It has been well documented that over the past four decades, increases in the use of fertility treatments have coincided with a significant boom in the rate of multiple births in the United States.
Now, a new report has taken a closer look at the trend, finding that in 2011 more than one-third of twin births, and more than three-quarters of all triplet and higher-order births (multiples of three or more) resulted from reproductive treatments.
The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday, says by 2011, the incidence of triplet or higher-order births decreased by 29 percent from its peak in 1998 -- a trend researchers attributed, in part, to changes in medical guidelines. In 1998, the Society for Reproductive developed for the first time guidelines aimed at reducing multiple births resulting from in vitro fertilization by encouraging limits on the embryos transferred into the woman. Twins and other multiples have a greater risk of being born at a low birth weight, and have been linked to significantly higher health care costs.
"We don't want to overstate it, and say that we've solved the problem," said Dr. Kathy Hoeger, director of the Strong Fertility Center at the University of Rochester, N.Y., who called the findings "positive" -- particularly regarding IVF. "The policy changes at the national level are really helping to guide practice and provide patients with information." Hoeger did not work on the new study.
But as health policymakers have focused their efforts on in vitro, other fertility treatments have overtaken IVF as major sources of multiple births resulting from medical interventions.
"One thing we didn't quite expect is that among the culprits, IVF -- which we always tend to intuitively point fingers at -- remains an actor, but it's not the main offender," the study's senior author, Dr. Eli Adashi, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Brown University, told The Huffington Post. "Various non-IVF approaches seem to lead the pack, and account for more and more of the multiples that we see."
Women hoping to conceive are often prescribed ovulation-inducing medications, or undergo insemination, having sperm placed directly into their uterus. And unlike IVF, where doctors can control the number of embryos transferred into the woman, there are fewer ways to control, for example, whether an ovulatory drug such as Clomid will result in multiple births. Often, women are prescribed fertility treatments by doctors who do not necessarily specialize in reproductive endocrinology, meaning patients may be unaware of the risks, Adashi said.
"There are about 50,000 providers of women's health services in the U.S., all of whom are in a position to offer non-IVF technologies," he explained. "In the long run, it takes education, education, education for new insights to diffuse to the entire medical community."
The new report did not find a marked decrease in the rate of twin births: It estimated that the proportion of twin births resulting from medically assisted conceptions rose from 27 percent in 1998 to 36 percent in 2011.
Marilynn Marchione reported for the Associated Press earlier this week, 46 percent of IVF babies are multiples, mostly twins. Groups like the American Society for Reproductive Medicine are attempting to target those rates, updating guidelines so that women under 35 with reasonable odds of success are offered single embryo transfer, and no more than two embryos at one time.
And the need for fertility treatment is high. Estimates suggest that roughly 6 percent of married women between the ages of 15 and 44 in the U.S. are unable to get pregnant after one year of regular, unprotected sex, which is the general definition used for infertility. Around 11 percent of all women age 15 to 44 have difficulty getting pregnant or carrying a pregnancy to term.
"We have a ways to go," said Hoeger, speaking of limiting the risk of multiples. But "in the big picture," she added, "fertility treatments are such a necessary and welcome part of assisting people [who hope to conceive]."
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.