The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that Aereo was violating copyright law by streaming broadcast TV signals to subscribers without paying for them, striking a major blow to a startup that had threatened to upend the industry's lucrative business model.
The court ruled 6 to 3 against Aereo, reversing a federal appeals court decision and handing a victory to broadcasters who had sued the startup, claiming Aereo was stealing their programming.
Aereo is a 2-year-old company that uses tiny antennas to capture broadcast airwaves and stream those signals to users who pay about $8 a month for the service. It offers a handful of network TV offerings in about a dozen cities, and subscribers can watch and record the programming on their computers and mobile devices.
Broadcast signals owned by networks like Fox, ABC, NBC and CBS are transmitted free of charge to anyone with a television and an antenna. But cable companies like Comcast and Time Warner pay these networks billions of dollars in fees for the right to re-broadcast the network TV channels as part of paid cable packages.
Aereo argued it doesn't need to pay those fees because the broadcast signals -- which it captures and retransmits to its subscribers via the Internet -- are free.
Aereo's fate is unclear in the wake of the verdict. Many experts predicted the startup would be forced to shut down if it lost the case. But in a statement after the ruling, Aereo founder Chet Kanojia said that while he was "disappointed" in the outcome, "our work is not done."
"We will continue to fight for our consumers and fight to create innovative technologies that have a meaningful and positive impact on our world," Kanojia said.
Though Aereo streams network TV to subscribers via the cloud, the justices said their ruling should not affect other tech companies that provide cloud services.
One of the broadcasters, 21st Century Fox, said in a statement that the decision against Aereo "is a win for consumers" because it protects copyright law and ensures "real innovation” in the television industry.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan sided with the broadcasters. In their decision, the justices found there was "no critical difference" between Aereo's businesses model and that of a cable company, which is bound by law to pay retransmission fees to broadcasters.
Aereo argued it merely supplied subscribers with antennas, but the justices found Aereo "does not merely supply equipment" but also broadcasts programs publicly in violation of the Copyright Act.
"Aereo sells a service that allows subscribers to watch television programs, many of which are copyrighted, virtually as they are being broadcast," the opinion said.
In his opinion, Justice Breyer added that Aereo is providing a service that is "for all practical purposes a traditional cable system."
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. joined Antonin Scalia in their dissent.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Scalia said he agreed that "what Aereo is doing (or enabling to be done) to the networks’ copyrighted programming ought not to be allowed."
But Scalia said Aereo provides users with an antenna and may not be liable for copyright infringement because consumers -- and not Aereo -- choose which shows to broadcast.
"The point is that subscribers call all the shots," Scalia wrote.
Public Knowledge, a public interest group, called the Supreme Court's decision "very unfortunate for consumers" because Aereo "has provided an innovative service that brings consumers more choices, more control over their programming, and lower prices."
"We're concerned that the court's misreading of the law leaves consumers beholden to dominant entertainment and cable companies that constantly raise prices and gouge consumers," the group said in a statement.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.