More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alan Schram

Alan Schram

Posted: March 28, 2010 09:57 PM

Where Did Inflation Go?

What's Your Reaction:

For those concerned about incipient inflation resulting from the gargantuan monetary expansion we had over the past 18 months and the budget deficits we are still running, the lack of inflation is confounding.

One explanation is that the Consumer Price Index is inaccurate and misleading. For example, a third of the consumer price index is Owners' Equivalent Rent, an artificial addition put into the CPI in 1980. In the go-go years of housing, real estate prices were up much more than the Owners Equivalent Rent, and the actual cost of living went up by about 7%. The CPI did not reflect that.

Remove housing costs from the CPI, and inflation is back. In January the CPI was up 5.8% on an annualized basis, excluding owners-equivalent rent.

Another important explanation is that historically, inflation lags growth in the money supply by at least a year. By that measure, we should expect inflation by the end of 2010.

This happens because in a recession, demand falls and business activity declines. Businesses cut prices and reduce their borrowings. The Fed expands the money supply aggressively as a way to counter the recession. Inflation is the result of money supply growing at a higher rate than the goods and services in the economy.

Right now commodity prices are starting to rise again, and it seems businesses are done lowering prices. The economy hasn't caught up yet with the past decline. The slack left over from the recession is keeping inflationary pressures in check. This is why inflation lags.

During the early stages of the business cycle, government deficits actually coincide with lower interest rates. Currently, the Federal Reserve set short term interest rates at almost zero. But this is temporary.

Companies have become much more lean and competitive with the wave of streamlining that was forced on them by this deep recession. And as the economy begins to recover, both business and individual borrowing will increase, putting upward pressure on interest rates and fueling inflation. And if low interest rates trigger higher housing prices, inflation will be demonstrably higher.

It isn't all bad. Higher inflation might shrink the mountain of debt: Nonfederal government debt, now about $27 trillion, is almost four times as large as federal government debt (about $7.2 trillion).

After all, it worked before. In 1946, post World War II, US national debt was 122% of GDP. Ten years of 4% average inflation later, it was half that.

Inflation seems subdued now, but in light of the political constraints facing Social Security, Medicare and other entitlement spending, it is an inescapable certainty. At some point we will have to deal with the pernicious effects of a credit system flush with cash. Either we sharply reduce the growth in government spending or witness a steep rise in inflation.

Alan Schram is the Managing Partner of Wellcap Partners, a Los Angeles based investment firm. Email at aschram@wellcappartners.com.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
04:10 PM on 03/29/2010
Nobody feels rich enough to want more stuff and less money. Everyone feels poor enough to want more money and less stuff. (Even if "stuff" includes risky financial assets.) Under those circumstances the Fed can pour as much money into the economy as they feel like, and not much will happen -- either in terms of causing inflation or in terms of stimulating demand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TrekBear
12:27 PM on 03/29/2010
Inflation fears are generally overblown. The government and Federal Reserve stimulus efforts largely replaced the nominal amount of money "lost" in the financial collapse - the paper value of assets, not the real value of assets used for CDOs, CDSes, and other fraudulent instruments. By 2012, these efforts will mostly be wound down and the private sector and general public will resume their roles as the primary economic drivers.
12:11 PM on 03/29/2010
The quantity theory of money represents and predicts inflation differently than the classic “too much money chasing too few goods.” The quantity theory of money is generally better regarded than the old views. But yet here is an economist (the author) who has an obvious political goal to advocate: “Either we sharply reduce the growth in government spending or witness a steep rise in inflation.”

I find it very telling how the author doesn’t use the most advanced understanding of inflation (or, how about just blatantly writing a misleading article), ignores many of the corporation practices helping to foster inflation, and ignores many of the possible market reforms that can help reduce inflation.

I’m tired of being lied to. I don’t mind when someone puts forth an argument but at least provide a reasonable background.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
11:27 AM on 03/29/2010
Funny, everything I buy is more expensive. But I only buy things like gasoline and food and we don't count those.

