WASHINGTON -- Vermont Democratic Rep. Peter Welch is offering a simple way for Congress to avoid damaging standoffs over the nation's debt ceiling: agree to pay the bills before running them up.
Perhaps that seems like an expectation a government would already be meeting, but the way the United States' elected representatives authorize spending now amounts to ordering up a nice meal, then holding a pitched battle over whether or not the check should be paid.
That's because Congress sets the borrowing cap independently of the budget or the appropriations bills that Congress passes to pay for things.
Congress legislates the programs it wants to fund, and orders up the spending. Only later does it addresses the debt limit, which is the maximum amount the Treasury Department is allowed to borrow to pay those bills.
Since the United States spends more than it takes in under both Republican and Democratic budgets, it will need to keep raising the debt limit or be forced to default on at least some obligations. Under the spending plan of the recent bipartisan budget deal, the Treasury Department estimates the country will hit its current debt cap of $17.2 trillion in early March.
Yet some Republicans, including ones who voted for the budget, such as Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.), are already suggesting they will refuse to raise the limit unless they get concessions.
The whole thing makes little sense to Welch.
"Have they learned nothing from the damage done with the previous two shutdown efforts?" he said, referring to the showdown in August, 2011, and the 16-day government shutdown in October.
The folks who are arguing that they're going to use the debt ceiling as leverage are the folks who just passed the budget that may require the debt ceiling to be raised to accommodate it," Welch said. "So there's a fair amount of Congressional hypocrisy here."
But Welch sees a possible way out of the standoffs in recent history: reinstitution of something called the Gephardt rule, named after a procedure hatched in 1979 by then-Rep. Dick Gephardt. Under it, rather than have a separate vote to authorize the debt hike, the ceiling is deemed to be raised when the House passes the budget resolution.
That way if lawmakers want to vote for spending, they are voting to pay for it at the same time.
"The Gephardt rule would require all of us in voting on a budget to acknowledge that the debt ceiling has to be adjusted up or down depending on the budget Congress passes," Welch said.
It's far from likely that anyone will take the Vermonter up on the idea anytime soon, though, since the debt ceiling has become Republicans' favorite piece of leverage and the GOP runs the House.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) declared his love for the leverage this week, in spite of the pounding his side took last fall.
"I hope all this is grandstanding politics by McConnell to appease his base," Welch said.
During the October standoff, Democrats and President Barack Obama refused to negotiate over keeping the bills paid, and largely won the debate with the public. Welch suggested that McConnell's threat may be more aimed at the tea party Republican challenging him in the Kentucky GOP primary.
"Maybe it's primary politics he's playing to resort again to a reckless and discredited tactic. It's hard to see any of us taking it seriously when it's been such a failure and it's done such damage," Welch said. "Using the debt ceiling as a gun to get your way on something else is just a bad tactic that should never be used by either party."
Republicans gradually phased out the Gephardt rule in the House when they won control, using it when it was convenient and ignoring it when they hoped to make Democrats take tough votes.
There has never been an equivalent of the Gephardt rule in the Senate, although there does not appear to be any parliamentary reason the upper chamber couldn't adopt one if there was sufficient support.
Michael McAuliff covers Congress and politics for The Huffington Post. Talk to him on Facebook.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.