An artist is only as good as her backstory.
At least, that's the logic behind the “eccentricity effect,” a phenomenon coined recently by a team of UK researchers, and one that may explain why some artists don’t quite do it for you and others can do no wrong.
The study, published this month in the European Journal of Social Psychology, features five damning phases of inquiry, all of which reinforce the hypothesis that viewers judge art based on their perception of the artist.
In the first phase, participants judged Vincent Van Gogh’s famous painting, Sunflowers. Half first heard the apocryphal story of the artist shearing off his left earlobe; the other half did not.
Sunflowers, by Vincent Van Gogh.
“As predicted, the art was evaluated more positively when Van Gogh's eccentric behavior was mentioned," wrote the authors of the study, psychology professors at the University of Limerick and the University of Southampton.
But, the authors added, participants may have been swayed by any number of preconceived notions about the famous Dutch master -- Van Gogh isn't just anybody, after all.
To remove that variable, they introduced a fictional artist for the next phase, one Jón Stefánsson of Iceland. Once again, half of a new set of participants were treated to a brief biography mentioning “very eccentric” behavior. And once again, this half judged the Icelander’s work, which consisted of three pieces designed specifically for the study, higher than their corollaries.
So, should aspiring artists start acting out as soon as they can? One of the researchers’ more baffling tales was of an “eccentric” painter who “carried roadside stones on his head” for his full adult life. How many stones to land a gallery show?
None, it turns out, unless they're toted with sincerity. Merely seeming strange isn’t enough, according to the study's findings. Authenticity -- or at least, perceived authenticity -- also counts.
In one of the final phases, participants read differing notes on a personality they were already familiar with, Lady Gaga. One edition included a critical opinion calling the singer’s “appearance and image...one of the most heavily marketed and strategically thought-through in contemporary pop-music.” The indictment was apparently game-changing: the group who read it rated Gaga’s artistry lower.
Might the variable have been the amount, rather than type, of information participants received? The researchers tested that possibility with a visual experiment.
In this module, one group saw a photograph of “Stefánsson” as a conventional-looking man in his late 20s. The other saw a Skrillexed version: a man of comparable age, but this time skinny, stubbly, and in all black, with “half-long hair combed over one side.”
This trick was repeated with two photographs of Gaga, one “ordinary," featuring a black dress, “regular” makeup and a ponytail, and the other more classically Gaga, replete with form-fitting suit, gloves and the kicker: “a large, shiny mask.”
Just an average day for the most "strategic" weirdo in the music industry, to borrow from the eccentricity study's characterization. This photograph, of Lady Gaga in a mustache and lingerie, was taken during a performance in Berlin last fall. Credit: AP.
But here again, the "eccentricity effect" triumphed. "As predicted," (you can almost hear the researchers yawning each time this phrase comes up in their report; that's how often it does) the groups treated to the offbeat portraits judged the subject's work more favorably than did their counterparts.
The link between mental illness and creativity is by now pop-science lore. But this new discovery -- the authors write that they know of no comparable study -- suggests an intriguing conclusion about the rest of us: We respond to cues. More viscerally, perhaps, than we do to art.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.