NEW YORK — Abercrombie & Fitch is the latest retailer to catch a case of the teenage blues.

A&F's shares plummeted Thursday after the store chain reported a 33 percent drop in second-quarter profit and warned that business would get even worse in the current quarter, which includes the final stretch of the back-to-school selling period. The teen retailer's results missed analysts' estimates and its third-quarter earnings forecast came in well below Wall Street expectations.

The stock tumbled nearly 18 percent, or $8.27, to close at $38.53.

Teen retailers have struggled during their most recent quarter. Their customer base can be fickle, with constantly changing tastes in fashion and promotions causing shopper loyalty to wane.

In addition, many teens' clothing purchases are tied closely to how much their parents are willing to spend – and lately that's not much. Shoppers have been increasingly cautious as they continue to deal with uncertain economic conditions and absorb a 2 percentage-point increase in the Social Security payroll tax. A shift in spending toward cars and home improvement is also leaving little left to spend on clothing and other purchases.

Moreover, teens are also facing scarce opportunities for summer jobs or part-time work during the school year. That leaves them short of the extra pocket money to finance a new pair of jeans or leggings.

"The second quarter proved to be more difficult than expected due to weaker traffic particularly in July, and continued softness in the female business," Mike Jeffries, chairman and CEO of A&F, said during a conference call with investors. "The reasons for the weak traffic are not entirely clear. Our best theory is that while consumers in general are feeling better about the overall economic environment, it is less the case for the young consumer."

Executives also note that that youth spending appears to be going toward other categories like tablets and consumer electronics. As a result, the company has been paring back winter holiday orders over the last few weeks, says Jonathan Ramsden, A&F's chief financial officer.

A day earlier, competitor American Eagle Outfitters Inc. posted weak second-quarter results on a similar drop in traffic and difficulty in its women's business. The retailer also gave a third-quarter profit forecast short of analysts' expectations.

Another teen standby, Aeropostale Inc., on Thursday posted a loss for its latest quarter due to poor sales. It issued a weak outlook and increased the number of stores that it plans to close. The company had already warned investors to expect a bigger loss because it had to mark down more clothing because of weak demand.

Aeropostale's shares fell nearly 4 percent, or 44 cents, to close at $10.98 and hit a 52-week low of $10.88 during the session.

For the period ended Aug. 3, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. earned $11.4 million, or 14 cents per share. That's down from $17.1 million, or 20 cents per share, a year earlier. Removing 2 cents per share in charges tied to its profit-improvement plans, earnings were 16 cents per share.

Analysts surveyed by FactSet expected much higher earnings of 28 cents per share.

Revenue dipped 1 percent to $945.7 million from $951.4 million. U.S. sales fell 8 percent including the direct-to-consumer business. Wall Street had estimated revenue of $996.7 million.

While the U.S. performance was soft, results were better elsewhere. International sales including direct-to-consumer climbed 15 percent, and direct-to-consumer sales for the whole company – including shipping and handling – increased 21 percent.

Revenue at stores open at least a year, a key indicator of a retailer's health, declined 10 percent on softness worldwide. Abercrombie & Fitch said that the figure includes direct-to-consumer sales. This metric excludes results from stores recently opened or closed.

In the U.S., revenue at stores open at least a year fell 11 percent. The figure dropped 7 percent overseas. The company said that the weakest results came in July.

Among its brands, the weakest results came from Hollister Co., which reported a 13 percent sales decline. The chain's namesake brand posted a 6 percent drop, while comparable sales for Abercrombie kids fell 3 percent. The performances include Internet and catalog sales.

Going forward, Abercrombie & Fitch anticipates third-quarter earnings of 40 cents to 45 cents per share. Analysts had predicted $1.07 per share. The New Albany, Ohio, company said it is not giving predictions past the third quarter because it is unclear on projections due to recent traffic trends.

Abercrombie & Fitch had 1,057 stores at quarter's end.

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • 7. Lehman Brothers

    Lehman Brothers was one of Wall Street’s most well-known and respected financial firms. But the housing crisis that roiled global financial markets in 2007 and 2008 led to Lehman’s eventual bankruptcy after sustaining massive losses from its mortgage investment operations. In September 2008, British bank Barclays PLC (NYSE: BCS) purchased Lehman’s U.S. investment banking business as well as its Manhattan property — which by that point was worth several times its core U.S. businesses. Other parts of the company were sold off as well. Japanese firm Nomura Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NMR) bought Lehman’s international businesses, and a group of senior company employees bought its asset management unit, Neuberger Berman. <a href="http://247wallst.com/2013/07/03/iconic-brands-that-just-vanished" target="_hplink">Read more at 24/7 Wall St.</a>

