iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alan Black

GET UPDATES FROM Alan Black

The Patriot Game -- Time to Build a U.S. National Soccer Stadium

Posted: 07/05/11 09:34 PM ET

Give me liberty or give me... Megan Rapinoe singing "Born In The USA" after scoring a stunner against Colombia last weekend in the World Cup in Germany. This followed the team saluting U.S. soldiers stationed in the country, who showed up to support the team in the 3-0 victory that took the USA through to the upcoming quarter-finals.

U.S. soccer is serving up some choice splashes of spontaneous patriotism not available via the country's bigger sports. Singing the national anthem at every game during the baseball, basketball and football season reduces that patriotic moment to a predictably dull whoop when "the land of the free" hits the high note. American teams versus American teams, there's little chance of USA! USA! breaking out as it did last year when Landon Donovan's last second winning goal against Algeria in the 2010 World Cup shot millions of Americans into an unselfconscious explosion of national joy. Smart, the Women's team are. Rapinoe's rendition of The Boss's classic anthem spread through the tubes of the Internet, suddenly everyone at home knew the USA was playing in the World Cup. As the team progresses, more viewers will be tuning in to witness our women winning, beating the world at the world's game. Some dour critics expressed negative comments about the team's choice of celebration -- get with it chumps -- the World Cup is all about national pride, which is not the same as political nationalism. That's what makes it so damn powerful and popular!

By contrast, the Men's team endured the unsettling reality of facing Mexico in last week's Gold Cup Final in Los Angeles with 80,000 Mexican fans cheering on El Tri. Outnumbered 8 to 1 in the stadium -- why so few American fans? This was a big game, an important beacon. Few soccer teams endure such a fate -- the home game that feels like playing away. It is not good for morale, or results. Mexico won.

So, it is high time for a national soccer stadium to be built with red, white and blue cement. A public works, patriotic project that everyone could get behind. A place for U.S. soccer to call home. Maybe New York, possibly Washington or Philadelphia, start the debate. Put an end to the endless wandering all over the country to different fields, the gypsy team. Settle our national teams down in one place and after a generation the seats will be filled with home fans drowning out the visitors. U.S. Soccer can take control of the ticket sales. Two to us, one to them. Visitors are always welcome but it is our house, our decoration, our place of pride. USA! USA! Call your senator. They buy patriotism at the right price. Winning.


 
 
 

Follow Alan Black on Twitter: www.twitter.com/footyheader

 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
01:20 PM on 07/11/2011
If American fans cared enough about soccer, stadiums full of Mexican fans would not be a problem.

But we don't. And why should we; watching a bunch of wimps faking injuries in the hope of drawing a penalty is not something Americans do. We like baseball, football, basketball and hockey. Even in those sports, the government should NOT be spending money building stadiums. It certainly should not do so in the case of a foreign sport like soccer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YeahDonkey
So are you saying I have a small bio?
02:22 AM on 07/12/2011
Over 60, white, votes Republican most of the time. No passport.

If you keep sticking your head in the sand your going to miss some great moments in the history of American sports.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YeahDonkey
So are you saying I have a small bio?
02:24 AM on 07/12/2011
and Fox watcher
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:43 AM on 07/11/2011
Non-issue and a fundamentally misinformed column.

CONCACAF is a regional tournament, they want the stadium to be someplace that non-Americans can easily reach (and sell out).

U.S. World Cup qualifiers against Mexico, you notice, are never played in L.A., because we know that will be a pro-Mexico crowd.

New York, Philly and Washington already have stadiums. So does Seattle. And Chicago. And Columbus. All places the U.S. National team can get very partisan home crowds. There is no need to spend money (that we mostly don't have) on something we don't need.

And "Put an end to the endless wandering"? WHAT? You notice America is a somewhat large country, and 90% of the fans couldn't get to a 'National Stadium' by train in a few hours like they could for someplace like Wembley, right? Of course we're going to play in more than one venue, we have fans in more than one time zone.

