek is also entitled to legal fees.

"Kosilek has prevailed on his claim that the defendant has violated his Eighth Amendment rights and is continuing to do so. Therefore, he is eligible to be awarded his reasonable attorney's fees and costs," Wolf wrote in an order entered in court Sunday.

Wolf's ruling does not say how much in legal costs Kosilek is eligible for; the case dates back years and the amount is "likely to be large," Wolf wrote.

Kosilek's attorney, Frances Cohen, said she has not yet done a final calculation or submitted a request for fees, but she estimates that attorneys' fees will be comparable to the approximately $500,000 sought in the case of another transgender inmate who also sued the Department of Correction for treatment of gender-identity disorder.

Cohen said she and another lawyer who worked on Kosilek's case have offered to forego their fees if the Department of Correction agrees not to appeal Wolf's ruling. The lawyers would still seek reimbursement for an undetermined amount paid in out-of-pocket expenses, including the fees paid to their experts.

"The judge has discretion to make an award on the basis of a fee application. This has been a hard litigated case, and the law firms ... have spent a lot of time on the case," she said.

"The firms have offered to waive their fees in exchange for Miss Kosilek getting court-ordered relief without further appeal," Cohen said Monday.

DOC spokeswoman Diane Wiffin said the department is reviewing Wolf's ruling on legal fees. She said the department has not made a decision yet on whether to appeal Wolf's ruling ordering sex-reassignment surgery for Kosilek. The department has until Oct. 9 to file a notice of appeal.

State Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr, a Republican from Gloucester, repeated his call for the Department of Correction to appeal Wolf's ruling.

"In ruling that the plaintiff is entitled to legal costs in his pursuit of gender reassignment surgery, Judge Wolf is continuing down the wrong path," Tarr said in a statement Monday.

"This second inappropriate decision makes it even more critical for the Department of Correction to file appeals and stand up for the taxpayers of Massachusetts and the integrity of the Eighth Amendment."

In his ruling, Wolf gave Kosilek's lawyers until Oct. 4 to file a motion for attorneys' fees. He also ordered Department of Correction attorneys to meet with Kosilek's attorneys to see if they can come to an agreement on the amount of fees to be paid.

Kosilek, 63, was born male but lives as a woman in an all-male prison. Kosilek was named Robert when married to Cheryl Kosilek and convicted of murdering her in 1990.

Wolf's ruling marks the first time a judge has ordered prison officials to provide sex-reassignment surgery.

Kosilek first sued state prison officials 12 years ago. Two years later, Wolf ruled that Kosilek was entitled to treatment for gender-identity disorder but stopped short of ordering surgery. Kosilek sued again in 2005, arguing that the surgery was a medical necessity. Kosilek has made two suicide attempts.

In opposing Kosilek's request, prison officials have repeatedly cited security concerns, saying that allowing her to have the surgery could make her a target for sexual assaults by other inmates.

Wolf, however, found that the DOC's security concerns are "either pretextual or can be dealt with."

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Michelle Kosilek, Robert Kosilek

    FILE - In this May 24, 1990 file photo, Robert Kosilek is led to the county jail following his arraignment on drunken driving charges, in New Rochelle, N.Y. Kosilek was convicted in the 1990 murder of his wife in Massachusetts, and has been living as a woman, Michelle Kosilek, and receiving hormone treatments while serving life in prison in Massachusetts. On Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2012, U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf ordered Massachusetts to provide a taxpayer-funded sex-change operation for Kosilek. (AP Photo/Frankie Ziths, File)

  • Robert Kosilek, Michelle Kosilek

    FILE - In this Jan. 15, 1993 file photo, Robert Kosilek sits in Bristol County Superior Court, in New Bedford, Mass., where Kosilek was on trial for the May 1990 murder of his wife. Kosilek was convicted in the murder, and has been living as a woman, Michelle Kosilek, and receiving hormone treatments while serving life in prison in Massachusetts. On Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2012, U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf ordered Massachusetts to provide a taxpayer-funded sex-change operation for Kosilek. (AP Photo/Lisa Bul, File)

  • Michelle Kosilek, Robert Kosilek

    FILE - This May 1990 file booking photo provided by the New Rochelle, N.Y., police department, shows Robert Kosilek, arrested on drunken driving charges. Kosilek was convicted in the 1990 murder of his wife in Massachusetts, and has been living as a woman, Michelle Kosilek, and receiving hormone treatments while serving life in prison in Massachusetts. On Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2012, U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf ordered Massachusetts to provide a taxpayer-funded sex-change operation for Kosilek. (AP Photo/New Rochelle Police Department, File)

