Huffpost Politics
Jason Cherkis Headshot
Ryan Grim Headshot

Mitt Romney Vetoed Flood Prep Funding In 2004, Blamed For Subsequent Flooding

Posted: Updated:
Print Article
MITT ROMNEY
Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign event at Avon Lake High School Monday, Oct. 29, 2012, in Avon Lake, Ohio. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak) | AP

WASHINGTON -- In the spring of 2004, Peabody, Mass., got drenched with rain, which flooded the downtown area. After the storm, then-Gov. Mitt Romney asked President George W. Bush to declare Essex, Middlesex and Suffolk Counties federal disaster areas, according to the Boston Globe.

That fall, the state legislature proposed spending $5.7 million on a flood prevention project to protect against future floods. Those funds would be matched by $22 million in federal money.

Romney vetoed it. This week, Romney has come under fire for suggesting that the federal government get out of the business of disaster relief. But his record in Massachusetts doesn't lend much support to the suggestion that states can handle it alone.

During the time of the Peabody fight, John Barrett, then the Democratic mayor of North Adams, was the vice president of the Massachusetts Mayors Association. He said the issue of flooding in Peabody was critical and that local officials had reached out to the legislature for help. "Every time it rained, it wiped out their downtown," Barrett told HuffPost.

Barrett chalked Romney's veto of the Peabody project up to a lack of familiarity with infrastructure in the state.

"This was not unusual for him. He didn’t understand infrastructure improvements. It was just the bottom line. He never visited communities. He never understood the issues. He never sat down with mayors or city managers. He never understood why those things were in the budget," Barrett said. "That money was requested by locals. It was a major league problem.”

Dan Bosley, a former Democratic state representative in Western Massachusetts, agreed. "I think it was just the fact that Romney didn't understand these issues." He said he never saw Romney out with a rain slicker checking on towns like current Gov. Deval Patrick has done.

"I don't think it was because he was heartless, he just didn't know. That's how he ran his state," Bosley said. "His understanding of why you have government, I don't think he ever had it."

The Boston Globe reported that September that local officials were outraged, and doubly insulted that Romney claimed to have vetoed the money due to a lack of sufficient information.

Peabody officials yesterday lashed out at Governor Mitt Romney's decision to block $5.7 million to pay for a flood control project in downtown Peabody. Romney blocked the money as part of $76 million in election-year spending he vetoed last week. At a State House press conference Friday, Romney said he had tried to contact Peabody officials to obtain more information about the funding, but was unable to reach anyone. Yesterday, state Senator Frederick E. Berry said ... "We hand-delivered all kinds of information. They had all the information they needed ... I don’t want to use the word 'lie,' but ... how he could say he didn't get the information? That's not true." Yesterday, Romney's communications director, Eric Ferhnstrom, said the governor stands by his statement. "Governor Romney is not a rubber stamp for the expenditure of taxpayer funds. If there is no information to support a particular expenditure, our inclination is to be cautious and to wait until a rationale is put forward," Ferhnstrom said. "In this case, we endeavored to get answers to our questions but none were forthcoming. We would be happy to take another look and if it appears to be a necessary and worthwhile expense we will include it in the next" spending bill the administration proposes.

In May 2006, Peabody flooded again, and local officials quickly blamed Romney, and slammed him for doing a tour of the disaster area. As the Associated Press reported:

Romney's critics saw more than a little political hype in the media blitz. "The first thing I wouldn't do is showboat for the national cameras and say I was going to prevent looting on the North Shore," Democratic candidate for governor Chris Gabrieli said ... Critics also faulted Romney's 2004 veto of a $5.7 million flood control project in Peabody, hit hard by the rains, and his request for just half a million dollars for the state's dam safety office. Senate Ways and Means Chairwoman Therese Murray, D-Plymouth said, "Peabody today is under water" because of Romney's action. Romney defended the veto, saying he wasn't given a full explanation of how the money would be spent.

Also on HuffPost:

Politicians React To Sandy
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

Mitt Romney opens a stunning 7-point lead over President Obama in ...

Romney China-Made Jeep Comments Fuel Campaign Flashpoint

Romney campaigns in Midwest

Mitt Romney's voodoo spending cuts

Mitt Romney talks bipartisanship, drawing doubters

Iowa Newspaper Backs Mitt Romney

Mitt Romney returns to county, slams president at Avon Lake stop

Mitt Romney Reiterates He`d Cut FEMA, in Spite of Sandy`s Devastation!

Bill Clinton: Mitt Romney's Jeep-to-China ad is 'biggest load of bull in the ...

President Obama, Mitt Romney look for right time to resume campaign following ...

Joss Whedon: Mitt Romney Right for 'Zombie Apocalypse'

As Governor, Mitt Romney Was Slow To Respond To Disasters In His State ...

Romney urges prayers for those in Sandy's path

Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan Cancel Campaign Events Due To Hurricane Sandy

Repent, Ye East Coast Flooded-Out Sinners

Mitt Romney in 2011: 'We Cannot Afford' Federal Disaster Relief

Romney's Mormon Background May Shape His Anti-FEMA Stance

 
  Obama Romney
Obama Romney
332 206
Obama leading
Obama won
Romney leading
Romney won
Popular Vote
33 out of 100 seats are up for election. 51 are needed for a majority.
Democrat leading
Democrat won
Holdover
Republican leading
Republican won
Democrats* Republicans
Current Senate 53 47
Seats gained or lost +2 -2
New Total 55 45
* Includes two independent senators expected to caucus with the Democrats: Angus King (Maine) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.).
All 435 seats are up for election. 218 are needed for a majority.
Democrat leading
Democrat won
Republican leading
Republican won
Democrats Republicans
Seats won 201 234
Click for Full Results