MEDIA

Obama Got Ranted At By Ed Schultz, Was Enraged By Bad NYT Coverage: New Book

09/18/2013 09:32 am 09:32:26 | Updated Sep 19, 2013

President Obama had to listen to a rant from Ed Schultz about his leadership and was constantly complaining about the New York Times' critical editorials about him, a new book says.

Richard Wolffe's "The Message" details some of the problems the White House had with Obama's liberal supporters in the media during the 2012 campaign. On his Monday radio show, Schultz read a summary of the book in the Washington Post, which said that Obama had to "put up with a tirade" from him in a meeting with other pundits and reporters, including HuffPost's Arianna Huffington.

The excerpt in question reads:

Ed Schultz sat listening to others opine before ripping into an impassioned plea for the president to stand up and fight. The forty-fourth president of the United States listened calmly and nodded his head, surprising his aides with a meek appearance that successfully masked how little patience he had for such criticism.

"I don't know, maybe they had thin skins over there at the White House," Schultz crowed.

Wolffe also writes about Obama's growing impatience with the Times, which ran a string of negative editorials about him:

After each negative editorial, the president would summon his communications team to discuss the critical coverage. It was a deeply unpleasant experience for his staff, who bore the brunt of the presidential outbursts.

Finally, Obama tried to call Andy Rosenthal, who edited the editorial page. The problem? Nobody had the number:

“[Communications staffer Anita Decker], just call the main line,” said the president.

“Anita, you can’t do that,” Pfeiffer interjected. “If you call the main line, they are going to announce on the PA system that the president is on the phone for Andy Rosenthal. We can’t do that.”

So much for the position of strength. In time, they found the number and the president spoke at length to Rosenthal.

Also on HuffPost:

Barack Obama Style Evolution
Suggest a correction
2,633 Comments

CONVERSATIONS