People Are Hating On SCOTUSblog For The Wrong Reason

SCOTUSblog's Response To Haters Is The Best Thing Ever
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 25: Demonstrators rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby March 25, 2014 in Washington, DC. The court heard from lawyers on both sides of Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, a case that may determine whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 allows a for-profit corporation to deny its employees the health coverage of contraceptives to which the employees are otherwise entitled by federal law, based on the religious objections of the corporation's owners. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 25: Demonstrators rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby March 25, 2014 in Washington, DC. The court heard from lawyers on both sides of Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, a case that may determine whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 allows a for-profit corporation to deny its employees the health coverage of contraceptives to which the employees are otherwise entitled by federal law, based on the religious objections of the corporation's owners. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

SCOTUSblog received angry feedback on Monday from people who thought that it was affiliated with the Supreme Court.

The court ruled that Hobby Lobby and other "closely held" corporations cannot be required to cover contraception for their employees.

SCOTUSblog is a Peabody Award-winning law blog that reported the decision on Monday, but some people clearly didn't know that. They tweeted their outrage with the ruling at the site, and SCOTUSblog decided to respond in what might be the best way possible: by trolling them.

The responses to uninformed haters made us laugh out loud:

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot