Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alan Singer

Alan Singer

Posted: March 21, 2011 03:13 PM

New York State Teachers Fight Back


Teachers' unions now face decertification and an end to collective bargaining in Wisconsin and Michigan. In Wisconsin, the governor and legislature passed legislation ending collective bargaining rights for public employees. In Michigan, the governor was empowered to take over financially troubled local governments and schools and cancel labor contracts.

Teachers' unions are also being pressed by massive cuts in education budgets in a number of other states, including New York. In New York City, the mayor is using the threat of 4,600 layoffs to spur a campaign to mortally wound the union by ending seniority rights. He has received support from wealthy foundations and even wealthier hedge-fund operators who see breaking the teachers' unions as a major step toward privatizing education and turning schools into for-profit institutions.

In New York State, NYSUT, the New York State United Teachers, the umbrella organization representing local teachers' unions, is responding with a major preemptive campaign to rally teachers, students, parents, and communities to oppose the budget cuts. The campaign began with a television ad campaign declaring, "New York's schoolchildren should not suffer deep budget cuts so millionaires can enjoy tax breaks." The ad concludes with a little boy angrily scolding a corporate executive, "You need a time out!" According to the ad, the proposed state budget calls for a $1.5 billion cut in school funding and a $1.2 billion cut in taxes on wealthy New Yorkers.

NYSUT is also sponsoring a series of rallies as part of its "Educate New York State" campaign against proposed cuts in the education budget. On March 15, there were rallies in Albany, Syracuse, and Binghamton and on March 16 in Yonkers, Buffalo, Albany, and Watertown. Rallies are also planned for Rochester, Brooklyn, the Bronx, Manhattan, Queens, Staten Island, and Port Jervis. On Thursday March 24, a massive turnout is expected for a rally scheduled for Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York where I teach. The rally is set for 6 PM in the student athletic facility.

In recent conversations I have had with parents and newer teachers, many had little sense of how the teachers' union helped establish teaching as a profession and improve conditions for students. They also had little idea what conditions will be like if the union weakens.

Many young teachers, as well as the general public, do not understand the origin of the great disparity in pay between beginning teachers, in New York City the starting salary is $45,000 a year, and long term veterans who might earn over $100,000 a year. The Bloomberg Administration has been using this disparity in its campaign to lay-off veteran teachers in the next round of budget cuts and keep supposedly "excellent" cheaper new teachers.

The teachers' unions did not create this unfair pay scale. When I started teaching in 1971 in New York City there were eight steps to maximum salary. Today New York City has an additional five longevity steps, the last after 22 years of service, before reaching maximum pay. During the 1970s and 1980s, instead of granting raises in a period of double-digit inflation, the city added the longevity steps and promised teachers that if they accepted salary freezes and minimum increases in the present they would be paid in the future. Now Bloomberg and the city want to get rid of veteran teachers so they do not have to make good on what was promised in the past.

Newer teachers, and workers in other industries, need to realize that if seniority protection is removed for teachers everyone becomes vulnerable once they have a little experience and command a higher salary. Instead of removing union protection from teachers and other civil service workers, it needs to be extended to all workers in the private and public sectors.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 68
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
12:38 AM on 03/25/2011
Whiles reading this article, I slowly began to fume with anger. It dawned on me that the mayor of New York does not care a bit about the education, because if he really did he would not try to threaten the teachers union with 4,600 layoffs. The answer for all the questions given by them is" America is on the verge of being broke". Is America really broke?. If the government can spend a lot of money on weapons in defending a country due to their own selfish gain, why can't they do that for their own citizens. Each day i baffle at each issue that arises on matters affecting our economy and how its not solved immediately. I sincerely pray for a change.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:32 PM on 03/24/2011
Mayor Bloomberg is extremely conniving. He has displayed the message of, "Out with with the old in with the new." to the people. When in actuality its "Out with the expensive (veteran teachers) and in with the inexpensive (beginning teachers)." but that is still only scratching the surface of Bloomberg's ulterior motives. His true motive is "OUT with the people who are aware of my plans (veteran, high paid teachers/NYSUT/UFT)-- the people who increase probability of my failure and IN with the unaware teachers (Beginning, low-paid teachers), who do what they are told and have no influence in failure in my plan, because they are oblivious to the obvious." This is utterly diabolical, immoral and unethical. I mean, how can one person actually devise a plan to eradicate a group of aware people and justify their actions by saying the budget cuts are the result of too many highly paid teachers?? I just don't understand this. The potential 4,600 layoff of teachers is a transformation of public schools into private schools for the lucky, and those who are financially stable. Who does this benefit? Well, Its investors. But, whose education will it diminish? Impoverished adolescent minorities, such as myself. This leads to my next question: If Bloomberg laid off the politically aware teachers (veterans), what would happen to the new teachers once they have been educated by the NYSUT about their states' political motives on March 24th? I wonder.. -Vaughn Mesquita
03:04 PM on 03/24/2011
I think that Bloomberg is making a terrible mistake. Of course we all realize that, and I am only pointing out the obvious. The fact is that we need education for everyone. Where would we all be without it? Where would Bloomberg be if HE didn't have education? If he would put himself in our shoes, he would be the one to fight back, and it's enough. He just wants to make New York a state for people who can afford living here and unless he wants to end up like George Bush, when everyone hated him, he should realize that he is tearing this place apart.
11:13 AM on 03/24/2011
It's a horrible thing to see your future slip away. To see your options slowly taken and replace with a growing sense of dispair that engulfs and drowns you. THAT is what some of us who grow up in the 80' and 90's saw but, then we had hope (for a little while). Now like last time we are given the choice between getting a substandard education that leaves us with no real options for an academic future to just joining the work force hoping to work hard enough to pay for education we deserve verses the one we were given. Hoping that no more opsticles are put in our way. Hope is both wonderful and terrible. What hope do we give the future? Those children that hopefully one day take our place and make the world better. Without the teachers that care and give Hope. Without those that give their time to better others and in some small way better themselves? What happens to a business that does not plan for its future? It fails. It always fails. I would think that our major (with all his business experience) would see his city his business failing. The QUALITY education of our children is our investment for the future. STOP the cuts. Tax the rich who already have enough..... sorry I forgot Bloomberg is part of the rich. Why help those who that right now can only give hope?
EN1(SW/EXW) Miguel Sanchez USNAVY
09:41 AM on 03/24/2011
"Education seems to be in America the only commodity of which the customer tries to get as little he can for his money."__Max Leon Forman
The time that we live in is one of extreme difficulty for the poor class Amerians. Public School students such as myself should be given money, not have it taken away. I definitely agree with the actions taken by the teachers, and students who are fighting against what Bloomberg wishes to happen, that is removing experienced teachers and cutting BILLIONS of dollars from public school funds, which is truly atrocious.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:13 AM on 03/24/2011
Its despicable and unreasonable to dismantle education (or anything for this mater) just for greed. Veterans are needed within every work environment not only because of their prolonged knowledge of the system, but also to assist newcomers in becoming settled in their new work environments. Especially in teaching whereas there are multiple approaches which would need to be taken for a proper connection with students. When it comes to this, sometimes it takes pure experience but always, and still experience.
07:31 AM on 03/24/2011