  • 6. Cingular Wireless

    Cingular Wireless was founded in 2000 as a joint venture between 60% owner SBC and 40% owner BellSouth. The brand quickly became a household name in the United States. By 2007, Cingular’s brand was worth over $9.2 billion, according to Brand Z. However, several mergers involving Cingular’s parent companies complicated its brand identity. In 2005, SBC bought AT&T, and then adopted the company’s name. The new AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) then merged with BellSouth, and incorporated the orange hue of Cingular into its ads. <a href="http://247wallst.com/2013/07/03/iconic-brands-that-just-vanished" target="_hplink">Read more at 24/7 Wall St.</a>

  • 5. Wachovia

    In 2006, Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia was the 54th most valuable brand in the world, according to BrandZ, and as recently as 2008, it was 67th overall. At the time, the bank was the fourth largest in the U.S. based on assets. But that year, the financial and housing crises left the bank in a serious bind. Because of its overaggressive lending practices, its earnings plummeted. On January 1, 2009, Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC) completed the acquisition of Wachovia for $15.1 billion. <a href="http://247wallst.com/2013/07/03/iconic-brands-that-just-vanished" target="_hplink">Read more at 24/7 Wall St.</a>

  • 4. Saab

    European car manufacturer Saab was a popular niche automaker for years. The brand’s 900 series had great success in the United States during the 1980s and 1990s, but the brand’s appeal began to seriously decline by the 2000s. General Motors Co. (NYSE: GM), which already owned half of the company, purchased the remainder of Saab in 2000, only to sell the carmaker in 2010 after its own 2009 bankruptcy. In 2008, Saab sold 21,368 units in the United States, according to data provided by Edmunds.com. The following year, it sold 8,600, units and has declined ever since. In 2011, Saab told its suppliers and workers that it could no longer afford to pay them. The company filed for bankruptcy that same year. In 2007, according to Corebrand, Saab was the 65th most valuable brand in the world. It now appears unlikely that another Saab will ever be sold in the United States. <a href="http://247wallst.com/2013/07/03/iconic-brands-that-just-vanished" target="_hplink">Read more at 24/7 Wall St.</a>

  • 3. Sony Ericsson

    Sony Ericsson — a joint venture between Japanese conglomerate Sony Corp. (NYSE: SNE) and Swedish telecom company Ericsson (NASDAQ: ERIC) — was founded in 2001. The new venture quickly became one of the world’s best-known brands, ranking 36th out of 100 measured by Interbrand for that same year — above international mainstays such as Heinz and Louis Vuitton. Among its notable products were the T68i, the first widely available color phone, and the K750i, which included a cutting-edge camera and music storage capability. However, with the introduction of smartphones, Sony-Ericsson became an afterthought in a market dominated by Apple and Android phones. In October 2011, Sony bought out Ericsson’s share in the venture. <a href="http://247wallst.com/2013/07/03/iconic-brands-that-just-vanished" target="_hplink">Read more at 24/7 Wall St.</a>

  • 2. Washington Mutual

    Washington Mutual, based out of Seattle, grew precipitously after Kerry Killinger was named chief executive officer in 1990. Under his leadership, the bank began acquiring smaller financial institutions for much of the next two decades. Later on, the company also was focused heavily on its brand and marketed itself as WaMu with popular ad campaigns. The firm’s marketing campaigns often mocked other banks as elitist and frugal. However, it was Washington Mutual that, in the financial crisis, became America’s largest bank failure ever. The company was bought up by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), which may very well have been one of the financial institutions WaMu once made fun of. <a href="http://247wallst.com/2013/07/03/iconic-brands-that-just-vanished" target="_hplink">Read more at 24/7 Wall St.</a>

  • 1. Compaq

    At the turn of the 21st century, Compaq accounted for roughly 20% of U.S. PC sales. In 2001, Interbrand rated Compaq’s brand as the 24th most valuable in the world. In September of that year, competitor Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ) announced that it would purchase the company for $25 billion in stock. Both companies’ sales had been dropping, and the merger was their attempt to compete with International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE: IBM). However, management issues and the shrinking PC market led to the continuing decline of both brands. Last May, HP announced it would be phasing out the HP Compaq label, and that the Compaq brand would be used only for select low-end products. Currently, attempts to buy a Compaq device on the Compaq website result in a redirect to the HP website. There does not appear to be a place on the HP website to buy Compaq-branded merchandise. According to HP sales representatives, while retailers like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) still may offer older Compaq laptops and PCs, HP no longer sells Compaq computers. <a href="http://247wallst.com/2013/07/03/iconic-brands-that-just-vanished" target="_hplink">Read more at 24/7 Wall St.</a>