NEW YORK -- New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet recently announced plans to eliminate 100 jobs through voluntary buyouts or layoffs, marking another grim occasion for the beleaguered newspaper industry. Still, he noted, the Times has weathered previous cutbacks "better than most" and has preserved "a large and strong newsroom."
Baquet's right. Not only does the Times boast a large newsroom after three rounds of layoffs and buyouts, but the paper actually employs roughly the same number as it did at its peak in early 2008: 1,330. The Times has cut hundreds of jobs over the past five years, like other newspapers responding to plummeting print advertising revenue. But unlike the competition, the Times has kept hiring and is expected to add staff in areas like digital, video, mobile and audience engagement.
The Times is currently accepting buyout applications through Oct. 17 in an effort to eliminate those 100 jobs, but a spokeswoman told The Huffington Post in an email that the paper is also "continuing to invest in areas where we see future growth potential and that includes hiring."
That fits a pattern at the Times, which has more recalibrated than downsized its newsroom through buyouts and layoffs over the past five years -- even as the newspaper industry contracted and U.S. fell into an economic recession.
The Times had 1,332 newsroom employees in early 2008 when management announced plans to cut 100 jobs. But even after those cuts, with roughly 1,230 newsroom staffers remaining, the Times noted that it still topped the competition: No other newspaper newsroom had more than 900.
In October 2009, the Times -- then at 1,250 newsroom staffers -- decided to cut another 100 jobs, a dark moment later immortalized in Andrew Rossi's 2011 documentary "Page One." By the end of 2009, the Times' newsroom was at roughly 1,150 staffers, which, as the paper once again pointed out, was still 400 more than at any other newspaper newsroom.
By the end of 2011, the Times' newsroom had inched up to 1,189 staffers, according to statistics provided to The Huffington Post. A year later, the Times' newsroom reached 1,226 employees as former executive editor Jill Abramson sought to cut around 30 newsroom management positions. Several high-ranking Times staffers departed in that round and now hold senior positions at ProPublica, Bloomberg and Mashable.
Since the benefit of taking a buyout increases with seniority, higher-ranking and presumably better-paid staffers are most likely to apply. That potentially frees up money in the newsroom budget to replenish the ranks with employees who are often more junior-level and lower-paid. So even with a round of buyouts in early 2013, the Times finished the year with 1,251 newsroom staffers -- a net gain of 25 from the previous year.
The Times eliminated a number of legacy print positions through these three staff reductions, while at the same time hiring staff for digital, mobile and video. The paper has also continued to invest in lifestyle coverage, such as T Magazine and Styles, as well as expanding divisions like data and graphics. The Times is also now building an audience engagement team. So far in 2014, the Times' newsroom has grown by 79 staffers to its current total of 1,330.
That's now twice the number of staffers at The Washington Post, which like the Times has been through a series of buyouts and layoffs in recent years. Even after a hiring binge under its new owner, Amazon chief Jeff Bezos, the paper boasts only 650 newsroom staffers, down from a peak of 900 in the mid-2000s.
The Los Angeles Times, which had 1,200 newsroom employees in 2001, was reduced to about 550 over the next decade through a series of cutbacks. A Los Angeles Times spokesperson declined to provide the most recent newsroom figures.
Clarification: Language has been added to make clear that the "several high-ranking staffers" who left the Times in 2012 did not all immediately go on to positions at the publications named.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.