WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Tuesday he will bring home within a year about half of the 66,000 U.S. troops now in Afghanistan, shrinking the force to the size he found it when he entered the White House vowing to reinvigorate a stalemated war.
More will leave the battlefield in 2014, he said, but he did not spell out what U.S. military presence would remain after 2014, when the U.S.-led combat mission is scheduled to end. The stated goal is to prepare Afghanistan's army and police to handle the Taliban insurgency largely on their own by then.
Obama said that his war goals could be achieved by bringing 34,000 U.S. troops home by this time next year, leaving somewhere between 32,000 and 34,000 to support and train Afghan forces. That is about the number in Afghanistan when he took office in January 2009; in a series of moves designed to reverse the Taliban's battlefield momentum, he tripled the total American force before starting to scale it back in the summer of 2011.
Obama's new move, announced in his State of the Union speech, coincides with a major shake-up in his war command. Gen. Joseph Dunford took over Sunday for Gen. John Allen as the commander of all allied forces in Afghanistan, and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is planning to retire as soon as his replacement is confirmed. Obama has nominated former Sen. Chuck Hagel to take the Pentagon post, and the Senate Armed Services Committee voted 14-11 Tuesday to advance the nomination to the full Senate for a vote possibly later this week.
Without going into specifics, Obama said the phase-out of American combat troops in Afghanistan will continue in 2014.
"This drawdown will continue. And by the end of next year, our war in Afghanistan will be over," he said, adding that al-Qaida is no longer the threat it was on 9/11.
"The organization that attacked us on 9/11 is a shadow of its former self," he said. "Different al-Qaida affiliates and extremist groups have emerged – from the Arabian Peninsula to Africa. The threat these groups pose is evolving. But to meet this threat, we don't need to send tens of thousands of our sons and daughters abroad, or occupy other nations."
Obama's decision also reflects Obama's determination to wind down a war that is the longest in America's history. He has many other security problems to consider around the globe – from North Korea's development of nuclear weapons to civil war in Syria to the worrisome spread of al-Qaida affiliated terrorist groups in the Middle East and North Africa.
The White House said the president made his decision about 2013 troop reductions based on recommendations by the military and his national security advisers, as well as consultations with allies such as Britain and Germany and talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
The White House did not spell out the pace at which the 34,000 troops will be withdrawn over the coming year. Defense officials said it's likely that the bulk of them will be kept through summer. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because details of the withdrawal had not been announced.
Private analysts are divided on the wisdom of accelerating the withdrawal of American forces. Michael O'Hanlon of the Brookings Institution wrote that he believes the current U.S. troop level should remain until autumn, when a seasonal lull in Taliban activity usually begins. "The president should now be patient with what happens over the next eight months," O'Hanlon wrote in an opinion piece for Politico, adding that Dunford needs time to consolidate progress in eastern Afghanistan.
The U.S. is still finalizing plans for the size and scope of its military presence after the allied combat mission ends in December 2014.
Stephen Biddle, a professor of international affairs at George Washington University, said the decision on post-2014 force levels is more important than the pace of 2013 withdrawals.
"The real issue is what you're ultimately going to draw down to – what does the end of this road look like, not the weigh stations," Biddle said.
Officials have said the White House is considering a range of options that would leave between 5,000 and 10,000 troops beyond 2014, but it also is hoping for help from NATO allies. Those troops would limit their missions to training Afghan troops and hunting down terrorists.
Obama discussed the next phases of the drawdown with Karzai during a meeting in Washington last month, their first since Obama's re-election. They agreed to accelerate their timetable for putting Afghan forces in the lead combat role nationwide, moving that transition up from the summer to the spring.
A persistent worry is that pulling out of Afghanistan too quickly will leave the battle-scarred country vulnerable to collapse. In a worst-case scenario, that could allow the Taliban to regain power and revert to the role they played in the years before 9/11 as protectors of al-Qaida terrorists bent on striking the U.S.
Many Americans, however, are weary of the war, according to public opinion polls, and are skeptical of any claim that Afghanistan is worth more U.S. blood. Registered voters are roughly split between those who say the U.S. should remove all troops and those who favor leaving some troops in place for counterterrorism efforts, according to a recent Fox News poll.
Associated Press writer Lolita C. Baldor and AP Broadcast correspondent Sagar Meghani contributed to this report.
Also on HuffPost:
Justice Alito Mouths 'Not True'
During the 2010 State of the Union, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito mouthed the words <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/27/alito-not-true_n_439672.html" target="_hplink">"not true,"</a> in response to President Barack Obama's statement that the Court's ruling in the <em>Citizens United</em> case had "open[ed] the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign corporations -- to spend without limit in our elections."
Attendees Caught Sleeping?
After President George W. Bush's address in 2007, many outlets reported that Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) had fallen asleep. However, as <em>The New York Times</em> <a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/01/24/state-of-the-union-lullaby/" target="_hplink">pointed out</a>, McCain was likely reading a copy of the speech and just appeared to be dozing off. During the 2010 address, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano was also <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/27/democrats-asleep-reid-napolitano-sotu_n_439717.html" target="_hplink">caught</a> looking like she was taking a nap, while Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was spotted <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgpwViyAlxo&feature=player_embedded" target="_hplink">yawning</a> while his colleagues applauded President Obama's remarks.
Bush Criticized For Using Term 'Democrat Majority'
In his <a href="http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/196277-2" target="_hplink">2007 address</a>, President Bush began his speech on a bipartisan foot by commending new Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), saying "I congratulate the Democrat majority." By eliminating the syllable "-ic" from the word "Democratic," Bush caused <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/24/AR2007012402469.html" target="_hplink">a stir</a> among liberals. The phrase "Democrat party" has long been an epithet used by Republicans to express contempt for their opponents. However, it's unclear whether the omission was intentional. The text of Bush's speech said "Democratic party," suggesting that the use of the term was accidental.
Democrats Boo President Bush
After Bush claimed in his 2005 address that Social Security will be "exhausted and bankrupt" by 2042, Democratic members of Congress booed and heckled the president. Many pundits called an "unprecedented" reaction. However, as Media Matters <a href="pointed out" target="_hplink">pointed out</a>, Republicans had similarly booed President Bill Clinton during previous State of the Union addresses.
Bush Coins 'Axis Of Evil'
In his <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/onpolitics/transcripts/sou012902.htm" target="_hplink">2002 address</a>, President Bush highlighted the threats posed by North Korea, Iran and Iraq. "States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world," he said.
Clinton Replaces 'Livable' With 'Liberal'
President Clinton made a Freudian slip during <a href="http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/SOTU00/sotu-text.html" target="_hplink">his final State of the Union address</a> in 2000, twice replacing the word "livable" with the word "liberal," and then abruptly correcting himself: <blockquote> Last year, the Vice President launched a new effort to make communities more liberal -- livable -- (laughter) -- liberal, I know. (Laughter and applause.) Wait a minute, I've got a punchline now. That's this year's agenda; last year was livable, right? (Laughter.) That's what Senator Lott is going to say in the commentary afterwards. (Laughter.) To make our communities more livable. This is big business. This is a big issue. What does that mean? You ask anybody that lives in an unlivable community, and they'll tell you. They want their kids to grow up next to parks, not parking lots; the parents don't have to spend all their time stalled in traffic when they could be home with their children. Tonight, I ask you to support new funding for the following things, to make American communities for liberal -- livable. (Laughter and applause.) I've done pretty well with this speech, but I can't say that. (Applause.)</blockquote>
Clinton Bypasses Impeachment Troubles
Despite being in the middle of his trial, Bill Clinton made no explicit mention of impeachment during the 1999 State of the Union. The closest he came was alluding to his troubles: "Yet perhaps in the daily press of events, in the clash of controversy, we do not see our own time for what it truly is: a new dawn for America."
Reagan Leads With George Washington Joke
In 1982, President Ronald Reagan began <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2QFLsxeEl5I#!" target="_hplink">his first official State of the Union address</a> with a joke that poked fun at the media: <blockquote>"President Washington began this tradition in 1790, after reminding the nation that the destiny of self-government and the preservation of the sacred fire of liberty is finally staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people. "For our friends in the press who place a high premium on accuracy, let me say, I did not actually hear George Washington say that." </blockquote>
Nixon Calls For End Of Watergate Investigation
Six months before resigning from office in disgrace, President Richard Nixon called on Congress to end the Watergate investigation. During <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Archives/video/nixon-addresses-watergate-burglary-9665277" target="_hplink">his 1974 address</a>, he said, "I believe the time has come to bring that investigation and the other investigations of this matter to an end. One year of Watergate is enough."
LBJ Introduces Great Society
President Lyndon B. Johnson introduced his Great Society program during <a href="http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/speeches.hom/650104.asp" target="_hplink">his 1965 address</a>. The domestic policy was aimed at eliminating poverty and racial injustice. "The Great Society asks not how much, but how good; not only how to create wealth but how to use it; not only how fast we are going, but where we are headed," he said. "It proposes as the first test for a nation: the quality of its people."
Lincoln Foreshadows Emancipation Proclamation
During his <a href="http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/congress.htm" target="_hplink">1862 State of the Union address</a>, President Abraham Lincoln foreshadowed the Emancipation Proclamation, which he would sign just a month later. "In giving freedom to the slave we assure freedom to the free -- honorable alike in what we give and what we preserve," he said.
James Monroe Outlines His Eponymous Doctrine
In his <a href="http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=23&page=transcript" target="_hplink">1823 address</a> to Congress, President James Monroe outlined what would become to be known as the "Monroe Doctrine," a key foundation of American foreign policy. As he declared, "The American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers."