After years of legal wrangling, Yosemite National Park officials said Tuesday that they have identified a detailed plan to protect the Merced River that should satisfy longtime rivals.
In 2009, under a lawsuit brought by river conservationists, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the park to come up with a specific maximum number of people that, at one time, can safely use areas that border the river.
Because the Merced River is designated "wild and scenic," federal protections apply to land a quarter-mile from the river, which includes parts of the heavily trafficked Yosemite Valley.
"They have to make their capacity (number) meaningful and not just a receding target," said Greg Adair, co-founder of the conservation group Friends of Yosemite Valley and lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
The Merced River plan, which was submitted for early review in March, outlined five alternative plans to protect the park's section of the river that flows through the Yosemite Valley.
Park officials now have identified their preferred alternative, which limits daily visitors in the eastern part of Yosemite Valley to about 19,900 people -- a level similar to average usage, according to the plan.
"We've worked with the plaintiff through the process," said Kathleen Morse, chief of planning with the park. "They've been part of our public meetings and process. The spirit of the settlement agreement has been followed."
The Merced River plan now in its final stages will be the third proposed plan by park officials after more than a decade of court battles.
Emily Schrepf, program manager with the National Parks Conservation Association, said she hasn't had time to fully review the specifics of the document, but she applauded the park's work on this most recent plan.
"They've gone above and beyond what is necessary as far has doing scientific research," she said "We're confident that they've done what they should have as far as public outreach."
Adair said he hasn't had a chance to review the voluminous document either, but said further legal action was not off the table.
"I can't say that our group is optimistic at this point," he said. "We've had 10 years of seeing the park get close to making the right decision and then not doing it. Yes, we reserve the right to litigate this plan."
The park's preferred alternative calls for major infrastructure adjustments in Yosemite Valley, including moving Camp 6 farther north, away from the river.
Commercial services also would be reduced, according to the plan. The park would eliminate the raft and bicycle rental company in Curry Village, as well as the ice rink and day-use horseback rides. The swimming pool at Yosemite Lodge would be removed.
"We have a very limited area to work with, so it's a tradeoff," Morse said. "We came to the conclusion that people can still bring in rafts and bikes."
Several campsites would be moved away from the river, but campsites would increase overall. Day-use parking also would increase.
Under the preferred alternative, officials said, there would be significant changes to the traffic pattern in Yosemite Valley to reduce congestion.
The public comment period for the document closes April 18. The final plan will be submitted in July.
Reporter Joshua Emerson Smith can be reached at (209) 385-2486 or jsmith@mercedsunstar.com.
Under Yosemite National Park's preferred alternative for the Merced River plan:
-- Visitors per day in the eastern part of Yosemite Valley would be capped at 19,900.
-- 203 acres of meadow and riparian habitat would be restored.
-- Campsites in all river segments would increase 28 percent, and in Yosemite Valley 37 percent.
-- Day-use parking spaces would increase 11 percent in Yosemite Valley. ___
(c)2013 the Merced Sun-Star (Merced, Calif.)
Visit the Merced Sun-Star (Merced, Calif.) at www.mercedsunstar.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.