Newly minted Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Tuesday showed why big banks are not her biggest fans, grilling Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke about the risks and fairness of having banks that are "too big to fail."
Warren (D-Mass.) questioned Bernanke during his latest semiannual appearance before the Senate Banking Committee to discuss the economy and monetary policy. Warren pressed the Fed chairman about whether the government would bail out the largest banks again, as it did during the financial crisis.
"We've now understood this problem for nearly five years," she said. "So when are we gonna get rid of 'too big to fail?'"
Warren also asked whether big banks should repay taxpayers for the billions of dollars they save in borrowing costs because of the credit market's belief that they won't be allowed to fail, repeatedly citing a recent Bloomberg View study estimating that the biggest banks essentially get a government subsidy of $83 billion a year, nearly matching their annual profits.
Though Bernanke questioned the accuracy of the $83 billion figure, he admitted that big banks get some subsidy. But he said the market was wrong to give banks any subsidy at all (in the form of lower borrowing costs), insisting that the government will in fact let banks fail. The 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law has given policymakers the tools to safely shut down big, failing banks, he claimed.
But when repeatedly pressed by Warren, Bernanke's confidence seemed to waver.
"The subsidy is coming because of market expectations that the government would bail out these firms if they failed," Bernanke said. "Those expectations are incorrect. We have an orderly liquidation authority. Even in the crisis, we -- uh, uh -- in the cases of AIG, for example, we wiped out the shareholders..."
"Excuse me, though, Mr. Chairman," Warren said. "You did not wipe out the shareholders of the largest financial institutions, did you, the big banks?
"Because we didn't have the tools," Bernanke replied. "Now we could -- now we have the tools."
Later, when pressed again by Warren, Bernanke suggested that the government's tools to wind down a big bank that is failing were still a work in progress -- or at least that financial markets have not yet been convinced of their power.
"Some of these rules take time to develop -- um, uh, the orderly liquidation authority, I think we've made progress on that," he said. "We've got the living wills -- I think we're moving in the right direction ... We do have a plan, and I think it's moving in the right direction."
"Any idea about when we're gonna arrive in the right direction?" Warren said.
"It's not a zero-one kind of thing," Bernanke stammered in response. "Over time we will see increasing, uh, increasing market expectations that these institutions can fail."
He later added, "As somebody who's spent a lot of late nights dealing with these problems, I would very much like to have confidence we can close down a large institution without causing damage to the economy."
Bernanke suggested that banks would eventually lose some of the benefits of size and would shrink themselves voluntarily -- news that might surprise JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who was again extolling the benefits of his bank's size even as Bernanke spoke.
Warren also pointed out that big banks are probably loath to give up any market subsidy -- $83 billion or otherwise.
"Big banks are getting a terrific break, and little banks are just getting smashed," Warren said.
"I agree with you 100 percent," Bernanke said.
Also on HuffPost:
Donald Trump's Video Gaffe
Days before the presidential election, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/profile/donald-trump/">Donald Trump</a> set eyeballs rolling the world over by posting a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgOq9pBkY0I&feature=youtu.be&hd=1">YouTube video</a> making President Obama an offer he wouldn't be able to refuse, to use a cliche not far removed <a href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=26987232&l=9c7529f686&id=153080620724">from the real estate mogul’s own words</a>. The billionaire <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/05/trump-obama-born-in-kenya-124569.html">birther</a> gave the President a week to produce his college records and passport applications in return for a $5 million donation to the charity of Obama’s choice. His move derided in the press as, at best, a ploy for attention -- and needless to say,the President didn't bite. At the time, Trump told Forbes he'd had positive feedback from the video. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mlf45jfkj/thor-batista/">Read more at Forbes</a>.
Silvio Berlusconi: Scandal As Usual
He remains on trial for alleged sex with an underage prostitute. He was sentenced to a year in jail in October for tax fraud. Yet Italian media billionaire and former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi was still toying with the idea of running for re-election as of a few weeks ago. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/silvio-berlusconi/9748985/Silvio-Berlusconi-announces-engagement-to-27-year-old.html">He also introduced the media to his 27-year-old fiance in December</a>. He's 76, and still married to his second wife. Just another year in the life of the Bunga Bunga king. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mlf45jfkj/thor-batista/">Read more at Forbes</a>.
