The city council in Saginaw, Michigan, spent a few hours this week debating an ordinance that would have banned local businesses from firing or refusing to serve gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people because of their sexuality or gender identity.
Supporters argued that the measure would benefit the local economy by sending friendly signals to LGBT entrepreneurs and, more generally, to young people, who overwhelmingly support gay rights, according to polls.
But that argument didn’t go over well with Councilman Dan Fitzpatrick, a 40-year resident. He said it reminded him of something admittedly very bad that happened 80 years ago. "In about 1933, there was a real big youth movement in Germany called the party of National Socialists,” he said. “A lot of people said, 'You know, I don't like them. I don't know. I don't understand. But man they're good for business.'"
Fitzpatrick isn't the first rhetorician to compare gays with Nazis. Last month, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) said the vilification of people who oppose same-sex marriage is “exactly what we've seen throughout our history as going back to the days of the Nazi takeover in Europe."
Bryan Fischer, a radio host with the conservative advocacy group the American Family Association, has gone further.
According to Fischer’s imaginative reading of history, the Nazi party was actually made up of gay people. "Just as the homosexual stormtroopers for Hitler were to exterminate and eliminate the opposition and beat them into silence, that's what homosexual activists want to do today," Fischer said last year, in one of his many riffs on this theme.
Brandon Errer, a gay student at Saginaw Valley State University, said he and his friends in the city council meeting audience were "dumbfounded" by Fitzpatrick’s spin on the Nazi analogy.
"I've never been equated to a Nazi before," Errer said. "It was disheartening."
Earlier that night, Errer, 18, argued that passing the ordinance would encourage young people like himself to put down roots. By voting against the bill, the council risked “isolating a large generation that's ready to move into these cities," Errer said, according to a local report. "I hope that you think with your heart, but if you have to, please think with your wallet."
The council rejected the ordinance, 9-0.
Fitzpatrick didn’t respond to a call or email from The Huffington Post requesting comment. Another council member, Michael Balls, said at the meeting that he saw no need for the bill. “I don't think we have that much discrimination in Saginaw,” he said.
Char Inmi, a 58-year-old transgender woman who was at the meeting, said she has twice been fired for being transgender by businesses in other counties. She said she wasn't surprised there was not an extensive record of discrimination in Saginaw. "There's no record because it's not against the law. There is no discrimination, technically, legally, so there is no recourse," she said.
Saginaw isn’t a thriving town. Annie Boensch, the councilwoman who sponsored the ordinance, called it “one of those cities that's been hit the hardest by the loss of the manufacturing industry.”
“We need people,” Boensch said. “We need good people who are contributing to this city and if you look around and you look around who’s developing the city, building and renovating commercial properties, they're gay.”
One odd footnote to the episode is the fact that it was Fitzpatrick who brought the measure to a vote this week, even though the council had already voted against the same measure a few weeks earlier.
Fitzpatrick said he wanted the ordinance to be “permanently" killed this time around, according to the local news.
Boensch pointed out that no city council decisions are permanent, and noted that she didn't vote for it this time because she intends to file another version in the future. “I will absolutely bring this back," she said.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.