You have no idea just how bonkers high-frequency trading is making the stock market until you actually see it in action.
A terrifying new video by the research firm Nanex offers just such an opportunity: It shows one half-second of trading in just one stock, boring old Johnson & Johnson, on May 2. The video slows down the trades so that the milliseconds -- thousandths of a second -- tick slowly by, and so that human eyes can comprehend what's happening.
What you see is trading gone haywire, hopelessly beyond the control of any regulators that might want to make sure all of these trades are legitimate. This flood of trading confuses even other machines, creating mismatches in orders that high-speed traders can exploit, millisecond by millisecond.
"These guys are not stealing dollars, they're stealing pennies," says Nanex founder Eric Hunsader, who presented the video at a recent Wired conference. "It's like paper cuts instead of first-degree murder."
Nanex is the same firm that produced a viral animated GIF last year showing the rise of high-frequency trading robots over the years. This video offers the first clear look at what those robots are doing every day, all day, now that they control more than half of all market volume.
Inside of the one half-second of trading represented by the video, more than 1,200 orders and 215 actual trades occur, Hunsader says. (The colored boxes in the video represent exchanges, and the dots that go flying represent individual orders.)
And this sort of thing happens 100,000 times a day, Hunsader estimates.
Defenders of high-speed trading say it provides "liquidity" to the market, making orders flow more smoothly, which lowers trading costs and makes us all richer. That's debatable, particularly when the research that supposedly backs up these arguments is financed by high-frequency trading firms. And that liquidity can occasionally disappear all at once when things go wrong, leading to scary market glitches like the "Twitter Flash Crash" of earlier this month and the big Flash Crash that happened three years ago.
Regulators are desperately trying to keep up. The European Union last year approved a new rule mandating that all trades must exist for at least a half-second, in order to try to minimize the kind of quote-stuffing that frightens and confuses markets. It turns out that half-second is an eternity.
The Securities and Exchange Commission last year employed a high-frequency trading firm, Tradeworx, to help it keep an eye on high-speed trading, in a project it calls "Midas." So far the only ones turning things into gold are the high-speed traders.
Also on HuffPost:
S&P Lawsuit Emails Reveal Analysts Saw Problems With Quality of Ratings
According to a federal lawsuit, a 2007 email allegedly written by an investment banker to an S&P analyst included <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/05/sp-lawsuit-emails_n_2623933.html?utm_hp_ref=business" target="_hplink">this statement</a>. Other emails sent by S&P suggested that analysts were very much aware of how little quality control was valued at S&P.
The "Fabulous Fab" Email
Goldman Sachs Vice President Fabrice Tourre sent <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/fabrice-tourre-fabulous-fab-2010-4" target="_hplink">internal emails</a> suggesting he had <a href="http://articles.marketwatch.com/2010-04-16/industries/30812338_1_fabulous-fab-tourre-exotic-trades" target="_hplink" target="_hplink">major doubts </a>about the collateralized debt obligations he sold to investors in early 2007.
S&P Employee and Collaterized Debt Obligations
In an internal email sent in December of 2006, an S&P employee indicated that he knew <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/04/u-s-and-states-prepare-to-sue-s-p-over-mortgage-ratings/" target="_hplink">how bad collateralized debt obligations</a> were before the heart of the financial crisis, The New York Times reported.
Goldman Sachs Traders On Subprime Mortgages
By 2006, Goldman Sachs traders were internally describing subprime home mortgages in <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/10/investigation-goldman-sachs_n_1765368.html" target="_hplink">a very negative light</a>.
Former Merrill Lynch Analyst Henry Blodget
Blodget <a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1938544,00.html#ixzz2K3H3Vm5H" target="_hplink">encouraged investors </a>to buy stocks that he privately wrote in emails were not good investments, to say the least, Time reported in 2009.
Barclays Traders and Libor
In private emails, Barclays traders wrote incriminating statements indicating <a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/27/1062301/libor-manipulation-done-for-you-big-boy/" target="_hplink">the manipulation of libor</a>, the Financial Times reported.
JPMorgan Chase <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/18/jpmorgan-idUSN1829544020110218?WT.tsrc=Social Media&WT.z_smid=twtr-reuters_ com&WT.z_smid_dest=Twitter" target="_hplink" target="_hplink"> claimed</a> in a lawsuit that Lehman deceived JPMorgan with bad assets, which Lehman employees allegedly referred to internally as "goat poo."
Merrill Lynch Analysts
Back in the early 2000s, then-Attorney General Eliot Spitzer used internal emails from Merrill Lynch to prove that the bank continually promoted stocks -- <a href="http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/finance/2002-04-15-spitzer-email-evidence.htm" target="_hplink">such as Internet company GoTo.com</a> -- that it did not really believe in.
Morgan Stanley Bankers
Morgan Stanley bankers openly joked about <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/23/morgan-stanley-cdo-emails_n_2535784.html">a toxic investment</a> they were creating in 2007 and debated naming it "Shitbag," "Nuclear Holocaust," "Subprime Meltdown" and "Mike Tyson's Punchout," according to recently unearthed emails. The bankers later agreed upon the name "Stack."