And don't get me started about Toilet Paper! When did it get so freaking expensive?
01:06 PM on 03/29/2010
Large portions of the world have never, ever seen toilet paper. Count your blessings.
11:10 AM on 03/29/2010
Great. Let's reign in gov't expenses. Let's start with the author: halt Social Security, Medicare and health insurance payments to people who don't need it i.e. rich economists.
11:10 AM on 03/29/2010
I'm not sure where there is no inflation, or deflation, but I notice "luxury" name-brand shoes and watches prices are risen dramatically. I have always got them at budget sites or locations such as Marshalls, Sierra Trading Outlet, where those prices have shot up.

Also definitely food has gone up in cost.
11:00 AM on 03/29/2010
Bought any groceries, gas, electricity, water service, cable TV, telephone, internet, health care, home repair products, car insurance, license fees, paid any financial service fees or paid any taxes lately?
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
11:24 AM on 03/29/2010
Yes I have, and if the price is not higher, the package is smaller.
10:52 AM on 03/29/2010
I remain more worried about deflation.
11:55 AM on 03/29/2010
Are you, by any chance, living in an alternative universe where McCain was elected President?
10:30 AM on 03/29/2010
03.25.2010 US public debt 8.2T, Intra-Gov 4.5T (US Treas. Dept)

100 bases points on just the Public debt = 82B

How can they use monetary policy to counter inflation ?

Have we painted ourselves into a corner ?
10:06 AM on 03/29/2010
I agree with most of the comments posted. People don't have the money to spend. As employment increases, and people start spending again, there will be some inflation. The Fed will control it by increasing interest rates. They can also reduce the supply of money in circulation by selling Government Bonds. (Lowering their price).
09:36 AM on 03/29/2010
Inflation occurs when too much money chases too few goods. Who has too much money now? Giant quantities of money have simply disappeared as banks de-leverage and investments go broke. That ought to be pretty obvious.

I assume those now boosting the notion of inflation do so for some political reason that makes more sense to them than it ought to. Something like, "Accusing Democrats of fostering inflation with too much spending always worked in the past. That means we're on the verge of inflation now."
09:55 AM on 03/29/2010
Those who don't fear the possiblity of inflation in the current climate of exponential growth of the monetary base, and illiquid assets on the FED's balance sheet have no idea what they are talking about.
11:10 AM on 03/29/2010
Is that a Greenspan quote? I think somebody thinks they know what they are talking about, but it just ain't so!
11:50 AM on 03/29/2010
the growth in the money supply didnt occur in a vacuum...it occured to counter crippling deflation.
10:53 AM on 03/30/2010
Giant quantities of money didn' t simply disappear; those Everest-sized mountains of dough shifted to other owners. There is a difference.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iblogleft
Certifiable
08:43 AM on 03/29/2010
The money would have to get into the average consumers hand for those inflation numbers to spin up.

When money is printed and goes straight into the bankers economy, nothing changes for the consumer.

Everyone is asking for more money for things, but the only people getting it are those in captive markets like gasoline, electricity and food.

You could have just said, "They were wrong."
07:44 AM on 03/29/2010
The simple fact of the matter is there is little inflation because people are not buying stuff, they are worried about the economy, jobs etc.
07:17 AM on 03/29/2010
Either we sharply reduce the growth in government spending or witness a steep rise in inflation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These two have nothing to do with eachother. Government spending does not cause inflation. And you are manageing a hedge fund? Go figure.
08:39 AM on 03/29/2010
Not directly but indirectly defecit spending DOES cause inflation. I assume the reason you are really mad at the author is because he is bashing your beloved central bank, Alexandria Hamilton. We need another Aaron Burr.
09:17 AM on 03/29/2010
it is sometimes claimed that monetization of government debt, i.e. using the printing press, causes inflation. but government getting into debt is not the cause of inflation.
and sure, if you are running out of arguments you eliminate the opponent. that's the american way with a very long tradition.
12:00 PM on 03/29/2010
Not government spending, per se, of course, but government *deficit* spending does increase inflationary pressures. And, as noted in the article, inflating away national debt as a percentage of GDP is a technique that has long been applied in the US and elsewhere. I've been expecting it ever since the bank bailout was announced under Bush.
07:14 AM on 03/29/2010
Stupid headline. Stupid question. But, hey, it comes from Wall Street wannabe, Schram. Why not check grocery prices we pay? Why not check gasoline prices we pay? Oh, that's right. Schram operates in fake economy. Not the real economy. You know, the corporate welfare economy.