By Linda Rosenkrantz for Nameberry
At the beginning of the year, we like to flip back the calendar a hundred years to see what the baby name landscape looked like a century ago. 1914 was a year in which World War I was in full dudgeon, the year that President Wilson officially established Mother’s Day, Charlie Chaplin and Babe Ruth made their debuts, and saw the births of Dylan Thomas, Jonas Salk and Joe DiMaggio.
But the babyname universe was relatively calm, as we can see by looking at the stable top dozen girls’ names. Here, they are, in order of their 1914 popularity, and what their status is today:
In 1914, the New Testament Mary was in no danger of giving up her top spot, which she had held for hundreds of years and would continue to occupy for another 36. There were 45,000 little Marys born that year -- 5.6% of all girls --whereas though Mary is now at a still respectable Number 123, it was given to just over 2,500 girls in the last year counted.
Helen was a typical name of her day, quiet and reserved, associated with beauty in ancient times as ‘the face that launched a thousand ships.’ In 1914, Helen was put on birth certificates more than 23,000 times; today Helen ranks at Number 402, as many parents see Helena or Elena as more stylish alternatives.
Dorothy, currently near the bottom of the list at Number 922, was the third most popular name in the country in 1914, with close to 19,000 girls given that name, while currently a mere 275 Dorothys were registered. But with the name having reentered the Top 1000 in 2011, there might be signs of a revival
The classic, regal, saintly, Margaret has hardly ever been out of the Top 100, ranking now at Number 178. And when we looked recently at all her fabulous nicknames and variations, from Daisy to Maisie to Margot, we saw that she is still a name of infinite possibilities.
Ruth was the top Old Testament name of 1914, above such later favorites as Sarah, Rachel and Rebecca. Now, at Number 344, she’s at her lowest point ever, associated with the generation of Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg and Dr. Ruth. But some of these less popular OT names like Ruth, Esther, Miriam and Naomi are showing signs of stirring.
A multi-cultural favorite over the generations, Anna has just recently slipped off the Top 25, and is now at #35. Several younger actresses like Anna Paquin, Anna Gunn and Anna Kendrick have given it a shot of youthful energy.
Mildred is definitely the wallflower of the group, having been off the charts since 1984, though nickname Milly survives via Millicent. Sorry, but there’s just something about that dred second syllable.
Elizabeth is the sole survivor of the Top 10, without too much inconsistency over time: there were 11,000+ born in 1919, and 9,500+ in 2012 -- plus, of course, several of her nickname names that have popularity on their own.
The soft-spoken classic Frances was Number 9 in 1914 (coincidentally in the same place as was Frank), and now, though having dropped now to Number 764, seems to be on the brink of a revival, (she’s Number 79 on Nameberry), thanks partly to the influence of Pope Francis.
Though she hasn’t sunk as low as Dorothy or Frances, at Number 576 Marie sounds more dated than either of them, these days tending to be used mostly as a family namesake. It’s still hanging in as a middle though: Jessica Alba used it as such for daughter Honor, and Giada DeLaurentiis for her girl Jade.
The 1914 Number 11 name Evelyn is in the midst of a big comeback, now at Number 27, joining a growing clique of fashionable Ev-names -- Eve, Eva, Everett, Everest, Everly, Evie and Evangeline.
Alice, with her gentle Alice-in-Wonderland aura, has been climbing back up the ladder since Tina Fey chose it for her daughter in 2005, and is now at Number 127. Associated with an extraordinary number of noted women writers, Alice is one of the strongest and sweetest of the classic girls’ names.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.