  • Michelle Kosilek, Robert Kosilek

    FILE - In this May 24, 1990 file photo, Robert Kosilek is led to a paddy wagon enroute to the county jail following his arraignment on drunken driving charges, in New Rochelle, N.Y. Kosilek was convicted in the 1990 murder of his wife in Massachusetts, and has been living as a woman, Michelle Kosilek, and receiving hormone treatments while serving life in prison in Massachusetts. On Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2012, U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf ordered Massachusetts to provide a taxpayer-funded sex-change operation for Kosilek. (AP Photo/Frankie Ziths, File)



FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

BOSTON — A convicted murderer in Massachusetts who won the right to get a state-funded sex change is also eligible to have legal fees – expected to top $500,000 – paid as well, a fed...
BOSTON — A convicted murderer in Massachusetts who won the right to get a state-funded sex change is also eligible to have legal fees – expected to top $500,000 – paid as well, a fed...
Filed by Michael McLaughlin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,225
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (34 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tammy Rainey
03:53 AM on 09/24/2012
for thread newcomers: many posts in this thread refer to the surgery as "elective" and/or "optional.

In the medical usage of those terms, these claims are factually incorrect.

Medically, an elective surgery is one that serves no medical purpose at all and is purely cosmetic. A nose job or liposuction or botox. if you think GRS is elective in that sense then you simply don't understand the condition being treated in even the most basic sense.

Medically, "optional" refers to treatment which legitimately treats a specific medical need but which is only one of a range of alternative treatments, or which the condition being treated is not an immediate threat. More often the former than the latter. It denotes the ability to choose between more than one effective option. In this sense Michelle's case WAS at one point judged as being potentially treatable by other means (making surgery optional) but this is no longer the opinion of the doctors close to the case.

Now, it is quite true that in the NON-medical sense, this is optional...in the same sense that an uninsured free person may well "opt" not to get necessary care because of finances (say, for instance, the person who opts to have a tooth pulled rather than get a root canal because of lack of money) - but these are not cases in which the medical professional would say in a professional sense that the care was optional.
04:21 PM on 09/23/2012
I don't care how many hormones he takes, how much makeup he wears, or how much surgery this KILLER has! He will always be a MAN, as there is no way to change his DNA. Every single cell in his body contains the XY chromosome, and no amount of lawsuits can change that!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tammy Rainey
03:18 AM on 09/24/2012
thanks for the sixth grade biology lesson. Clearly there is a great deal you haven't yet learned. but i'll leave Zoe to conduct the lesson, she's so much more well versed than I am.
07:58 PM on 09/29/2012
How insulting! I happen to have a degree in biology. I used "sixth grade" terms because that seems to be the intelligence level of those who think a KILLER is entitled to have gender reassignment surgery! He may LOOK like a woman, but he will never BE a woman!
No thanks, I don't need a "rocket scientist" to conduct any lessons.
01:00 PM on 09/23/2012
2 suicide attempts?? Try for 3 save the taxpayers some money!
03:59 PM on 09/22/2012
Isn't that special. And liberals are in favor of tax increases. See where the money goes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tammy Rainey
03:37 PM on 09/22/2012
By the way - all you good citizens really deeply worried about wasting taxpayer money on the prison system: I'm sure I can confidently predict that the lot of you will be voting for Gary Johnson for president, since he advocates ending the drug war and freeing millions of Americans convicted of petty drug possession laws and doing away with forfeiture laws by which the government can seize your property even without a conviction....right?

Or are you all cool with wasting hundreds of millions of dollars to house, feed, and yes medically care for millions of Americans who did nothing more than had a few ounces of pot in their possession?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:36 PM on 09/22/2012
Seems to me that there are some "enriching" details missing somewhere along the line. The DOC must have contributed to pretty big offenses against this person, otherwise why would the attorney working for them still be "considering" whether to fight it at all, let alone just for legal fees. I'm know there's no way I'm the only one wondering about this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tammy Rainey
03:16 PM on 09/22/2012
It's no wonder people are so obsessed with ill-informed views - just look at the news video linked above. You have a sheriff bemoaning the cost of the lawsuits (ignoring the lawsuits only exists because she was denied); you have a radio jock inflating the cost of the surgery by a factor of 10 and then implying the prison is loaded with guys who can't wait to get rid of their junk; you have the DOC expressing a total loss of where they could house securely a prisoner with a vagina as if that's one of life's great mysteries.

