NEW YORK -- What lessons should Americans learn from the continuing disaster surrounding the crippled Fukushima nuclear facility in Japan? A panel of experts, diplomats and activists came together Tuesday to argue their case for an end to the controversial energy source, or improved safety measures at the very least, and to express their concerns about potential causes for a similar meltdown stateside.
The shuttered Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant has been an ongoing source of radioactive leaks since March 2011, when the region was hit with an 8.9-magnitude earthquake and a resultant tsunami. Nuclear regulators formally announced widespread leakage this August, and officials have sharply criticized the apparent months-long delay in response. TEPCO, the energy company that operates the reactor, has asked for international assistance to control the spills after announcing plans to build a subterranean ice wall to contain contaminated water. Meanwhile, the leaks persist.
Tuesday's event, titled "The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Ongoing Lessons," was organized by the Samuel Lawrence Foundation, an anti-nuclear nonprofit based in California. Speakers included former Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan, activist Ralph Nader and Gregory Jaczko, the former head of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Kan, who was in office during the disaster, had harsh words for the nuclear technology he once supported.
"My position before March 11 was that as long as we make sure that it's safely operated, nuclear power plants can be operated and should be operated," he said through an interpreter. "However, after experiencing the disaster of March 11, I changed my thinking 180 degrees completely. We do have accidents ... and sometimes hundreds of people die in an accident. But there's no other accident that would affect 50 million people -- maybe a war -- but there's no other accident so tragic."
Kan went on to detail the Japanese response to the tsunami and meltdown, and the government's plan to shut down other nuclear facilities. He praised a similar effort in Germany and the revolutionary steps that country has taken toward alternative energy independence.
"If humanity really worked together, we could generate all of our energy through renewable energy. I firmly believe that," Kan said.
There are currently 65 operational nuclear plants in the U.S., which produce about 20 percent of all power generated in the country. However, only 37 percent of Americans think the U.S. should put more emphasis on the energy source.
Jaczko, who was NRC chairman at the time of the meltdown, criticized the commission's response to the crisis. He said the events in Japan were largely cast as something "that could never happen here," and that both the industry and regulators pressed on without re-evaluating U.S. nuclear safety standards.
"It is unthinkable to me that, at that time, there was such a pressure to move forward, and there was almost no hesitation on the part of the nuclear industry to say, 'Let's take a pause ... let's make our plant safer,'" he said.
"We should be thinking of this next generation of plants," Jaczko said. "Why would we not challenge ourselves to think about nuclear power in a way that doesn't present these kinds of challenges, that doesn't present challenges for severe accidents? Why is it that we continue to move forward with a technology that has all of these weaknesses?"
Nader, an ardent anti-nuclear activist, went further, urging those in attendance to rally against New York's controversial Indian Point nuclear facility, which lies just 35 miles north of New York City. He called for the immediate shut down of the reactor, and said the state should shift to another temporary energy source, "even fossil fuel."
That message was clearly summed up in the closing statement of Kan's speech:
"There is only one way to eliminate accidents," he said, "which is to get rid of all nuclear power plants."
You can watch a cached video of the event above, which will be available for at least 30 days.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.