More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Aaron Belkin

GET UPDATES FROM Aaron Belkin
 

Notes from the White House

Posted: 12/16/11 01:29 AM ET

I was honored to attend policy briefings and a reception at the White House this week along with hundreds of activists and community leaders from around the country. It was a fascinating opportunity to take the temperature of the progressive base, in that participants represented a wide range of organizations working on everything from health care to immigration to the environment.

The media has reported widely about the left's dissatisfaction with the Obama administration. But if the enthusiasm I saw at the White House is at all reflective of broader trends, then the base is much more optimistic about the administration and the campaign than has been reported.
2011-12-16-Obamahandshake2.JPG
From what I could tell from the tone and content of question-and-answer sessions as well as one-on-one conversations that I had after the briefings, there was a near-consensus that the President has solved some of the nation's most critical problems:

(1) Preventing the economy from falling off a cliff. The economy was shrinking at an astounding annual rate of 7% when Obama took office. His policies brought us back from the brink;

(2) Providing health care for all. Obama got a pretty good bill through Congress, a bill that has extended coverage to more than 2 million kids. The bill has already saved lives and it will save many more;

(3) Ending the war in Iraq. It is difficult to end a war, even an unpopular one, but most of our troops are now home;

(4) Re-regulating the financial system. Dodd-Frank isn't Glass-Steagall, but it establishes important protections and enhances stability and transparency.

Stamping out unemployment is a top-priority area, of course, where the activists and community leaders agreed that the President has not yet had reached his goals. But everyone recognized that Republicans fought tooth and nail to block additional stimulus, and that the President's policies nonetheless yielded 20+ months in a row of private sector job growth.

And at the same time that he was ending a war and staving off economic collapse, the activists and community leaders were impressed that the President found Osama bin Laden, rescued the auto industry, got the START treaty through Congress, curtailed torture and cowboy diplomacy, ended "don't ask, don't tell," and appointed wise and thoughtful justices to the Supreme Court.

Everyone I spoke with recognizes that there is a lot of work left to be done, especially in the areas of climate change, labor policy, tax fairness and immigration. And, everyone wishes that health care and financial re-regulation bills were more expansive.

But folks agreed that by any reasonable standard, this administration's accomplishments have been historic. Their enthusiasm isn't just a reflection of distaste for the Republicans, but represents a genuine and, I believe, accurate sense that President Obama is an outstanding public servant.

The election is almost a year away, but the President's foot soldiers are ready to go.

####

POSTSCRIPT: In reading the comments below, I am reminded of Nader voters in Florida who said in 2000 that there was no difference between Gore and Bush. I have been publicly critical of the Obama administration in the past, and I continue to agree wholeheartedly with the comments of a progressive leader who said just after the 2008 election that the left has to be just as tough and frank with Obama as he will be with us. All that said, this is an election year, and for anyone who is concerned about a Gingrich or Romney administration, it is time to have the President's back. My sense of the activists and community leaders who I met in Washington is that they are glad to take up the challenge.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 54
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:58 AM on 01/10/2012
You should be honoring Pres. George W. Bush: On November 27, 2008, the Iraqi Parliament ratified a Status of Forces Agreement with the United States, establishing that U.S. combat forces will withdraw from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, and all U.S. forces will be completely out of Iraq by December 31, 2011, signed by President Bush on December 14, 2008. Please report the facts!
05:08 PM on 12/16/2011
I do not care for the sitting President, however he is at least sorta doing what the American people need him to do.
I wish his administration was more transparent, as promised.
I wish he would have more backbone when dealing with Congress.
I wish he spent less time "campaigning" and more time pushing Congress. (but I have problems with ALL elected officials who run while holding office, it should be illegal, since incumbants can run on thier record...)
I wish he would stop being an activist, and start representing ALL Americans, not just the "have nots".
I wish his actions matched his retoric a little more often, but hey we have that problem with all politicos.
I wish he would realize that the Federal Government IS NOT the solution to all ills facing this country.
I wish he would find and VET better adminstrators for all positions he appoints, he keeps putting in unqualified and sometimes conflicted appointments, many of which helped create some of the problems we have now.
I wish he didn't hate a large portion of the Americas populance, because he doesn't understand them, ie gun toting, bible loving Americans.

I do not see how he can possibly lose this election. (If the Dems lose this election, they should just give it up.)

But I won't be helping, I cannot vote for him, I personaly don't trust the guy. But good luck.
12:45 PM on 01/06/2012
I wish you knew how to use paragraphs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gutenmorgen
a.k.a. poopdeck
03:37 PM on 12/16/2011
If I had a scales like Lady Justice and placed all these good things Obama has done on the right-hand scale and his handling of the wars in Afghanistan/Pakistan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, the delay of the retreat from Iraq (he could have done this soon after inauguration), and his incessant threats against Iran on the left-hand scale my left-hand scale would sink fast and no amount of hot-air propaganda speeches from the White House could stop it.
03:32 PM on 12/16/2011
They did NOT prevent the economy from falling off a cliff - they saved the wealthy bankers etc - everyone else's econmy is in rubble at the bottom.
12:59 PM on 01/06/2012
A. The economy was shrinking at an astounding annual rate of 7% when Obama took office.

B. everyone recognized that Republicans fought tooth and nail to block additional stimulus, and that the President's policies nonetheless yielded 20+ months in a row of private sector job growth.

What about this do you not understand?
03:01 PM on 12/16/2011
You are joking, right? I don't know if I am part of the "base", but I have voted for a democraven (my view of them after all this time) presidential candidate every election since I turned 18 in 1984. But Obama was the last straw.

"Providing health care for all. Obama got a pretty good bill through Congress, a bill that has extended coverage to more than 2 million kids. The bill has already saved lives and it will save many more."

The health care bill was worse than nothing, not only can I not afford health insurance (which I don't even want, I want health care) since 1993, now the IRS will fine me around $1k per year. Thanks for nothing (which would have been better).

In the 2010 election I wrote in "public option" for every office in which a left third party was not running (quite a few here in FL), and I will be doing the same in 2012.
01:30 PM on 01/06/2012
The ACA ended the worst abuses of the insurance industry like recission and the ability to retroactively deny benefits based on pre-existing conditions, and If the mandate is upheld, it will also bring down costs. Millions who would not be otherwise insured, are already benefitting from it. As for your stance on healthcare, a commodity that you say that you have never paid for, you are basically complaining that it's not free, which is idiotic since the ACA cuts the projected cost of healthcare for everyone in the next 10 years (http://www.healthcare.gov/blog/2011/08/bringingdowncosts082911.html). Your assertion that the ACA was "worse than nothing" just doesn't have a leg to stand on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThatPhotoGuy
Liberal to the end, servant to none
03:00 PM on 12/16/2011
Let's see,
we lost our jobs through no fault of our own.
-haven't gotten new jobs yet
we lost our home, ditto the no fault thing
-BO said he'd help us but didn''t
can't afford health care
-don't know if we'll live to see his far off health care "VOUCHERS"
have unemployment to barely get by on
-he's giving that away to get a pr tax cut for people who already have jobs

Yeah, what a guy that BO is!
01:38 PM on 01/06/2012
Let's see,
we lost our jobs through no fault of our own. - Yeah you can blame Republican deregulation, wall street for that
-haven't gotten new jobs yet - Did you hear Republicans filibustered the jobs bill?
we lost our home, ditto the no fault thing - Maybe you should have applied for Obama's mortgage restructuring plan that didn't exist before.
-BO said he'd help us but didn''t - BO has worked almost singlehandedly to extend unemployment insurance for the middle class during the entirety of the recession.
can't afford health care - Thats what the ACA is addressing as it gets phased in.
-don't know if we'll live to see his far off health care "VOUCHERS" - What?
have unemployme­nt to barely get by on - Somehow BO doesn't get credit for this.
-he's giving that away to get a pr tax cut for people who already have jobs - There are a ton more people who will benefit from the payroll tax cut then unemployment.

People like you scare me. Please get all the facts and stop spreading bogus misinformation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stop the oligarchy
02:54 PM on 12/16/2011
The Nobel Price winner is in the process of launching a war against Iran and Syria in the name of something. The economy has been destroyed and there is no recovery in sight despite the propitiations by the White House.
01:26 PM on 12/16/2011
The economy is better than if Obama had not acted? You know this how? A specious argument at best. Obama did not "provide health care for all". He has not and will never provide health care for a single person. He is not a health care provider. His health care plan will be struck down as unconstitutional and it has not yet really gone into effect so it is difficult to see how it has "saved lives". The draw down of troops in Iraq is according to the schedule agreed upon by Bush, not Obama. It was the surge, which Obama opposed, that snatched victory from the jaws of defeat. All Obama did was "stay the course". The financial system has to be cut loose, not snuggled closer to the Federal govt- no more bailouts to banks or car companies. And, speaking of car companies, Ford took no Federal money yet is doing nicely. All Obama did was preserve the stranglehold of the UAW over the major car makers and then stick the taxpayers with the loss. Great track record. Four more years!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
marco01
02:20 PM on 12/16/2011
Your entire post is specious. How do you know that letting our economic system regain its health on its own would work? Do you have any examples? Providing health care for all does not mean Obama actually performing the health care himself, it means ensuring Americans HAVE health care. As for the auto bailout, Ford wasn't in trouble, GM was. And now GM is doing great, and maybe up to a million jobs were saved. This is a FACT, but since it doesn't fit into your market fundamentalism, you ignore it. It's all principle above reality for you types.
02:52 PM on 12/16/2011
That's pretty funny. I'm not the one out there claiming to have prevented the second depression. You want an example? Cal Coolidge did nothing when several banks failed back in the early twenties and the economy recovered quickly. As a bonus, risk was not rewarded until later, when Hoover and Roosevelt were in the WH. If GM is doing so great, then why have they not paid the taxpayers back? The money they paid back was taxpayer money from a different pot of taxpayer money. Now the Car Czar claims that they don't have to pay the money back at all. I guess now that the unions own the companies, the rules are different. The ACA does not guarantee coverage to all. Period. Even the administration admits this (now that it was shoved through). it does not lower costs and it adds another level of bureaucracy into health care. Good grief, the state boards of medicine are bad enough, how much worse will the Feds be? Before you argue this point name me anything else the Feds fund but do not control. GM wasn't going under, they were going to reorganize without the union legacy costs, becoming more fiscally fit and leaner. I live in the real world, where I have to produce to stay in business. Do you?
01:48 PM on 01/06/2012
Wall of text written by uninformed spindoctor. Nothing to see here folks.
01:17 PM on 12/16/2011
Newsflash: self-congratulatory enthusiasm in the White House isn't representative of anyone else.

