Huffpost Business

Richard Fisher Says Too-Big-To-Fail Banks Need To Be Broken Up

Posted: Updated:
FISHER TOO BIG TO FAIL
AP


(Adds details from speech)

By Pedro Nicolaci da Costa

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md., March 16 (Reuters) - The largest U.S. banks are "practitioners of crony capitalism," need to be broken up to ensure they are no longer considered too big to fail, and continue to threaten financial stability, a top Federal Reserve official said on Saturday.

Richard Fisher, president of the Dallas Fed, has been a critic of Wall Street's disproportionate influence since the financial crisis. But he was now taking his message to an unusual audience for a central banker: a high-profile Republican political action committee.

Fisher said the existence of banks that are seen as likely to receive government bailouts if they fail gives them an unfair advantage, hurting economic competitiveness.

"These institutions operate under a privileged status that exacts an unfair tax upon the American people," he said on the last day of the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).

"They represent not only a threat to financial stability but to fair and open competition  (and) are the practitioners of crony capitalism and not the agents of democratic capitalism that makes our country great," said Fisher, who has also been a vocal opponent of the Fed's unconventional monetary stimulus policies.

Fisher's vision pits him directly against Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, who recently argued during congressional testimony that regulators had made significant progress in addressing the problem of too big to fail. Bernanke asserted that market expectations that large financial institutions would be rescued is wrong.

But Fisher said mega banks still have a significant funding advantage over its competitors, as well as other advantages. To address this problem, he called for a rolling back of deposit insurance so that it would extend only to deposits of commercial banks, not the investment arms of bank holding companies.

"At the Dallas Fed, we believe that whatever the precise subsidy number is, it exists, it is significant, and it allows the biggest banking organizations, along with their many nonbank subsidiaries - investment firms, securities lenders, finance companies - to grow larger and riskier," he said.

Fisher argued Dodd-Frank financial reforms were overly complex and therefore counterproductive.

"Regulators cannot enforce rules that are not easily understood," he said. (Reporting by Pedro Nicolaci da Costa; editing by Gunna Dickson)

Also on HuffPost:

11 Lies About The Fed
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

Fed's Fisher Takes 'Too Big to Fail' Message to CPAC - WSJ.com

Fed's Fisher Keeps 'Too Big to Fail' Debate Alive - Real Time ...

Ending 'Too Big to Fail' - Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Fisher says too-big-to-fail banks are "crony" capitalists

Fed's Fisher Courts Right With 'Too Big to Fail' Talk

US needs better approach to addressing "too big to fail" problem: Fed official