iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Aaron Taylor

GET UPDATES FROM Aaron Taylor
 

The Triumph of Hypothetical Evil Over Real Evil

Posted: 07/25/2012 7:12 am

There's a famous maxim that says, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Though Wikipedia says otherwise, the statement is often attributed to Edmund Burke.

I doubt that Wikipedia will give me the credit for this 200 years from now, but I'd like to take a crack at a counterpoint to Burke's famous maxim anyway: Sometimes evil triumphs not when good people do nothing, but when good people fail to distinguish between hypothetical evil and real evil, and end up doing something about the former when they should be doing something about the latter.

Case in point: National Conservative Christian radio host Kerby Anderson's attempt to rally his followers to thwart the Senate from ratifying the Arms Trade Treaty.

As I write these words, it's easier to trade weapons around the world than it is to trade bananas and iPads. Whether we're talking about armed militias that terrorize civilian populations (Joseph Kony) or dictators that slaughter their people (Bashar Al-Assad) or insurgents killing American soldiers, the world has yet to come together to negotiate a treaty that would make it difficult for human rights abusers to purchase the weapons to commit their atrocities. The Arms Trade Treaty that's under discussion is about regulating the international transfer of weapons, not the domestic gun laws of individual nations.

According to Amnesty International, the U.S. State Department has explicitly said regarding the ATT, "There will be no restrictions on civilian possession of trade or fire arms otherwise permitted by law or protected by the U.S. Constitution."

One would think that an explicit, unambiguous statement like this from the State Department would settle the issue, but that hasn't stopped Kerby Anderson from sending out e-mails to God-only- knows-how- many followers to urge them to oppose the ATT based on the Obama-is-coming-for-your-guns boogeyman. In an e-mail sent out on July 12, Anderson writes to his followers:

"The Obama administration, working through Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, has been working to advance the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. While some of the rhetoric may sound good on the surface, there is serious concern that this is an attempt at an end run around a Republican controlled congress to enact limitations on our second amendment rights."

Based on what, Mr. Anderson?

The troubling part about the e-mail is that Anderson didn't deem it necessary to provide evidence to back up his claim, which tells me that he took it as a given that his followers would make an a priori assumption that the claim is true regardless of what the State Department has actually said.

Laying aside the question as to whether stricter gun laws here in the U.S. would actually constitute as an "evil," even if Mr. Anderson's position on domestic gun control were the correct one, that still doesn't absolve him from the responsibility to provide credible evidence that the ATT provides an actual threat to the Second Amendment. Assuming that something is true doesn't make it true.

After directing his followers to click on a link to sign a petition urging their Senators to "not vote for the ratification of this treaty," the e-mail goes on to say: "If the Senate, currently under control of the radical left-wing of the Democratic Party, ratifies this treaty it could be used to undermine our rights as American citizens."

Could be, Mr. Anderson?

You're opposing a not-yet-written treaty designed to make it more difficult for thugs, terrorists and crackpot dictators to slaughter innocent people -- something that's actually happening -- based on a could be?

Anderson closes out the e-mail with, "This is one of those times when all that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

Or maybe sometimes it's better for good people to make sure that the evil they seek to thwart is a real evil and not a hypothetical one. Millions of Christians in Africa are praying for the negotiation of a robust international Arms Trade Treaty. Unlike rich, white American radio hosts, they know what real evil looks like when unregulated weapons and ammo pour into their countries, ending up in the hands of militants that rape and slaughter their spouses and children.

Let's hope that the prayers of millions of African Christians don't go unanswered because of a few American Christians afraid that a Democratically elected president wants to steal their guns so that a future dictator might have the power to haul them off to concentration camps.

 
 
 

Follow Aaron Taylor on Twitter: www.twitter.com/aarondtaylor

FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Lee Smyth
a nomadic view
11:44 AM on 08/09/2012
This treaty is something that will pass and our government will ignore it as they see fit. It is for International Consumption...to make us not look like war mongers. The US sells more weapons internationally than anyone else...many times through foreign subsidiaries. Many times we sell weapons to both sides of the conflict, or weapons are sold to the other side by France, China, or Russia. Do you really think that the corporationist republic that we have become will want to miss any sales? We still sell land mines for goodness sake.
09:36 PM on 07/31/2012
The U.S. should not become a signatory to this treaty. We should decide, based on our own views of our interests and of right and wrong, what arms we should and should not sell or provide. We should remain accountable to no one but ourselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Lee Smyth
a nomadic view
11:40 AM on 08/09/2012
Iran/Contra?
10:03 AM on 07/31/2012
So, these dictators and arms dealers that are breaking existing international laws, to say nothing of the laws in their own countries, are supposed to care about more international laws? You really think the US, Great Britain, Russia, China and numerous 3rd world countries are going to stop manufacturing and selling weapons because the U.N. tells them to?

