Huffpost Crime

New Trial Not Needed For Executed Boy George Stinney: Prosecutor

Posted: Updated:
FILE - This undated file photo provided by the South Carolina Department of Archives and History shows George Stinney Jr., the youngest person ever executed in South Carolina, in 1944. Supporters of Stinney plan to argue Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2014, that there wasn't enough evidence to find him guilty in 1944 of killing a 7-year-old and an 11-year-old girl. The black teen was found guilty of killing the white girls in a trial that lasted less than a day in the tiny Southern mill town of Alcolu, separ | ASSOCIATED PRESS

SUMTER, S.C. (AP) — A solicitor is arguing against a new trial for a 14-year-old boy executed nearly 70 years ago for killing two girls, saying prosecutors did a good job under the standards of the 1940s legal system.

Solicitor Ernest "Chip" Finney III said at a hearing Tuesday that the evidence in the case wasn't destroyed, but did disappear over time.

Supporters of the boy, George Stinney, are arguing there wasn't enough evidence in the first place to find the black teen guilty in 1944 of killing two white girls, ages 7 and 11. They say deputies in segregated Clarendon County did little investigation after deciding Stinney was the prime suspect. They believe police coerced a confession from him.

The confession and the transcript of the one-day trial have disappeared.

At 14, Stinney was the youngest person executed in the United States in the past 100 years.

Also on HuffPost:

Wrongfully Accused
Share this
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

SUMTER, SC: Prosecutor: New trial not needed for George Stinney ...

George Stinney, 14, executed in 1944; new trial sought after Alcolu ...

Prosecutor: New Trial Not Needed for Executed Boy - ABC News