ABC Cannot Be Sued For Airing Man's Death On 'NY Med,' Court Says

ABC Avoids Lawsuit Over 'NY Med'
In this image provided by ABC, a cameraman records a medical procedure in an operating room in a scene from the latest season of "NY Med," premiering Thursday, June 26, 2014, at 10 p.m. EDT. (AP Photo/ABC, Donna Svennevik)
In this image provided by ABC, a cameraman records a medical procedure in an operating room in a scene from the latest season of "NY Med," premiering Thursday, June 26, 2014, at 10 p.m. EDT. (AP Photo/ABC, Donna Svennevik)

By Daniel Wiessner

NEW YORK, Nov 18 (Reuters) - The widow of a man whose death was aired on a reality show cannot hold ABC or the hospital that treated him liable for inflicting emotional distress, a New York appeals court has ruled.

The Manhattan court on Tuesday said ABC's conduct in filming the 2012 episode of "NY Med" was not extreme or outrageous enough to allow Anita Chanko's $5 million suit to proceed.

Chanko's husband, Mark Chanko, was hit by a truck in 2012 and died shortly after arriving at New York-Presbyterian Hospital. ABC aired his last words - "Does my family know?" - and showed doctors pronouncing him dead, according to the suit.

Chanko said ABC, a unit of Walt Disney Co, had robbed her husband of a dignified death and the hospital had violated patient privacy rights. A state judge in January rejected a bid by ABC and the hospital to dismiss the suit.

In refusing the case on Tuesday, the appeals court said Mark Chanko was not identified by name and his face was blurred out. The hospital did no wrong because it did not release any confidential medical information, the court said.

A lawyer and a spokesman for ABC did not return requests for comment. Nor did Chanko's attorney.

"NY Med" debuted in 2012 and has featured staff and patients at five hospitals in New York City and New Jersey. ABC has aired similar shows about Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore and three hospitals in Boston.

The case is Anita Chanko v. American Broadcasting Companies Inc, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, No. 13522. (Reporting by Daniel Wiessner; Editing by Ted Botha and Steve Orlofsky)

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot