Kerry Questions Netanyahu's Foreign Policy Cred, Mocks Him For Iraq War Support

02/25/2015 03:57 pm ET | Updated Feb 25, 2015
POOL via Getty Images

WASHINGTON -- Secretary of State John Kerry stepped into contentious territory on Wednesday when he made a critical remark about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s judgement record on U.S. foreign policy.

The comments came while Kerry was testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Committee member Rep. Albio Sires (D-N.J.) pointed to Netanyahu’s upcoming address to the U.S. Congress as evidence of the weakness of the deal being negotiated between Iran, the United States and five other world powers over Iran's nuclear program.

“The Prime Minister was also profoundly forward-leaning and very outspoken about the importance of invading Iraq and George W. Bush,” the secretary of state shot back, referring to Netanyahu.

Sixth months before the U.S. invaded Iraq, Netanyahu, who previously served as Israel's prime minister from 1996 to 1999, was invited to testify before the House to offer an Israeli perspective on the advisability of toppling Saddam Hussein. "If you take out Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region," Netanyahu said at the time. "The task and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also to transform that society and thereby begin the process of democratizing the Arab world."

Kerry, who voted for the Iraq war while serving in the Senate, added on Wednesday that Netanyahu had been "extremely outspoken about how bad the interim agreement was, calling it the ‘deal of the century for Iran.’”

The secretary of state's comments were a reference to the temporary deal with Iran that the U.S. and its negotiating partners reached in November 2013. The deal has been extended twice as diplomats attempt to reach a permanent agreement.

"Israel is safer today with the added time we have given and the stoppage of the advances in the nuclear program than they were before we got that agreement, which, by the way, the prime minister opposed," Kerry continued. "He was wrong."

Kerry's comments are yet another indication of the deepening rift between Netanyahu and the Obama administration. In what White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest has described as a breach of typical protocol, last month Netanyahu accepted an invitation from House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to speak before Congress, without first notifying the White House. Netanyahu’s address will take place March 3, two weeks before the Israeli elections, and will focus on the threat posed by a nuclear-armed Iran.

Earlier this week, Netanyahu said, "This agreement, if indeed it is signed, will allow Iran to become a nuclear threshold state. That is, with the consent of the major powers, Iran –- which openly declares its intention to destroy the state of Israel –- will receive a license to develop the production of bombs."

He added, "It is my obligation as Prime Minister to do everything that I can to prevent this agreement; therefore, I will go to Washington to address the American Congress because the American Congress is likely to be the final brake before the agreement between the major powers and Iran."

The Obama administration has continually clashed with Congress, particularly congressional Republicans, over Iran policy. Members of Congress have called for additional sanctions on Iran, while President Barack Obama has threatened to veto further punitive measures. But even some of those who are skeptical of the negotiating efforts were offended by Netanyahu and Boehner’s defiance of the president. A growing list of lawmakers has joined Obama and Vice President Joe Biden in boycotting Netanyahu's address.

On Wednesday, Kerry warned lawmakers against judging an agreement that has not yet been reached. His entreaty was largely ignored by some members of the committee, including Chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), who told the secretary that it is a matter of “when,” not “if” Iran cheats on its obligations under any nuclear deal that is agreed to.

Sires urged Kerry to recall his days as a senator and to understand that it is difficult for Congress to quietly wait to be handed what he called a “fait accompli” on Iran’s nuclear program.

In an effort to give Congress more input about a final agreement, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has introduced a bill that gives Obama three days to submit the text of any negotiated deal to Congress for a 15-day review period. If Congress doesn’t approve of the agreement, the bill calls for the reimposition of any sanctions on Iran that have been lifted.

Although the subject of Wednesday's committee hearing was the State Department budget, Kerry ended up fielding more questions about the nuclear negotiations with Iran, as was the case with his testimony Tuesday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

This story has been updated to include further context about Netanyahu's support for the 2003 Iraq invasion.

  • Ahmadinejad out, Rouhani in
    The thaw in relations owes a lot to this guy - president Hassan Rouhani, who was elected in June 2013. In the 19 months between the British embassy closing and Rouhani's election, relations between Britain and Iran failed to improve - Britain even sending a warship to the Gulf over fears Iran may block the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. But Rouhani's election marks a sea change. He is seen as more moderate than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and is elected promising to improve relations with the West. His election prompts Britain to say it is interested in improving relations "step by step".
  • Rouhani addresses the UN
    Rouhani visits New York City in September 2013, three months after his election. It is seen as a major break with his predecessor's line on "The Great Satan" and signals a desire to improve US/Iran relations. He addresses the UN, saying "peace is within reach" and offers negotiations to allay "reasonable concerns" the West has over his country's nuclear programme. In the same month, foreign secretary William Hague meets with his Iranian counterpart. Hague said he welcomed Iran's offers to slow down its uranium enrichment programme.
  • Obama and Rouhani's historic phone call
    September 28 2013 - A 15-minute phone call between Obama and Rouhani is hailed as a historic moment that ends the 34-year diplomatic freeze between the two countries. It is the first conversation between an American and Iranian leader since 1979. Rouhani tweeted about the conversation, saying Obama ended it by saying "goodbye" in Farsi. After historic phone conversation with @BarackObama, President #Rouhani in plane abt to depart for Tehran. #UNGA pic.twitter.com/TFtLWxbbaV— Hassan Rouhani (@HassanRouhani) September 27, 2013
  • Diplomats exchanged
    In the same month, foreign secretary William Hague meets with his Iranian counterpart. Hague said he welcomed Iran's offers to slow down its uranium enrichment programme. In October, Hague and Mohammad Javad Zarif (pictured right) announced that the countries will exchange diplomats with a view to re-opening permanent embassies in each country.
  • Cameron calls Rouhani
    November 2013 - After Obama becomes the first American president to call the Iranian leader in 34 years, David Cameron calls him too, becoming the first prime minister to do so in more than a decade. "The two leaders discussed the bilateral relationship between Britain and Iran welcoming the steps taken since President Rouhani took office," a Downing Street spokesman says. "They agreed to continue efforts to improve the relationship on a step by step and reciprocal basis." Cameron also implores Rouhani to be "more transparent" with Iran's nuclear programme, Downing Street says.
  • About that embassy...
    Suddenly, being friends became a lot more urgent when ISIS took Mosul, Iraq's second city, and began tearing through the country executing opponents and imposing strict Islamic law on the population. The Sunni militants' rise has been blamed on the pro-Shia stance of Iraq's Malaki government. Under Saddam, the country's Sunni minority dominated political life and fought an eight-year with Iran, which is a Shia majority country and does not like the idea of a terrorist army on its doorstep.
Suggest a correction