Huffpost Parents

Jahi McMath Case Could Set Precedent For Parents' Rights

Posted: Updated:
Print Article
JAHI MCMATH
FILE - In this Dec. 20, 2013 file photo, Nailah Winkfield, mother of 13-year-old Jahi McMath, cries before a courtroom hearing regarding McMath, in Oakland, Calif. McMath remains on life support at Children's Hospital Oakland nearly a week after doctors declared her brain dead, following a supposedly routine tonsillectomy. Her family was expected to appear with hospital officials in court Monday, Dec. 23, 2013 to announce the name of the independent physician they have chosen to provide a secon | ASSOCIATED PRESS

The tragic case of Jahi McMath, the 13-year-old girl declared brain dead at Children’s Hospital Oakland following a tonsillectomy last month, may set a precedent regarding parents’ rights to determine whether or not their children should be kept on life supporting devices -- something bioethicists warn could complicate an already distressing issue.

“There are very significant issues that never been addressed in the Ninth Circuit in California before which is the right of a parent to make health care decisions relating to whether or not a ventilator gets removed from their child,” McMath’s family’s lawyer Christopher Dolan said.

On Sunday, McMath was transferred from the Oakland hospital to an undisclosed long-term care facility following a weeks-long court battle the family spearheaded to keep her on a ventilator, which the hospital sought to remove after declaring that her cardiac arrest and resulting brain death during recovery made her legally deceased under California law.

"Plaintiffs are Christians with firm religious beliefs that as long as the heart is beating, Jahi is alive," Dolan wrote in a court filing.

McMath’s mother, Nailah Winkfield, twice won court injunctions keeping the hospital from disconnecting her daughter from the machine, but a judge refused to require the hospital to fit her with the breathing and feeding tubes necessary to transfer her to a new facility. On Friday, the family and the hospital reached an agreement to have her transferred to new care if Winkfield assumed responsibility for any future complications.

Courts have unanimously agreed that McMath has died, as brain death is one of two legal deaths put forward by the Uniform Determination of Death Act.

Health policy and medical ethics expert Alexander Capron of the University of Southern California told the Los Angeles Times that allowing Winkfield to take her daughter’s body and forgo an autopsy was “strange,” noting that McMath’s case differs from similar legal disputes because she is brain dead, not in a persistent vegetative state as was Terri Schiavo, a woman whose brain damage sparked a heated legal battle in the 1990s.

Arthur Caplan, medical ethics director at New York University Langone Medical Center, worries that the family’s persistence that McMath remains alive further muddles an issue many have difficulty understanding.

“This hasn't helped at all," he said, noting that the case is nothing novel but because of its media attention may prompt other families to “ultimately say, 'I'd like to take this body home and wait for a miracle.' That would be a public policy of disrespect for dead bodies."

Also on HuffPost:

Missing Children
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

Jahi McMath is not alive: When life support sets a ... - Salon.com

Jahi McMath is not alive: When life support sets a ... - Roonte!

Clock ticks in Jahi McMath case; experts say court clash went too far ...

Jahi Family's Attorney Says Case Could Set Precedent For Parents' Rights

Clock ticks in Jahi McMath case; experts say court clash went too far