The Treasury Department's bailout watchdog wants to stop using the flawed Libor rate in setting the terms of bank bailouts.
Too bad she wasn't around four years ago when the bailouts began.
“We can’t continue to use for TARP a measure in which there’s no confidence or assurance that it’s reliable, which could potentially be subject to manipulation,” Christy Romero, special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, told Bloomberg.
Libor, or the London Interbank Offered Rate, is an interest rate that affects borrowing costs throughout the economy, from floating-rate mortgages to more than $350 trilion in derivatives contracts. As the benchmark for global lending, Libor might have seemed a natural choice for setting the terms of the government's bailouts of banks and American International Group during the crisis. Borrowers all over the world routinely use Libor. The government used it as the base interest rate -- or in the case of AIG, ultimately, the only interest rate at which bailed-out banks and AIG had to pay back their loans.
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who helped set the terms of those bailouts, has said the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve had no choice but to use Libor in the myriad lending programs that propped up the financial sector.
Romero directly contradicted that assertion in her interview with Bloomberg, saying that replacing Libor is "easy to do because there are alternative interest rates in the contracts" for the TARP programs still in operation. There were also plenty of other rates available that the government could have used, including the federal funds rate set by the Federal Reserve (also manipulated, but legally).
Bloomberg published its Sept. 21 interview with Romero on Tuesday, the same day the British Bankers Association announced its desire to disown Libor, after having overseen the rate, poorly, since its inception. A day earlier, Gary Gensler, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, told European Parliament that Libor needed to be taken out to a field and put down.
The problem with using Libor for bailouts during the crisis was that it was completely fake -- even more fake than usual -- and Geithner knew it, or should have at least.
Libor is set every day by a group of 16 banks, which all report the rates they have to pay to borrow from each other. During the crisis, they weren't lending to each other, so that created a bit of a problem right there. And banks certainly didn't want to confess what they really thought they'd have to pay to borrow in the market: Doing so would have crippled investor confidence in them. And so they all reported lower borrowing costs than they should have, making Libor a fraud.
Even before the crisis, Libor was at constant risk of manipulation by traders trying to push it around to help out their derivatives trades. Barclays Capital was the first to confess to such shenanigans, and it seems Royal Bank of Scotland is not far behind, according to a separate Bloomberg report on Monday.
Despite having knowledge of Libor's flaws by the time of the crisis, Geithner allowed Libor to be used in loans to banks under the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF, and to American International Group, rubber-stamping Libor's legitimacy and potentially costing taxpayers millions, if not billions, of dollars.
AIG, for example, managed to get its initially painful bailout terms renegotiated in March 2009, when Geithner was Treasury Secretary, to a loan whose only interest rate was Libor. How much money did that save AIG and cost the taxpayer? Of course, the taxpayer also owned a lot of AIG stock, so you could argue the taxpayer won out in the deal one way or the other.
In any event, now that most of the harm has been done, Romero wants to finally shake Libor out of what's left of the government's bailout programs, including TALF and the Treasury's Public-Private Investment Program.
She has asked that Fed and Treasury to make it happen, and they have said they'll get right back to her on it.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.