SALFORD, England, April 2 (Reuters) - The main TV debate of Britain's national election campaign yielded no clear winner on Thursday with three opinion polls producing four different winners, but David Cameron's attempt to appear the most statesman-like appeared to have paid off.
The event was staged less than six weeks before an unusually close national election on May 7 as polls continue to suggest Cameron's Conservatives and Ed Miliband's opposition Labor Party are neck-and-neck with neither on track to win a majority.
The results of three snap opinion polls released immediately afterwards underscored why the election - that will decide who governs Britain's $2.8 trillion economy - is being widely described as the closest and most unpredictable since the 1970s with voters naming no less than four winners.
One poll said Scottish nationalist leader Nicola Sturgeon had won, another said Labor's Miliband had narrowly triumphed, and a third said Cameron, Miliband and UK Independence Party leader (UKIP) Nigel Farage had come joint first.
None of the leaders managed to deliver a "killer line" that would set them apart from the other participants.
"There was clearly no knock-out blow," said Peter Kellner of pollster YouGov.
Jonny Tudor, 17, who asked the first question of the night, told Reuters afterwards: "I don't think there was a clear winner, each leader performed at different levels. Some performed well in answer to certain questions, other performed well on different subjects, but there was no definitive winner."
But in a result that will calm Conservative nerves, a Comres/ITV poll showed 40 percent of voters asked afterwards judged Cameron was the most capable of leading Britain, compared to 28 percent who named Miliband.
In an unusual format for Britain, Cameron faced off against six political rivals in what was the first and only full TV debate of a campaign that has yet to stir voters, many of whom say they feel jaded despite a rising economy.
The ITV debate, held in a former pie factory near the northern city of Manchester, ranged across the economy, the health service and immigration in front of a strangely quiet studio audience.
It put leaders of traditionally fringe parties like UKIP and Natalie Bennett, the leader of the left-wing Green Party, on an equal footing with the Conservatives and Labor, who have dominated British politics for decades.
Sturgeon, the leader of Scotland's nationalists, joined Welsh nationalist leader Leanne Wood and Nick Clegg, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, the junior party in the country's coalition, to complete the lineup.
Cameron, whose personal ratings are higher than those of his rivals, came off badly from Britain's first televised election debates in 2010. Over the course of three such debates, strong performances by Clegg were credited with helping deprive the Conservatives of an outright victory.
This time, Cameron has successfully resisted pressure to take part in a head-to-head debate with Labor leader Miliband, not wanting to hand his main rival a chance to improve his low personal ratings.
Nor will he take part in a planned second pre-election debate, dubbed the 'challengers' debate', which will feature the five parties outside the current coalition government.
He and Miliband were last week subjected to separate but back-to-back question and answer sessions on TV. A snap opinion poll afterwards suggested Cameron had come off better, but later polls showed Miliband had exceeded expectations. (Writing by Andrew Osborn; Editing by Guy Faulconbridge)
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.