They prevented the economy from falling off a cliff, but it was utterly temporary, saving the rich and corporations, and no one else. With unemployment set to be so high for so long, and nothing being done about it, it's a generational fall. Not a cliff, but a rapidly descending fall. Good job.

Healthcare for all? Nope. Millions won't be covered and, because of administration efforts, nothing was done to control costs. It definitively did three things: more poor people got insurance, insurance companies got guaranteed profits, and everyone else gets pounded with ever higher costs. Mission accomplished.

The agreement to end the war was made under Bush.

Re-regulating finance? Nice joke. The largest banks keep growing. Dodd-Frank solved almost nothing. Consumers and investors remain unprotected. None were prosecuted. State's attorneys are the only ones trying, and this administration stands against them. Derivatives remain unregulated. And so on...

Still, I would have voted for Obama again anyway. Now Obama is poised to sign the NDAA, which removes the rule of law by removing the requirement that government to try those it accuses. Indefinite detention without trial. There was precedent for Bush temporarily removing habeus corpus. There's no precedent for removing the right to trial, and permanently enshrining that in law. I can't vote for this. Forget enthusiasm.

Being self-congratulatory really helps. This country is in deep trouble, and it's getting deeper. I'm disgusted.
SapientiaAudit
Tempus Dicit, Sapientia Audit.
01:48 PM on 12/16/2011
F&F.
04:15 PM on 12/16/2011
Nailed it! I don't expect miracles in a town like Washington D.C., but at least be honest with us. This self congratulatory nonsense just reveals how completely out of touch they are. Obama and the Democrats aren't interested in meaningful change, just preserving the status quo. They will not get my vote in the fall.
01:11 PM on 12/16/2011
It is fair to say that the President made a huge mistake by not aggressively working to solve the economic catastrophe when first taking office in 2009, instead wasting over one year on the health care act, apparently trying for consensus with Republicans, and ultimately using the reconciliation process to pass the bill anyway. All of this time the President could have listened to Christine Romer, former Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors in the Obama administration, who reportedly advised the President that the stimulus was too small, and that the economic disaster was much worse than anyone thought upon taking office. Alas, Professor Romer's advice went unheeded, and America, it is fair to say, has been weakened by the subsequent ongoing unemployment catastrophe.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
larrystalcup
12:43 PM on 12/16/2011
no argument that obama has done some things at least partially right. but at what cost? he is following in lockstep with bush in his quest for a bigger and more expansive military, he refuses to make any waves when dealing with wall street who are back to their old antics, and the latest demise to the constitution with his reversal to the veto of the arms bill with upholding the power of the president to arrest and detain americans on american soil without due process..... if you call this winning...what is acquiescing?....ls
11:45 AM on 12/16/2011
President Obama has retracted his veto threat on the National Defense Authorization Act and is apparently going to sign it, despite the fact that it contains Orwellian military imprisonment terms which attempt to completely dispense with the constitutional guarantee of due process of law. This is worse than anything President George W. Bush ever did in regard to civil liberties.

And Mr. Belkin thinks we should support this President? Forget it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masreality
Author of "Misconceptions and realities of life"
11:16 AM on 12/16/2011
The republicans in congress are like bolders, blocking everything proposed to move ahead. Although the president have made some progress and needs more time, he gets no credit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
10:38 AM on 12/16/2011
" the base is much more optimistic about the administration and the campaign than has been reported."

NO
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lolablev
10:33 AM on 12/16/2011
Yay! Excellent report, get the word out!
03:33 PM on 12/16/2011
I only read one fiction book a week.