Huffpost Business

Big Banks Face $100 Billion Legal Tab (And That's If They're Lucky)

Posted: Updated:
TOO BIG TO FAIL LEGAL TAB
Too-big-to-fail banks face a $100 billion legal tab, at least, led by Bank of America. (Photo by John Adkisson/Getty Images) | Getty Images
Print

You may think that being a too-big-to-fail bank is just one long, consequence-free romp, but it does come at some cost: an enormous and growing legal tab that will probably swell beyond $100 billion, all told.

See, when you're an immense sea-creature of a bank, you naturally have your tendrils in a lot of different holes, which means you're ever more likely to get yourself into trouble by doing stuff like accidentally-on-purpose manipulating interest rates or lying to investors about the quality of putrid mortgage junk you sell them.

Of course, you're far too big to go to jail, so you don't ever have to worry about that. But that doesn't mean your victims won't come after you with the one thing they have at their disposal: lawyers.

Big banks around the world are probably looking at $100 billion in legal costs for all of the various lawsuits they're defending, covering misdeeds from the financial crisis to the Libor scandal, the Wall Street Journal guesstimates.

That may be too conservative.

The big six U.S. banks alone have already agreed to cough up $62.6 billion in settlements, according to research firm SNL Financial. Bank of America is the dubious leader of this group, having paid $41.6 billion in settlements all by its lonesome in just the past three years. Wells Fargo is a distant second, at $8.3 billion, and JPMorgan Chase is a close third at $7.8 billion. The rest of the Big Six include Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.

The bulk of these lawsuits involved the banks selling crummy mortgages to investors, and there could be another $25 billion in legal costs on that front alone, the WSJ suggests, citing research by Compass Point Research & Trading. That gets you close to the WSJ's $100 billion in a hurry.

This doesn't even begin to cover the potential legal liabilities for manipulation of the short-term interest rate known as Libor. As the WSJ points out, Macquarie Research has estimated the total cost to banks could be $176 billion. The low-end estimate for potential Libor liability is almost nothing, about $8 billion. But when it comes to these sorts of things, it's usually best to err on the side of caution, particularly if you are a bank trying to set enough money aside to cover your bills.

And new scandals come to light just about every day in the banking sector, in what must feel like an endless nirvana for plaintiffs' lawyers. For example, if you don't have standing to sue banks over manipulating Libor -- and if you have ever borrowed money or traded derivatives, you may well have a shot -- maybe you'll have better luck with the unfolding gold-price manipulation scandal.

Of course, this does not begin to account for the non-stop hellfire of regulatory probes and settlements afflicting the banks, particularly the biggest ones. JPMorgan Chase, for example, is under investigation for its disastrous London Whale trades, Libor manipulation, electricity-market manipulation, poor money-laundering controls, mortgage foreclosure practices, and more. The New York Times reported a fresh regulatory headache on JPMorgan's list this morning: It's under investigation for maybe not giving authorities a timely heads-up about Ponzi-schemer Bernie Madoff.

But don't feel too bad for these banks. Though all of the scandals and legal costs may be a bit of a worry for investors, banks were still the best-performing sector in the market last year -- led by Bank of America, despite its legal woes. JPMorgan has managed to bravely overcome its many legal and regulatory challenges to post record profits. The banking sector in total turned a $141 billion profit in 2012, the second-highest on record, according to FDIC data. The big banks recently got the all-clear from the Fed to give more money back to shareholders, suggesting they've got more than enough to pay their legal bills.

All in all, being too big to fail, or prosecute, still seems like a pretty good deal.

Also on The Huffington Post

Close
Bankers Who Want To Break Up Big Banks
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

Break up big banks

Are Banks Bluffing About the Danger of Banking Regulation?

Global Agenda: Too big for trial

The White House's dangerous stance on 'too big to fail'

Here's How To Deal With Our "Too Big To Fail" Banks

'Too big to fail' fears rise as banks bulk up; lessons from past forgotten?

Why Congress Won't Act on 'Too Big to Fail'

Banks Still Too-Big-To-Fail: Six Things The Fed Must Do