iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Adam Roberts
 

Let Them Eat Cake (Why Junk Food Is OK For Kids, In Moderation)

Posted: 05/09/11 12:58 PM ET

According to the C.D.C., "childhood obesity has more than tripled in the past 30 years." As a New York Times Op-Ed piece stated in 2008: "Tens of millions of young people will be at risk of illness and death unless this country commits to reversing, not just stabilizing, this epidemic."

Michelle Obama has become the nation's fiercest advocate on this front and let me begin by saying that I fully support her efforts and the health community's efforts to teach kids how to eat and exercise properly.

This post isn't about that.

This post is about a different sub-set of children, children who live at the opposite extreme; children whose parents forbid them from eating anything processed or commercial: The No Candy, No Cake & No Soda Generation.

Having lived in Park Slope, Brooklyn for several years, I observed some of these children. Fed on a diet of yogurt and alfalfa sprouts, their faces were wan, their eyes were hollow. These were children who'd never experienced the joys of a root beer float, a slice of rainbow-sprinkle covered birthday cake or the tongue-prickling delight of a box of Nerds.

On Halloween, these children are cloistered from other children, corralled and forced to exchange their miniature Hershey bars and Nestle crunches for carrot sticks and edamame. It's a sad sight to see.

And though I may be exaggerating, slightly, I do think denying children any junk food is cruel and unusual parenting, an extreme measure that will have negative consequences down the road.

For starters, your child will be an outcast. On a school trip, for example, when Melvin Stevens (Grade 8) starts passing out jelly beans and your child, let's call him Maxwell Peterson (Grade 7), protests that "jelly beans are filled with chemicals and additives and give rabbits cancer" not only will children stare at him in disbelief, at the next rest stop, Melvin will flush Maxwell's head down the toilet.

Things only get worse in college. Having been denied junk food his entire childhood, Maxwell will spend his freshman year experimenting with Twinkies and Fritos, spiraling downward his sophomore year on a steady diet of M&Ms and Cheetos. By the time he's a junior, Maxwell will be that guy at parties, passed out in a corner with a Mountain Dew-filled syringe hanging off his arm.

And all because his parents thought they were doing him a service. But it's the same problem children face whose parents forbid them from watching R-rated movies, from reading "Brave New World" or from listening to Kanye's new album. These kids, the moment they're set loose in the world, explode like a rocket: all that pent up energy and confusion and desire erupts like a geyser, and instead of an emotionally balanced, healthy child, you have a sex-crazed, drug-fueled, junk food junkie.

Heed my advice, then. Give your kids candy, soda, cake--all of it--but in moderation. Explain to them that this stuff is really bad for them and that it's way better to eat fruits and vegetables. Offer them homemade alternatives: make a cake with good ingredients, bake a pie with fresh fruit, or offer up homemade granola bars (or just granola.) Exaggerate the work and the thought and care that went into the homemade stuff, and they'll begin to favor that over the cheap stuff you can buy at any neighborhood gas station.

But because they're allowed to have it, they won't glamorize junk food as something forbidden and, therefore, something worth attaining. It may seem counterintuitive to feed your kids something that you don't want them to eat; but only by de-mystifying it can you be assured that they won't turn to it when they get older.


* * * * *


Adam Roberts is the creator of the award-winning food blog, The Amateur Gourmet, now in its 7th year. In addition to hosting three web shows for Food Network online, Roberts is the author of "The Amateur Gourmet" (Bantam/Dell) and is currently writing a cookbook for Artisan Books. You can find him on Twitter at @amateurgourmet.

 
According to the C.D.C., "childhood obesity has more than tripled in the past 30 years." As a New York Times Op-Ed piece stated in 2008: "Tens of millions of young people will be at risk of illness an...
According to the C.D.C., "childhood obesity has more than tripled in the past 30 years." As a New York Times Op-Ed piece stated in 2008: "Tens of millions of young people will be at risk of illness an...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 354
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HerrMonk
Fighter, Trainer, Nat.Sec.Consultant, Libertine
11:11 AM on 05/17/2011
The parents you were talking about are clueless about nutrition and are the "raw food vegan" types...

No one needs to eat processed junk, but that hardly means denying yourself (or your kids) delicious food...
12:42 PM on 05/15/2011
I WAS THAT KID!!! My mother had breast cancer when I was growing up and we believe she was orthorexic (eating disorder involving an obsession with the purity of food) ... I was never allowed any of this stuff and thankfully I've come to understand what all of this meant now that I'm college-age, and I do feel that now I'm prepared to take on my health in a responsible way. But as a child and a teenager I was extremely confused about food which lead to all sorts of eating disorders and problems (I've been extremely underweight and at the higher end of normal in short amounts of time). Parents, teach your kids to understand health...but let them have fun so they can make good decisions later in life. :)
10:49 PM on 05/13/2011
In days gone by, this article would have been called "common sense".

People go to extremes in all aspects of life, and it rarely if ever turns out good.
airmikee99
I can has micro-bio?
05:21 PM on 05/13/2011
ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE POWERS ACTIVATE!

Shape of.... an opinion being passed off as fact!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
01:56 PM on 05/13/2011
If a kid is active, running around all day, why not let them have A treat daily?
But, not too much junk, and they have to burn it off.
05:21 PM on 05/12/2011
Sorry I have a hard time to believe this is not fiction, and not that great at that..
"I observed some of these children. Fed on a diet of yogurt and alfalfa sprouts, their faces were wan, their eyes were hollow. These were children who'd never experienced the joys of a root beer float, a slice of rainbow-sprinkle covered birthday cake or the tongue-prickling delight of a box of Nerds."
05:57 PM on 05/12/2011
And college students on average gain about 9 pounds the first year, hardly because they didn't ear junk food before..
http://medicineworld.org/cancer/lead/9-2005/most-students-gain-weight-during-early-college-years-.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Finnegans Wake
riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shor
11:32 AM on 05/12/2011
How many children are raised with ABSOLUTELY NO exposure to junk food? I mean, even if parents raise them to make healthful choices and eschew junk, I'd still expect those same parents to realize that their kids will likely have a piece of candy or a root beer float now and again. So, what, one one-thousandth of one percent?

"...I observed some of these children. Fed on a diet of yogurt and alfalfa sprouts, their faces were wan, their eyes were hollow."

So the inference I derive from this is that a healthful diet leads to some sort of unhealthful appearance... but eating sugary foods (albeit now and again) lead children to look and act hale and hearty, with ruddy cheeks and sparkling eyes? Were yogurt and sprouts ALL the children ate?

I went to the supermarket last night for a few midweek purchases (two dairy items, six fresh vegetable items, and organic peanut butter) and every direction I looked I saw future disease. 2-liter sodas, gallon lemonades and iced teas, loaves of white bread, frozen pizzas and microwaveable dinners. The sole concession to real food was a solitary bag of pre-packaged salad and a cardboard-looking tomato.

So, really? We want to push "just a little reasonable sugar" into the Standard American Diet (SAD)?
photo
chamberwindow
Socialism or barbarism.
10:28 AM on 05/12/2011
It all depends on the definition of "moderation." Today, where Americans eat 150 pounds of caloric sweeteners a year, people think moderation is a candy bar a day or 3-4 pieces of cake a week. I don't have children yet, but I was given "moderate" amounts of sugar growing up and it wasn't until I was in my adolescence when I had to go on a diet and lost 70lbs that I realized everyone's mind is warped about what truly is healthy for children. What is interesting is that those children that receive very little sugar growing up tend to be the lean ones when they get older. Sugar is the answer to many of the questions about why our society is falling apart, and why we have an obesity epidemic in 6 month old infants (formula has added sugar these days). It is a lipogenic carbohydrate, one that poor people in this country rely on for daily sustenance, and it's no wonder they are far more likely to be obese and diabetic than the wealthier edamame munchers in Park Slope. Moderation should mean birthday parties, Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas, and Easter. If they want something sweet, eat an apple! Also, home made is only slightly better, sugar is sugar.
07:04 AM on 05/12/2011
Good that you mentioned home made alternates that, while maybe junk as well, are controlled by you. I remember a relative being shocked that I let my son eat home made cake for breakfast (and I always reduce fat by subbing in applesauce). I reminded her that she'd let her kids eat Dunkin Donuts donuts that same day. Both are low on the "good choice" scale, but I think it is better to not go to the bottom of the scale.
06:29 AM on 05/12/2011
I want to agree with you, and I tend to hold to the "all things in moderation" mantra. However, many junk foods are addictive. You're not so much giving the child a choice, then, as letting addictive chemicals make it for them. I'm sure this can be remedied with good parenting, but that means sometimes affirmatively denying junk food. Sometimes, not always.
05:12 AM on 05/12/2011
Cheddar Jalapeno Cheetos are the best Cheetos ever, they beat out the flamin hots which are just flavorless hot dust sprinkled on Cheetos plus the green flecks glow bright fluorescent green under black lights. Still trying to figure out how they accomplished that as none of the jalapenos I've seen glow as eerily as those I find in the Cheddar Jalapeno Cheetos.
02:33 AM on 05/12/2011
Great comments. I wanted to reply, but the computer didn't let me (took forever to "load").


"This post is about a different sub-set of children, children who live at the opposite extreme; children whose parents forbid them from eating anything processed or commercial: The No Candy, No Cake & No Soda Generation."