Welcome to U.S. Soccer though, now that you're following it maybe you can get up to speed.
12:40 AM on 07/11/2011
Good luck. Republicans won't let it happen. Money needs to be used for wars and tax breaks for the rich instead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
01:21 PM on 07/11/2011
If being a Republican means no money for billionaire sports team owners, then sign me up...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:26 PM on 07/10/2011
really bad idea
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dgoshilla
03:21 PM on 07/10/2011
On paper its a good idea but let's think realistically. When you have a US v Mexico match you need a much different stadium then when you have a US v Cuba game. I had the idea of having 8 stadiums on rotation. You pick 4 larger stadiums such as Quest Field and 4 smaller stadiums such as Red Bull Arena or other MLS SSS and rotate the bigger and smaller matches between them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YeahDonkey
So are you saying I have a small bio?
02:20 PM on 07/10/2011
National Stadium in the United States? Terrible idea.

Where would you put it? In the middle of the country? How many seats would it hold? Who would use it when the US wasn't playing World Cup qualifiers( which is only a handful of games every four years)?

This country is too big for a National Stadium, this isn't Mexico where you have one GIANT city in the center of the country. Do you really think there aren't going to be any Mexican/Honduras/Costa Rican fans in the midwest? Really?

We have soccer specific stadiums all over the country now, why would you deprive great US fans the opportunity of watching their National team play? What about the weather? I don't want to play teams we know we can beat in crappy weather conditions, it only helps the lesser team( don't want to play Canada in a snow storm, don't want to play Trinidad in 100+ degree heat).

US Soccer had nothing to do with the location of the Gold Cup final, that was a CONCACAF decision and they knew they would sell the most tickets at the Rose Bowl.

We must remember the tactical positives of having stadiums all over the country ( just ask Mexico when they are playing their World Cup qualifier in 20 degree temps).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SonnyBono
Cogito ergo sum ​​liberalis
04:29 AM on 07/10/2011
The US should build a national soccer stadium??????? And, pray tell, who should foot the bill? The average US taxpayer already pays for all or significant portions of the sports palaces in the US - Jerry Jones's new playpen in Texas has huge amounts of taxpayer dollars that will never (NEVER!!!) be paid back regardless of how many Super Bowls old Jerry wins and he is not the only one. Dodger Stadium was build with private funds BUT the city seized the land under the guise of building public housing and then gave it to the Dodgers for a song. This does not include the cost to the taxpayers for public access - freeway off ramps so the McCourts and their kind can charge ten bucks for warm beer. Way too much public funds are spent on building stadiums and arenas for billionaires and their teams.

I have a radical idea - any community or governmental agency that wants to throw public funds at private professional sports teams should do two things first - A. Explain why this form of socialism is acceptable and B. Prove to the public that all ESSENTIAL services like education, police, fire, roads, infrastructure, etc. are all fully funded and at a level that truly reflects what this country should be providing for its citizens.

Here's another wild idea - let all the real soccer fans in America - all 52 of them - dig into their own pockets and pay for this boondoggle themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YeahDonkey
So are you saying I have a small bio?
02:07 PM on 07/10/2011
Waaaaahhhhwaaahhhwaaaa, my lord why don't you send some of your misguided uninformed rage to the people who deserve it.

The public money spent on the soccer specific stadiums in the United States is tiny compared to the rest of the sports in the US.

just 52 soccer fans in the United States eh?

Gold Cup Final.......92000 +
Average attendance for the Seattle Sounders 37264
Average attendance for the LA Galaxy 23067

You truly have no idea what you are talking about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SonnyBono
Cogito ergo sum ​​liberalis
04:54 AM on 07/11/2011
From where I am sitting - it would appear that the people "who deserve it" got the message. My point was not that we should not spend public funds on soccer stadiums BUT that we should not spend any public funds on stadiums or arenas for professional teams - football, baseball, basketball, hockey, team tennis or soccer. If building an arena or stadium does so much for the general welfare of the population - let the private sector build the damn thing instead of going to the local or state governments for corporate socialism.

