Last Thursday, the Wall Street Journal ran a front-page story on James Cayne, CEO of Bear Stearns, that -- in its snarky reliance on the tabloid tools of innuendo, unattributed reporting and unbalanced, agenda-heavy journalism -- should answer the question of whether the newspaper will be different in the Murdoch era.
The story attempts to portray Mr. Cayne as dangerously out of touch and uninvolved during the July sub-meltdown, and the collapse of two Bear Stearns hedge funds.
Why is this a front-page story? There's nothing new -- other than the sensationalist allegations of pot smoking. The other factoids relating to Mr. Cayne's golfing and bridge playing in the heat of the crisis had already been reported elsewhere.
But that's the way tabloid journalism works. You take facts that have been published, add in some sexy new (and denied) allegations, weave them together into a sensationalist narrative -- in this case, the CEO fiddling while Rome burns -- and voila, you've got yourself hot, front-pager.
What's telling is that all the positive quotes -- and there are a bunch of them, to be fair -- are disclosed. And all the negative ones are unattributed. When you can't get one person to speak on the record about the bad stuff, any responsible journalist should reconsider the story.
Consider these weasels and caveats sprinkled toxically through the piece:
• "...according to someone who was there..."
• "On July 12th, chatting with visitors over lunch..."
• "On another occasion, he told a visitor..."
• "...according to people familiar with the calls..."
• "Mr. Cayne had left, say two people who were there with him..."
Beyond these unsubstantiated allegations is the invidious comparison between Mr. Cayne's purportedly disengaged management style, and that of other CEOs of sub-prime plagued companies. The Journal story apotheosizes Mr. Dimon of J.P. Morgan Chase, Mr. Fuld of Lehman and Mr. Blankfein of Goldman Sachs for their personal involvement last summer -- without pointing out that the damage had been done months and years earlier, and that the noise from those august institutions was that of billions of barn doors being closed.
The Journal even noted the massive personal sacrifice of Mr. Blankfein who "cancelled plans to spend the last two weeks of August at his beach house, missing a chance to spend time with his sons before they headed to college."
What the Journal also fails to point out is that Mr. Cayne may very well have a different management style than his peers. Can it be that he'd rather portray an image of coolness and confidence in the midst of relative chaos, as opposed to the PR-tuned micro-management of Blankfein et.al? That he saw no need for that kind of gestural bullshit?
Disclosure notice: I own a few hundred shares of Bear Stearns. And frankly, as a shareholder, I'd rather have a CEO who has a team he can trust in place, and who doesn't need to be chained to his desk.
I wonder if the Journal's Kate Kelly just doesn't like Mr. Cayne, period. His macho cigar and golf lifestyle probably isn't hip enough for her. I'm sure that if he had taken time out from the sub-prime mess to ground himself with some yoga and breathing exercises, had lit some aromatherapy candles in his office to relieve the stress, and decamped to a monastery for some chanting, Ms. Kelly would be celebrating Mr. Cayne for his progressivity, wisdom and perspective in the midst of chaos.
Meanwhile, as the Journal does note, "Bear's travails of late have taken a back seat to those of competitors like Merrill Lynch, where a write-down of $8.4 billion cost chief executive Stan O'Neal his job."
And that was written before Chuck Prince lost his gig, too.
To which I say: pass me a Cohiba.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.