NEW YORK -- New York state filed suit on Tuesday against a Buffalo-based bank for allegedly not making home loans in black neighborhoods.
Evans Bank began cutting off services and mortgages to mostly black areas of the city in 2009, according to New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. The lawsuit alleges that the bank refused to solicit customers, market mortgages or even build banks in parts of east Buffalo, where more than 75 percent of the city’s black population lives.
The lawsuit, first reported by The New York Times, charges that the bank mapped out the city and limited its mortgage products to a so-called “trade area” that excluded more than 85,000 black residents, regardless of creditworthiness.
This graphic, created by the attorney general's office and included in the lawsuit, shows Evans Bank branches and ATMs clustered on the border of neighborhoods that are more than 50 percent black.
Banks have been "redlining" black neighborhoods -- highlighting black neighborhoods to avoid -- since at least 1934, when the racist policy was codified into federal law. It is now illegal under the Fair Housing Act.
The Evans case is expected to be the first of several lawsuits against other banks, according to the Times. Evans is also one of several banks recently accused of using the practice in the past few years.
In 2011, Countrywide Financial, which financed 20 percent of all U.S. mortgages in 2006, agreed to pay $335 million to settle allegations that it discriminated against black and Latino borrowers during a four-year period that led up to the financial crisis. A year later, Wells Fargo settled similar accusations by agreeing to pay out at least $175 million. JPMorgan Chase got a lawsuit dismissed last month that accused the country’s largest bank by assets of both denying loans based on race and steering minority borrowers toward mortgages they could not afford, a predatory practice known as “reverse redlining.”
“Redlining is illegal, discriminatory, and must be made a thing of the past, once and for all,” Schneiderman said in a statement on Tuesday. “It is crucial that all New Yorkers, regardless of the color of their skin or the racial composition of their neighborhood, be afforded an equal opportunity to obtain credit.”
David J. Nasca, the president and chief executive of Evans bank, said in a statement sent to HuffPost that he was “disappointed” by the lawsuit, which the bank tried to avert with “several months” of negotiations with Schneiderman’s office.
“We continue to believe these allegations are without any merit and we intend to vigorously challenge them,” Nasca said. “We remain confident that our residential lending practices meet all applicable regulations.”
The lawsuit accused the bank of “bisecting the city” along racial lines. Of the bank’s 14 branches in New York State, 11 are located in Buffalo’s mostly white suburbs. Because of this, just four of the 1,114 mortgage applications in the Buffalo area between 2009 and 2012 were from black residents, according to the lawsuit.
The bank’s marketing policies also prevented it from attracting black customers, the suit claims. According to the charges, the bank limited efforts to “market the full range of loan products and services” to its designated trade area. Print advertising dollars, for example, went only to local newspapers that don’t circulate in east Buffalo neighborhoods, the lawsuit said.
Redlining has helped to make Buffalo one of the most segregated cities in the United States, Schneiderman’s office said.
“Buffalo and Erie County are still suffering from the mortgage crisis,” said Joseph Kelemen, the executive director of the Western New York Law Center, a legal nonprofit that provides free services to people facing foreclosures. “Redlining compounds the effects of that crisis by denying individuals access to homes, jobs and economic opportunity, and the result is that entire neighborhoods are prevented from recovering and developing.”
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.