Koch brothers' "Partisan" Pandering?
America's richest brothers Charles and David (pictured) Koch are rarely out of the headlines, but <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2012/10/15/koch-brothers-pro-romney-letter-to-staff-is-koch-pac-non-partisan-as-they-claim/">October's accusations were more serious</a> than the usual implications of secret electioneering. Shortly before the presidential election, liberal political magazine In These Times <a href="http://inthesetimes.com/article/14017/koch_industries_sends_45000_employees_pro_romney_mailing">obtained and published a packet</a> of voting information sent to 45,000 employees of Koch Industries paper subsidiary Georgia-Pacific. The materials included a list of Koch-endorsed candidates — those who “have received support from a Koch company or Koch PAC”, the company’s political action committee. For Oregon staffers, that list was comprised solely of Republicans: 14 of them at state level, plus the Romney/Ryan presidential ticket. Koch Industries denied any partisanship, but <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2012/10/15/koch-brothers-pro-romney-letter-to-staff-is-koch-pac-non-partisan-as-they-claim/">said the company supported "market-based policies and economic freedom."</a> <a href="http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mlf45jfkj/thor-batista/">Read more at Forbes</a>.
5-Hour Energy: Death Investigation
Manoj Bhargava, the one-time monk turned energy shot entrepreneur, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2012/02/08/manoj-bhargava-the-mystery-monk-making-billions-with-5-hour-energy/">made his debut on the 2012 Forbes World's Billionaires list</a> thanks to 5-Hour Energy, his two-ounce cocktail of caffeine and B vitamins that flies off the shelves at Wal-Marts and bodegas nationwide. In November, the FDA announced it was investigating Bhargava's product in relation to 13 deaths, calling the safety of energy supplements into question. The <a href="http://www.mlive.com/business/detroit/index.ssf/2012/12/5-hour_energy_takes_to_youtube.html">billionaire took to YouTube in December to defend 5-Hour-Energy</a> -- a rare foray into the public eye for the quiet entrepreneur. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mlf45jfkj/thor-batista/">Read more at Forbes</a>.
Rausing Family Tragedy
This year's most bizarre billionaire story is also the saddest. In July, Hans Kristian Rausing, 49-year-old <a href="http://www.forbes.com/profile/hans-rausing/">scion of a Swedish milk carton fortune</a>, was arrested on suspicion of drug possession in South London. Police then searched his five-story mansion in the city’s pricey Cadogan Place and<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2012/07/10/drug-addict-billionaire-packaging-heir-arrested-as-socialite-wife-found-dead/"> found the body of his American-born wife Eva</a>. The couple had struggled with addiction for years; Eva had once been arrested trying to smuggle heroin and crack into a party at London's US Embassy. It emerged during police investigations that Hans had been living alongside Eva's corpse for some weeks. He was <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2012/07/18/billionaire-hans-kristian-rausing-charged-with-preventing-burial-after-living-with-wifes-dead-body-eva-rausing-kemeny-tetra-pak/">charged with "preventing the lawful and decent burial" of his late wife</a>, who was subsequently found to have died of a cocaine overdose. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mlf45jfkj/thor-batista/">Read more at Forbes</a>.
Pinault's Baby Mama Drama
French fashion tycoon Francois-Henri Pinault comes from a family worth some $13 billion. His great wealth was at the crux of <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2012/05/03/billionaire-baby-daddy-drama-linda-evangelista-takes-fashion-mogul-francois-pinault-to-court/">a nasty court case involving his one-time girlfriend, supermodel Linda Evangelista</a>, who claimed the billionaire heir hadn't paid a cent (or euro, as the case may be) in child support for the son he fathered five years earlier. Since then, Pinault has married another beauty, actress Salma Hayek (pictured with the Gucci mogul). Pinault implied in court that he thought Evangelista may have gotten pregnant on purpose during their brief relationship. Lawyers for the cover girl countered that he'd lavished money and attention on his child with Hayek while ignoring his son Augie. The couple settled for an undisclosed amount in May. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mlf45jfkj/thor-batista/">Read more at Forbes</a>.