Ugh. These are all people who are paid to know what's going on and displaying abject ignorance. It's no wonder the casual internet expert gets it wrong.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrTaban9
02:59 PM on 09/22/2012
I could care less about this he/she wanna-be, whatever the cost of the operation that we tax payors have to cover is a tiny ant hill on Mt Everest in comparison to what the pols piss away our tax money on, FOREIGN NATIONS THAT ABSOLUTELY DESPISE THIS COUNTRY AND US CITIZENS WITH SO CALLED "AID" . Here we a crying about several hundred thousand maybe? while I NEVER hear ANYONE cry about WHY THE HELL DO WE HAVE TO SUPPORT THE WORLD?. Other countries citizens so it seems GETS PRIOROTY ON HELP BEFORE OUR OWN AMERICAN PEOPLE.

So called POLS get up in arms over programs that help those here at home but gladly take our taxes and go support other Nations and their citizens. Wanna complain? THAT'S WHAT PEOPLE SHOULD BE COMPLAINING ABOUT, THE BILLIONS GOING OUT THE DOOR, NOT SOME chump change FOR SOME WANNA BE HE/SHE SEX OPERATION, that's small potatoes compared to what our POLS send across the oceans, :-(.
02:02 PM on 09/22/2012
it figures , this certifiable judge was appointed by regan
12:26 AM on 09/22/2012
I hope Cheryl's family files a civil suit against her. Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ronald Goldman's families got everything OJ owned, even his Heisman Trophy. In this case I hope Cheryl's family can even receive right down to the dollar amount of the surgery for wrongful death, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and whatever else will stick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zoe Brain
Girl Rocket Scientist
03:48 AM on 09/22/2012
I have no problem with that. I don't think anyone else would either.

But I draw the line at deliberately torturing a prisoner by denying what everyone involved, medics, DOC, everyone, acknowledges is necessary medical treatment, just because people who know nothing about the medical issues don't like it.

Yes, medicare, medicaid and most insurance policies don't cover it either, despite the AMA, APA etc calling for them to do so, because the treatment is *necessary* and people die without it. That's wrong, unjust... but not against the constitution.

Treating prisoners with such barbarity, effectively torturing them, is.

Rather than allowing torture of prisoners, maybe we should pass laws so that the law-abiding poor aren't tortured and treated worse than convicted murderers by the current system.
09:47 AM on 09/22/2012
they will die with out a sex change? ok
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:29 PM on 09/21/2012
You can 'buy' a doctor to say anything these days it seems. Medically necessary, you gotta be kidding....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tammy Rainey
03:18 PM on 09/22/2012
if you could buy a doctor to say "anything" then, pray tell, why is it that these doctors were paid for by the state who WANTED them to say "not necessary" and they said "necessary"? She's not hiring them, the state is. Why couldn't they find at least a majority to say what they wanted to hear if the docs were on the take?

In the future, you might want to apply a little logic BEFORE you post something irrational.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:03 PM on 09/22/2012
I stand by my statement that you can buy a doctor to say anything. So called 'experts' regularly pimp themselves out to jurists. This is no secret. You could probably get a doctor to say a hair transplant is medically necessary if your shopped around enough.
07:01 PM on 09/21/2012
What in God's name is wrong with this country?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zoe Brain
Girl Rocket Scientist
03:59 AM on 09/22/2012
You treat the law-abiding poor worse than the constitution requires you treat convicted murderers, that's what.

Prisoners are required by the 8th amendment to be treated with the absolute minimum standards consistent with human dignity and a civilised society. There's no such requirement for those outside jail. You think maybe there should be?
09:45 AM on 09/22/2012
i agree. which one of us would get free sex change or anything medically when we killed someone. In one jail or prison don't remember which, in Arizona they have expensive flooring and can't go 1 day without air conditioning that are in the jails. Have to have heat.. 3 meals a day. How many people are living without any of that? They have it made. They also get free schooling to get law degrees or what ever.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvabugg2
I have gone to find myself.....
01:49 PM on 09/21/2012
Unfreakingbelievable! Our tax dollars are paying for that. Has our judicial system lost it's collective mind? The judge who agreed to this should be disbarred! This is outrageous!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hazumu
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
02:43 AM on 09/22/2012
No.

Our judicial system is doing what our countries' Founding Fathers designed it to do - preserve basic dignity and respect.

The judge should be praised for Doing The Right Thing even though he knew it would be almost universally unpopular. He found in favour of The Bill Of Rights. Which, by the way, has NO exemption for prisoners. In fact, the 8th Amendment specifically covers them (It does NOT say "Prisoners Lose All Rights", like some wish to believe.)

There are criminals who are sentenced to Life Without Parole (LWOP) who committed much more heinous crimes. The prisons use medical boards to determine the necessity of medical care. If warranted by the medical boards, these heinous criminals get heart bypasses, kidney dialysis, hip replacements, cataract surgery, etc., at Taxpayer expense.

But these criminals are normal appearing.

M. Kosilek is, as has been noted by commenters in this and other articles on the subject, a 'freak,' 'pervert,' 'pedophile', etc., etc., etc. Thus, 'normal people' feel entitled to demand that the medical experts who determined the only viable course of treatment be overruled via Tyranny By Majority - because M. Kosilek is not a 'normal person,' but an icky transSEXual.

The judge knew EXACTLY what he was in for, but had the stones to rule in favour of our Constitutional Bill of Rights. Believe me, you WANT that amendment upheld.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvabugg2
I have gone to find myself.....
11:17 AM on 09/22/2012
Personally, I would not allow any medical treatment to these murderers, child rapists and molesters unless it was necessary to save their lives. They committed felonies and so therefor should have no right to sue anyone. This is just one of many examples of the dumbing down of our society. Now that his has been allowed to pass, every felonious low life will feel free to sue over the most minute thing, tying up our legal system unnecessarily. I'm just dumbfounding that you find this perfectly alright. Why should he have any right to anything, he took a human life. I don't care if he's transsexual or not, that's not the point.
07:19 PM on 09/23/2012
First of all, you really need to stop using the 8 amendment in such a manner that reflects you knowing more than you actually do. The prison officials are inflicting no kind of punishment on this convicted gentleman. If he were to have any PHYSICAL ailments, Mr. Kosilek would get medically treated. However, a desire to surgically alter his body in a way that is not medically necessary. Cosmetic surgery should not be offered to these prisoners.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hazumu
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
03:33 AM on 09/21/2012
Ninety-eight percent of the posters to this article are angry. But I don't think it's really about M. Kosilek and the surgery that medical specialist after medical specialist said is - in this case - life-saving.

This case is just a nucleation site - a point where something larger that's simmering in the background can get boiling.

The issue really is that prisoners HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to be treated better than law-abiding, follow-the-rules working stiffs.

I've heard numerous people complain that we keep murderers alive, and why don't we just kill 'em. Like it will save taxpayer dollars.

They're flying Space Shuttle Endeavour around the country - on a tour - before finally dropping it off in Los Angeles. Who pays for that? Taxpayers. I don't hear anybody complaining about that. 54% of every tax dollar goes to 'defense'. I don't hear anybody complaining about that (especially when 99% of people don't have to serve if they don't want to.)

If the cost of M. Kosilek's surgery 12 years ago divided evenly by Massachussets taxpayers - 2/3d of a cent. The cost of fighting the judgement, along with the continuing medical care to deal with the depression and suicidal ideation, per taxpayer - 33 cents and rising.

Or, as Zoe Brain keeps saying, let's repeal the 8th Amendment and start turning America's penal system into a model of third-world corrections.
01:27 PM on 09/22/2012
You have a gorgeous smile there Hazumu :) I know that's completely out of left field & unrelated to the topic here, but it's true!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tammy Rainey
03:24 PM on 09/22/2012
"If the cost of M. Kosilek's surgery 12 years ago divided evenly by Massachussets taxpayers - 2/3d of a cent. The cost of fighting the judgement, along with the continuing medical care to deal with the depression and suicidal ideation, per taxpayer - 33 cents and rising."

Ooooo! More "doin' the math!" I hope you don't mind if I borrow this one.
02:33 AM on 09/21/2012
Something wrong with the goverment in that state. Why not just let him/her out and buy them a house and a car also??? New clothes and anything else he/she might need. I bet the taxpayers are loving this one!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tammy Rainey
03:26 PM on 09/22/2012
Ummm...no. Reading comprehension much? A FEDERAL judge ruling under the direction of the FEDERAL CONSTITUTION reached this conclusion. The STATE was on your side, and LOST because it's position - and yours - is unconstitutional. i find it hilarious that internet experts bloviate about this case with all the conviction they can muster and yet can't even take note of the most basic and obvious FACTS of the case before posting. It's happened all through this thread.