Western banks are the ones financing these dictators when the current leaders demand more money for their country's natural resources. The only thing this treaty will accomplish is raising the prices charged by arms smugglers.
03:10 AM on 07/30/2012
theres plenty of treaties and plenty of dead people. those that want to kill don't care about any treaties, its not a political issue, its a killing issue
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Lee Smyth
a nomadic view
11:46 AM on 08/09/2012
Actually, I think it is more of a money issue. Arms makers have managed to force our military to buy crap they don't want and our gov't spends million doing R&D on things after the Pentagon has said quite clearly that it will not meet their needs, or is unsafe etc....do the names Guardian and Osprey ring a bell....it is all about the $$$$$.
photo
lokitheviking
new triple bottom line ; profit, people, planet
10:32 PM on 07/28/2012
Yeah, this is the real stuff, the big picture. The Trans-national merchants of death get regulated or they don't. Are we going to take some collective responsibility to reduce real evil or not. Individual rights and liberties are not compromised when we accept collective responsiblity to reasonably regulate trade. Freedom fighters or terrorists ? Neither if we resolve conflict with ballots instead of bullets.
09:37 PM on 07/31/2012
The US should decide on what basis it will or will not trade arms to other countries. We should stay out of this treaty, and keep our hands completely free to do what we think is best.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Lee Smyth
a nomadic view
11:49 AM on 08/09/2012
We will just ignore it and go underground...Iran/Contra...selling chemical weapons to Iraq...
I ask you to look at the disastrous policies of the US in Latin America...helping keep bloodthirsty tyrants in power seemed to be the order of the century...
04:55 PM on 07/26/2012
So when Libya (On the Human Rights Commission) purchased arms from the United Kingdom, were they "human rights violators"? Did they report themselves to the commission so the transport would be blocked? Who decides on the "no-sale" list? If the US wants to send weapons to lets say Germany, what if Russia and China placed them on the "violators" list? Or the other way around?
de-meme-ing
Buying USA Feeds USA, Supports/Preserves USA
10:27 AM on 07/26/2012
I just want someone to explain to me how they plan on getting all these high powered weapons out of the hands of criminals, or terrorists for that matter?

Shall we ask politely, and if so does anyone think they will comply?
08:51 PM on 07/25/2012
I occasionally listen to Christian conservative radio and am amazed at how utterly un-Christlike Kerby and his associates are in their commentaries. It's almost like they removed everything Jesus said from the Bible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Lee Smyth
a nomadic view
11:53 AM on 08/09/2012
They are hawking the Old Testament...Saul wiped out entire cities, man, woman and child. David conquered Jerusalem...the Canaanites had genocide committed against them...
Ghandi said, to paraphrase-I like your Jesus Christ very much but I do not like most Christians, they are very much unlike Christ.
07:33 PM on 07/25/2012
A Christian radio host is rallying Christians to stop the signing of an arms treaty?

Who has the 'Only in America..' stamp?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phyllis Copeland
Shout into the void, don't weep in the darkness
02:16 AM on 07/26/2012
I suspect it's in the shop for it's 10,000 mile tune up ... ;-)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Saint Brian the Godless
Visit me at Saint Brian's Chronicles
01:41 PM on 07/25/2012
Gays, God and Guns. The holy trinity of American christianity. WWJD? Shoot the poor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
02:17 PM on 07/25/2012
WWJD? Probably run for cover when some of these self-declared 'good Christians' attack Him and his policies.
03:21 PM on 07/25/2012
Let's see - a long-haired Palestinian who wanted to come here? He'd be one of those who certain "good Christian" politicians think should be shot from helicopters.
11:17 AM on 07/25/2012
The problem the West has is a deep rooted philosophical one, that is the Platonic fantasy that there is abstract good, when in fact there is only actual good either done or not done in the real world, which is all we have. And then there is the problem is what 'good' is. As perceived by well intentioned Americans for example, who actually think killing people in war can be 'humanitarian'. Only in the abstract. In reality, it's murder pure and simple.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:04 AM on 07/26/2012
Interesting observations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Lee Smyth
a nomadic view
11:55 AM on 08/09/2012
I would disagree only in the context of defense. Pacifism does not work in the context of the shoot first society that seems to be in control of things.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradlinsky
Concept Other Than Self
10:12 AM on 07/25/2012
Excellent points here, IMO. And while smart, self-thinking people can see his lies for what they are, the people he is speaking to will take it as 'fact'. Then they will add this little kernel of innuendo to the long list of things that buttress their already made-up (taught?) opinions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Hazelwood
Free speech sure has gotten expensive.
10:01 AM on 07/25/2012
ERMAGAWD ME GUNZ ER GETTIN TOOK FRUM ME
03:22 PM on 07/25/2012
Yeah, and all the people who believe that letter are the ones who are already armed to the teeth, or would be if they had any teeth left.