Huffpost New York

Stop-And-Frisk Rulings Won't Be Tossed By Appeals Court

Posted: Updated:
STOP AND FRISK
FILE - In this June 17, 2012, file photo, the Rev. Al Sharpton, center, walks with demonstrators during a silent march to end New York's "stop-and-frisk" program. On Aug. 12, 2013, a federal judge sitting in New York said the department made thousands of racially discriminatory street stops and appointed a monitor to direct changes. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File) | ASSOCIATED PRESS
Print

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court has refused to toss out court rulings finding that New York City carried out its police stop-and-frisk policy in a discriminatory manner.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday. Last month, an appeals panel had suspended the effects of a lower-court ruling.

The city had argued that the panel's decision to remove federal Judge Shira Scheindlin (SHEER'-uh SHIND'-lihn) meant it should also nullify her rulings.

Scheindlin ruled in August that police officers sometimes carried out stop-and-frisk unconstitutionally by discriminating against minorities.

The court's action appears to spoil the city's bid to get Scheindlin's rulings tossed before a new mayor sympathetic to her viewpoint takes office in January.

Around the Web

ACLU Questions Baltimore Police's 'Stop & Frisk' Method

De Blasio would keep stop and frisk, and crime would go up; why are those good ...

NY Post's Stop-and-Frisk Scare

Stop-And-Frisk Arrests Yield Convictions Only Fifty Percent Of The Time ...