Adam Roberts should expect these critical replies, because he refuses to mind his own damn business. While it is his First Amendment right to be a jerk, he shouldn't be surprised by this response when he sticks his nose where it doesn't belong.

Parents are doing the best that they can for their children, and if they aren't abusing or mistreating their children, or telling them lies about the world, they should be able to raise their kids as they see fit, based on the research that they are doing. If they want to keep junk food, video games, television, etc. out of their house, then there is a good reason for doing so.

Nobody is telling him how to raise his kids. Nobody said "Hey, Adam Roberts, I think your kids are eating too many jelly beans! We are going to police what you do in your own home."

Health-conscious people, vegetarians, vegans, gluten-free dieters, etc. are busy enough trying to obtain healthy meals for their own families, and could care less about policing Adam Roberts' diet. Yet if you write articles that demean them and their kids, they will heap criticism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LindyK
02:21 AM on 05/12/2011
Very well said. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stonemann
To argue with an idiot, can mistake you for one.
01:51 AM on 05/12/2011
There are no bad foods, only bad eating habits. Therefore, it's not about the foods you eat, it's about the foods you eat all the time. I've had folks tell me about experiences similar to this, good article.
03:16 AM on 05/12/2011
You do not know about what you are writing. It is the type of food you put into your mouth that harms you. Do some research and then rewrite you silly comment. Go to you tube and listen to the video “Sugar the bitter truth.”
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
09:31 AM on 05/12/2011
I wish you hadn't written that. You left nothing to my imagination either.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stonemann
To argue with an idiot, can mistake you for one.
12:14 PM on 05/12/2011
I know exactly what I'm writing. So Bryon, you mean to tell me if you were on the verge of starving to death and you happen by chance to stumbled across a pack of M&Ms, those M&Ms wouldn't save your life, or would you not eat them, since there the wrong type of food?
04:36 AM on 05/12/2011
'There are no bad foods, only bad eating habits.' Lol, if only it were true! Back in our grandparent's or great grandparent's day, this may have been the truth. Sugar and fat were the nasty culprits to avoid. Nowadays the toxic, and often bioaccumulative, chemicals laced into foods -especially junk foods- are a serious cause for concern. MSG(in salty processed foods like crackers and soups) and aspartame (diet Coke, sugar free candies, light yoghurt and more) are neurotoxic and should NEVER be eaten. Sodium benzoate (common preservative in soft drinks and other processed goods) combines with vitamin C to form BENZENE in the bloodstream, and often, in the product itself. There is a list of cancerous to likely cancerous additives(due to human and animal studies) that would shock anyone willing to do the research. BHA, BHT, TBHQ, rBST, BGH; these are all cute little acronyms for toxic waste that is allowed in our food in the U.S. Feeding this crap to children is unforgiveable. Let them eat cake, sure. Just make it yourself with fresh organic ingredients and some free-range eggs. :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stonemann
To argue with an idiot, can mistake you for one.
03:09 AM on 05/13/2011
It is true, psucarrierae, not unless you’re telling me that eating a fatty cheeseburger with fries once a month is no different than eating the same meal every day; that you will get just as fat and unhealthy either way since you’re eating that food. Our grand and great grandparents didn't see sugar and fat as nasty culprits to be avoided. Although they consumed on average 3 to 5 pounds of sugar per year, since cane sugar was hard to come by, they consumed on average 18 pounds of butter per year and animal fat comprised up to 83% of their diet, and they had no prevalence of heart disease. You mention the MSG and carcinogens put in our foods, so you’re telling me someone will keel over from eating a container of yogurt or can of soup, when these same foods could save your life if you had nothing else for you to eat? Be thankful you’re in a position to be in control of your nutrition, half of humanity still isn’t. Trust me, if you were in that group, fresh organic ingredients would mean nothing because everything would be on the menu.
photo
AgathaX
Pro-science; anti-using-the-world-as-one-big-lab.
10:59 PM on 05/11/2011
As my second (and last) child has gotten older, I've become increasingly lax about what I let him eat, and he gets skinnier and skinnier. It just doesn't seem like a fight worth having when the doctor brags about how fit and healthy he is. One thing that I think helps, is that we never made a habit of getting combo meals or fries when we ate fast food. We only get the items we want--even if it would only be 10 cents more (or less!) to have some other item thrown in. I do not routinely get chips or soda to keep at home. I wait for him to ask. I do not insist that he have supper if he is not hungry. I think this contributed to my own excess weight as a teen. I came home and sneaked snacks and then ate my whole dinner to hide that I had been sneaking snacks.

At the end of the day however, its largely his personality. He stops eating when he feels full. He won't eat deserts just because they are there if they are not his favorites. Actually, the same for almost any food. If it's not exactly what he wants, he won't eat it. It's annoying, but it does seem to keep the weight off.