Ok, so I was wrong about the 52 soccer fans in America but I'm sure that I'm still pretty close. (Understand the concept of sarcasm, anyone?)

As to your attendance figures - Gold Cup final - 92,000 in attendance with about 91,850 who were there supporting the Mexican team - the balance - reporters who had to be there and a handful of American team supporters. Don't know about the Sounders but when the LA Dodgers only draw 23,000 plus at the Ravine - the McCourts file for bankruptcy. The greater LA area has over 11 million people and the Galaxy averages 23,000 WITH David Beckham - pleaseeee - USC football draws more people and they are on probation.

Soccer is not and will never be a dominate sport in America - they will always lag far behind Pro football, college football, arena league football, Canadian football, basketball, baseball, ice hockey, golf, NASCAR, bass fishing, and
08:12 PM on 07/09/2011
I disagree. By building a stadium in LA you will marginalize the east coast fans (and vice versa). I prefer the current method of traveling across the U.S. so that all fans may have an opportunity to watch their national team in action. Besides, just because you build your stadium in a single location, it doesn't stop opposing fans from filling it up. Everyone knew that the CONCACAF championship game was going to be in the Rose Bowl. Mexico simply has a more devoted fan base. Also, plenty of teams do not have a national stadium (Spain and Australia to name two big ones.) We are not that unusual.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SvrWx
Eileen, toora tooluri Eh..
07:56 PM on 07/09/2011
Soccer is boring. And where would we build a "National" stadium? D.C.?
08:16 PM on 07/09/2011
Yet it is the most widely played sport in the U.S. I'm a die hard Ravens fan, but I still love watching soccer. It has a completely different atmosphere. Also, if you read the post, he lists a couple different locations. I wish people like you wouldn't click on soccer stories just to criticize the sport. It's weird.
07:32 PM on 07/09/2011
Even if they built a national stadium in LA. There would have been the same fan ratio at the Gold Cup final. There are plenty of adequate stadiums in the US. M&T Bank Stadium(Baltimore Ravens) has hosted numerous Euro friendly matches
06:51 PM on 07/09/2011
American fans don't go to US-Mexico games because they don't want to be pelted with coins, batteries, beer, food, bags of urine, toilet paper, and insults. And that's just in the parking lot.
07:23 PM on 07/06/2011
I disagree.

1. This is a big country, and I want to see my national team play every once in a while. I can't afford to hop on a plane every time I want to see the national team play. Even small countries like the Netherlands split home matches (friendlies, Euro/WC qualifiers) between cities like Amsterdam, Eindhoven, and Rotterdam.
2. US Soccer/CONCACAF care about money. They don't care what fans come. 90K is 90K. If they wanted a pro American crowd, they would have gone to Columbus or Kansas City.
3. I think the National team should more around MORE. LA/NY/Washington/Philly seem to get the majority of the matches, and the city with the largest MLS fan base (Seattle) hasn't seen the national team since 2009 Gold Cup.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YeahDonkey
So are you saying I have a small bio?
02:19 PM on 07/10/2011
Seattle plays on turf, you can't have WC qualifiers on turf.
01:01 PM on 07/06/2011
We need SOMETHING to have a home field advantage, no doubt.
09:58 PM on 07/05/2011
It should be built in St. Louis. St. Louis is richer in soccer history than any other city in the U.S. and was long the home of the sport before it got "cool" on either coast. Too long has soccer ignored this classic home.

Further, it's centrally located so people from either coast can travel to it easily (the same cannot be said about LA, DC, NY, etc.)

Lastly, and think before you call this racist or anything else, unlike NY, LA or Washington DC, the population has not been overwhelmed by recent immigration (which I think is GREAT for the U.S. as a country, just terrible for homefield advantage in soccer) to prevent another embarrassment like what happened in the recent Gold Cup.