(Corrects to say University of Southern California Gould School of Law in the sixth paragraph.)
By Patrick Temple-West
WASHINGTON, July 24 (Reuters) - The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is pursuing tax enforcement cases against companies over the issue of "stateless income," a senior agency official said on Wednesday in a reference to corporate profits that are not taxed by any country.
Erik Corwin, an IRS deputy chief counsel, said there were international tax disputes with companies, "most involving consequences of complex restructurings designed either to create stateless income or to affect a tax efficient repatriation."
"So those are a family of cases that are in the pipeline and being looked at," he told tax lawyers in a speech in Washington.
Asked by reporters later to elaborate on any litigation, Corwin declined to comment. But tax lawyers said the references to stateless income and profits held offshore could signal a new enforcement approach by the IRS.
"I have not heard the IRS use the term before," Edward Kleinbard, who coined the "stateless income" phrase in a 2007 research paper, said in a telephone interview.
He is a former chief of staff to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation and now a professor at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law.
Concern over stateless income was raised in May when the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released a report that found Apple Inc avoided $9 billion in U.S. taxes in 2012 using a strategy involving three offshore units with no discernible tax home or "residence."
Companies that avoid taxes say they are doing nothing illegal, but are taking advantage of breaks offered by governments to create jobs and business.
The repatriation of profits has been a top concern for U.S. companies, which collectively have more than $1.5 trillion sitting offshore. Most say they keep the money there to avoid the taxes they would face by bringing it home.
The IRS official's comments came days after the G20, a group of leading world economies made up of 19 countries plus the European Union, voiced support for a fundamental reassessment of the rules on taxing multinational corporations.
On July 19, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, which advises the G20 on tax and economic policy, released an action plan that said existing national tax enforcement regimes do not work. The plan took aim at loopholes used by companies such as Apple and Google Inc to avoid billions of dollars in taxes.
"We must address the persistent issue of 'stateless income,' which undermines confidence in our tax system at all levels," U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said in a statement on July 19 following the OECD report. (Reporting by Patrick Temple-West; Editing by Howard Goller and Andre Grenon)
Also on HuffPost:
Domestic Manufacturing Activities
Big fan: Starbucks Starbucks is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/15/obama-corporate-tax-reform_n_2680880.html" target="_blank">among the companies</a> that have successfully lobbied to qualify for a tax break that rewards U.S. manufacturing. As a result, activities like roasting coffee beans count as domestic manufacturing and are eligible for tax breaks.
Excess Stock Options
Big fan: Facebook About 280 Fortune 500 companies have taken home a total of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/24/mcdonalds-starbucks-apple-tax-break_n_3147875.html?utm_hp_ref=business" target="_blank">$27.3 billion over the past three years</a> thanks to a tax break that allows corporations to treat executive stock awards like cash compensation -- meaning the money can be written off like a business expense -- according to a recent report from the Citizens for Tax Justice. Critics argue that this defies "common sense," given stock options aren't a cost to the company like cash compensation is. Facebook <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-02-15/facebook-gets-a-multi-billion-dollar-tax-break" target="_blank">used this single loophole</a> to wipe out its entire tax liability last year.
Big fan: Duke Energy Accelerated depreciation <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/15/corporate-tax-breaks-cost_n_3087972.html" target="_blank">accounted for $76 billion</a> in revenue loss in 2011, the most of any corporate tax break, according to the Government Accountability Office. The tax break allows businesses to write off the costs of ostensibly deteriorating machinery before the equipment even wears out. A Citizens for Tax Justice study <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/10/us-usa-tax-corporations-idUSBRE8380TJ20120410" target="_blank">found that Duke Energy</a> managed to reduce its tax liability largely by using this tax break. Duke called the study misleading.
Deferral On Overseas Profits
Big fan: Apple Fortune 500 companies, including Apple, have <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/14/fortune-500-overseas-profits_n_2301223.html" target="_blank">more than $1.6 trillion in profits</a> parked offshore, according to multiple recent studies. By keeping that money overseas, companies are able to avoid paying U.S. taxes on the profits.
Exclusion Of Interest On State And Municipal Bonds
Big fan: Goldman Sachs When companies invest in state and municipal bonds, they are <a href="http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2011/02/09/10-Big-Corporate-Tax-Breaks.aspx#page2" target="_blank">exempt from taxes</a> on the interest they earn from those bonds. This is one corporate tax break that individuals can take advantage of as well, though it largely benefits the wealthy. As a result of the loophole, the <a href="http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2011/02/09/10-Big-Corporate-Tax-Breaks.aspx#page2" target="_blank">government has lost $58 billion</a> over the past five years, according to the Fiscal Times. Companies including Goldman Sachs have benefitted from the exemption by using the tax exempt bonds to build new offices, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/05/business/qualified-private-activity-bonds-come-under-new-scrutiny.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">according to The New York Times</a>.
Fossil Fuel Subsidies
Big fan: Continental Resources Oil and gas companies currently benefit from tax breaks that they say encourage innovation by subsidizing hunts for oil and gas that may not turn out to be fruitful. The result: Continental Resources <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/harold-hamm-tax-break_n_1884327.html" target="_blank">paid an effective tax rate of 2.2 percent</a> over the past 5 years. Chevron and Exxon Mobil paid tax rates at 4 percent and 2 percent, respectively. Pictured is Harold Hamm, Continental Resources' CEO.
Big fan: Google Those famous free lunches in the Google cafeteria are <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324050304578408461566171752.html" target="_hplink">currently offered tax-free</a>, according to the Wall Street Journal. Right now, the lunches aren't treated as taxable compensation, so employees are benefitting from the free food, but don't have to pay taxes on it.
Corporate Jet Owners Tax Break
Big fan: The aviation industry, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/20/obama-corporate-jet_n_2912781.html" target="_hplink">specifically companies like Cessna</a>, Beechcraft and Learjet This tax break, which allows companies to deduct the cost of a corporate jet from their tax bill like they would any other business expense, got its moment in the spotlight when President Barack Obama <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/20/obama-corporate-jet_n_2912781.html" target="_blank">highlighted it as an unfair perk for the rich</a>. The president's 2011 budget<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/19/obama-corporate-jet-taxes_n_970384.html" target="_blank"> pushed for an increase in the per-flight fee</a> for private jets from $60 to $100, yet the break remains in effect today. Companies that make jets, like Cessna, Beechcraft and Learjet, benefit from the subsidy as it supports the aviation industry, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/20/obama-corporate-jet_n_2912781.html" target="_blank">according to proponents of the subsidy</a>.