Following Mitt Romney's defeat in his run for president in 2012, his Republican party did what all parties do: It went through a mourning period. Officials dished, often anonymously, about mistakes the campaign made and began searching for a new path to victory.
The internal debates and public handwringing produced two prescriptions that were very much at odds.
Seasoned operatives argued that in order for the GOP to win back the White House, the party needed to be more inclusive, with toned down rhetoric and legislative pursuits like immigration reform. Others inside the GOP were convinced that Romney had lost not because he alienated people of color and female voters, but because he just wasn't inspirationally conservative enough.
Advertisement
That internal party debate persists on the campaign trail today. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is making a case that the party needs to inspire its base, while Jeb Bush (R-Fla.), John Kasich (R-Ohio) and others want to expand the party’s appeal (while still brandishing their conservative bonafides).
That two diametrically different conclusions could be drawn from one electoral defeat shouldn't be surprising. Pinpointing a singular, persuasive lesson from the 2012 race has been difficult even for those who ran the Romney campaign.
In the latest episode of Candidate Confessional, Stuart Stevens, Romney's top strategist, revisits the stumbles, missteps, high points and ultimately painful conclusion of that race. He provides some incredible stories (sorry, you're gonna have to listen for those), and valuable insights about Republican presidential politics.
Advertisement
Despite popular perceptions, Stevens says that the data doesn't show that Obama won because of his campaign's famous "Get Out The Vote" operation -- which, Stevens added, is not exactly reassuring news for Republicans. "It’s a more sober conclusion to come to, say 70,000 more African-Americans voted in Ohio because they wanted to vote ... not because there was a half-dozen smart people in a cave," he said.
And even though the Romney campaign seemed to crumble after the candidate was caught on tape claiming that 47 percent of the country was willfully dependent on government largesse, Stevens didn't see that as particularly consequential.
"It was an interesting piece of video," he said, dismissively. "I don’t think it made any difference in the race."
What did make a difference, at least from Steven's vantage point, was that a massive hurricane touched down on the eastern seaboard shortly before people went to vote. A president who was looking for a message suddenly was being praised for his poise and leadership.
Advertisement
“It definitely had a huge impact," said Stevens. “It definitely cost us Florida. I think it definitely cost us Virginia. I can’t tell you if it cost Ohio. I can't tell you it cost us Colorado."
Obama did win both Florida and Virginia by close margins. And polling showed high favorability in his handling of the response to Hurricane Sandy. But did a storm really cost Romney the presidency?
It's impossible to say, said Stevens. Even if Romney had won those two states, Obama still had the electoral college votes to win. At a minimum, however, Sandy complicated the closing argument that Stevens had been hoping to make. And because of that, it has become harder for Republicans to draw clearer lessons from that 2012 loss.
"Every time I’ve ever defeated an incumbent, it’s like an NBA game at the end, [it’s] close, you have to control the ball,” Stevens said. “So, [Hurricane Sandy] took away your ability to control the ball. Now, it’s not to say that on that Thursday you wouldn’t have gone out and said something really stupid and lost by more. You don’t know. But it took away that ability.”
Listen to the podcast above, or download it on iTunes. And while you're there, please subscribe to, rate and review our show. Make sure to tune in to next week's episode, when our guest will be Wendy Davis, the Democratic candidate for governor of Texas in 2014.
Advertisement
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.