Readers of The New York Times appear to have given up on Gravity Payments CEO Dan Price's idea of setting his company's minimum salary at $70,000.
The newspaper on Monday published a five-paragraph call-out to readers, asking them to weigh in on whether they would follow the lead of the now financially troubled entrepreneur, who in April slashed his own $1 million salary down to $70,000 and gave most of his lowest-paid workers raises.
The responses, overall, were cynical.
Price is in dire straits. Following the initial celebrity he enjoyed for his virally praised decision, things went awry.
Some clients abandoned his payment-processing service, fearing -- despite reassurances -- a price hike to offset the cost of the salary bump, according to a feature published last week by the Times. Other clients left in opposition to a principle they saw as naive at best, and mildly socialist at worst. A few of the company's seasoned employees, angry that newcomers were making so much, quit. Though Price received love letters and marriage proposals after his big announcement, he also got condescending hate-mail. His own brother sued him.
"We aren't out to avoid challenges or hard times, we are out to stick up for the little gal or guy who is fighting for the American Dream. Being willing to sacrifice comes with the territory and it is a privilege to do so in service to our clients," Price told The Huffington Post on Tuesday morning. "There are lots of things I could have done better, and I don't have all of the answers, but I will always put our mission above maximizing short-term profit."
His recent misfortune seems to have left Times readers feeling rather hopeless about the $70,000 salary idea and how it was executed.
If not outright dismissive of the plan in the first place, many seemed to feel Price was naive, if well-intentioned:
"While I believe what Mr. Price did is admirable, I think he would have benefitted from reading 'wealth of nations,' wrote one commenter, who went by Anthony. "I'm not knocking this gentleman, he seems like a very stand up guy, and I'd love to see this work. However, it won't, and it will hurt his company on a few levels [all sic]."
Others compared it to the bankrupt fictional firm from Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged:
"Gravity Payments is the 2015 version of the 20th Century Motor Company in Atlas Shrugged. With the same results," wrote one commenter under the screen-name slothb77.
Some critiqued Gravity's move for eliminating an incentive to work harder:
"There has to be performance and results tied to it otherwise the company will falter in the long term," wrote a commenter who went by Ryan. "There will be a brain drain on the higher end of the spectrum while the lower end of the employee spectrum will have a higher tendency to slack off."
Others wrote off the decision to set the $70,000 baseline as a clever PR move:
"If a company is vastly overpaying its janitors, and it has only one janitor, nothing is going to be happen [sic]," wrote commenter K.H. "And the company earns plenty of positive publicity from a bunch of souls that are naive enough to believe in this publicity stunt."
Still, a handful held out hope:
"This move will clear out the deadwood [sic], make room for new enthusiasm and despite some hiccups I believe his business will thrive," wrote commenter Donna Chasteau. "More importantly he [Price] will thrive, knowing he has done the right thing."
"If I was the company CEO and I felt the profit margins would allow for a salary increase without causing shortages of materials, work space, or safety in the work place......... Absolutely I would," wrote Gee Willers. "And I applaud Dan Price for being a boss who has spent more than 5 minutes of his own personal time thinking about how he can improve his employees quality of life [all sic]."
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.