McCain to Military: Homosexuality Not A Defect

Posted November 19, 2006 | 05:39 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :McCain to Military: Homosexuality Not A Defect   digg: McCain to Military: Homosexuality Not A Defect   reddit: McCain to Military: Homosexuality Not A Defect   del.icio.us: McCain to Military: Homosexuality Not A Defect

What a strange week for gays in the military. Earlier this week, Huffington Post reported that an official, recently-revised military document now suggests that homosexuality is a "defect".

Strangely, some observers, including leaders in the gay-rights community, said that the designation was "no big deal". Then, this morning, Senator John McCain told ABC News This Week anchor George Stephanopoulos homosexuality is not, after all, a defect.

What is going on?

First the background: The offending document is Department of Defense Instruction 1332.38, "Physical Disability Evaluation". Its purpose is to help military administrators figure out how to compensate troops who separate from the armed forces, and who request compensation for injuries they suffered in uniform.

The military wants to be sure that some conditions, such as bed-wetting and certain mental disorders, cannot form the basis of a petition for compensation. Until this summer, homosexuality was included on the document's list of mental disorders.

When the matter was brought to the attention of the media, however, an uproar forced the Pentagon to make changes. The revised document no longer lists homosexuality as a mental disorder, suggesting instead that it is a "condition, circumstance or defect." Then, this past week, Congressman Marty Meehan wrote to the Defense Department requesting that the military revise the document...again.

Some gay rights groups don't think that the matter is very important. And in a sense, they're right. According to this perspective, the focus must be on more central issues, in particular "don't ask, don't tell" (DADT), the law which requires the military to fire anyone found out to be gay.

There's another way of seeing things, however.

In particular, a large body of legal theory discusses what it means when laws and regulations designate some groups as normal and others as deserving of stigma. This is not just a question of hurt feelings, but rather one of legal precedent. If homosexuality is classified as a defect in one official document, what is to stop a mean-spirited legislator from trying to amplify the standard to other policies and laws?

DADT will, of course, remain the target of gay rights activists who work on military matters. And Senator McCain will remain one of the toughest opponents in the struggle for repeal.

But it is good to know that, at very least, the Senator agrees that homosexuality is not a defect.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 



Comments for this entry are currently under maintenance but will be restored soon.



 
 
Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Aaron Belkin›
 

 Site  Web ask.com