Ilya Shapiro, Cato Institute Fellow: Voting Rights Act Ruling Was 'Victory For Democracy'

Posted: Updated:
Print

With the Supreme Court's dramatic new decision invalidating an important provision of the Voting Rights Act, attention is already turning to how Congress -- and the rest of America -- will respond.

On HuffPost Live Tuesday, guests debated what the decision will mean going forward. Ilya Shapiro, a fellow at the Cato Institute and the editor of the Cato Supreme Court Review, said he feels the controversial decision "restores constitutional order" and is a sign that "we're becoming a normal country." Meanwhile, Myrna Perez, a senior fellow at New York University's Brennan Center for Justice, argued that racial discrimination in voting still exists and that it's time that we talk to Congress and "come up with a bipartisan solution that will survive constitutional muster."

Watch the video at HuffPost Live

Around the Web

Supreme Court Strikes Blow to Voting Rights Act: What's Next ... - PBS

What will Congress do now about the Voting Rights Act?

What the Supreme Court's Voting Rights Act decision means for ...

Voting Rights Act ruling: Here's what you need to know

After Voting Rights Act weakened, Congress considers its next step ...

A look at 48 years of the Voting Rights Act - Yahoo! News

Daily Kos: End times, the Voting Rights Act and Republican 'humor'

Supreme Court Strikes Blow to Voting Rights Act: What's Next?

Voting Rights Act: What does ruling mean for Alaskans?

What the Supreme Court Doesn't Understand About the Voting Rights Act

Congress unlikely to act on voting rights ruling

Will Congress Right the Voting Rights Wrongs?