Bloomberg definitely wants to have control on the educational system and taking down the teacher unions would do that for him. Cutting 1.5 billion on school funding is not helping the students in new york city we are already struggling as it is. Privatizing schools is not good way in helping our education system because some people can't afford that, and then 1.5 billion cut in taxes for the wealthy new yorkers where is the fairness in that. Something has to changed or things are going to get alot worst.
01:27 AM on 03/24/2011
The fact that this is happening says a lot. To be honest privatizing school will only allow people who can affod it and those who cant will be uneducated. What is their main goal exactly? What do they really want. Things are already bad as it is and things arent going the way people has plan well for the middle/ poor class anyway but for the rich you can say something different.
11:32 PM on 03/23/2011
Why is it the fact that we live in two completely different economic worlds never talked about! These plans for privatizing school and making them for-profit is just genius, just because of the fact the real plan behind it is written in black and white! Privatize schools, and who ever can afford them will allow their children to receive a quality education while the rest are brought up on the idea that all they'll ever be good for is to work maintenance or join the army! It's just amazing..... the perfect world where the rich live beautifully like the kings and queens they claim themselves to be while the rest struggle as if our lives depended on them.... funny thing about that is we already do and will even more as the days, months, and years go on because we are still in the dark and blind to see the difference between reality and a dream. "A $1.5 billion cut in school funding and a $1.2 billion cut in taxes on wealthy New Yorkers", where is the fairness in this.... tax-breaks are given to the rich and powerful while the poor struggle to get the basic necessities such as food, REALLY!
11:30 PM on 03/23/2011
This budget cuts are actually nonsense facts because how can we think that they're concrete because there's no money. There IS money and we know where it is. But, since we are not the ones who have to go to these thieves and many other billionaires companies, how can we solve this. The ones who should be dealing with this, trying to get the money they owe us, are standing neutral and that is the worst part. On the other hand, firing teachers is the most complicated idea that the DOE has brought up. It's true that they're some veteran teachers that are not working as the way they're supposed to, but they some teacher which the experience make them the best teachers of a school. But trying to find a way to chose which are the enough capable teachers is the big deal that maybe wouldn't work because a test doesn't define how is the capacity of a teacher same as one day of supervision doesn't mean how good or bad is a teacher during a whole-year school session. But again, our job is just fight for it but to be realistic without the action of our representatives and/or governors are the ones with the actual control and power but, a nation can do more than one individual.
11:14 PM on 03/23/2011
Hi my name is Jeremy Santana and I am an eleventh grader in the bronx. Reading this article i was infuriated. How are we supposed to learn. How is my little brother going to learn if there are no teachers to teach him. Im sure that if the mayor were in my position he would not stand for this injustice. I am not scared to say what i need to say,the people of the bronx should not be scared either. I speak this way because i am tiered,tiered of the abuse minorities of new york have to go through. I can not sugar coat it any more,some thing has to be done before its to late.
11:06 PM on 03/23/2011
Another Brilliant article Mr. Singer, at this point, I realize that the only purpose that Bloomberg has, is to increase their profits and destroy people, I have to say the truth, I prefer a cut of Billions from Wall-street's pocket and a raise in school budgets, than a cut in school budgets, and Billions in their pockets. We are facing a "BLOOMing" plan, while they're sitting in a "BERGere". And this is not the worst that they can do, this is the only thing they think of doing, little by little, if we don't step up, we'll be destroyed... But obviously, we are facing them.
10:20 PM on 03/23/2011
Reading this article makes me wonder what is the DOE is thinking? 4,600 layoffs? Teachers are trying to educate the youth so they can become important adults in this society and the DOE instead of praising teachers their making them their target. It's just rediculous the DOE needs to get things together. I actually wanted to go to college to become teacher but learning how unfair the DOE is making things for teachers I am defiantly second guessing it. Imagine me changing my dream to become a teacher I wonder how many others decide to do the same. I will hate for my generation and the generations that follow me to be effected by the DOE's decisions that seem not be will thought out well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:29 PM on 03/23/2011
When it comes to education, there are apathetic people who really just shrug it off and doesn't cease it's value, and integrity. I can't speak for the NYDOE as a whole, cause I know there are people that care about our education, and more so, the people who provide it for us, but it seems that they are very consistent with using their money on highly redundant issues. They have absolutely no problem wasting millions on distractions and diversions, but when it comes to funding the teachers who ultimately teach the future generations how to do what is necessary, they pretend that it's not a problem, that the money is better 'used' elsewhere. I can't comprehend the fatuity of our government anymore, and I realize now why it's crucial that we unite to stand against the cuts and layoffs.
08:01 PM on 03/23/2011
This whole system is run by wealthy foundations that funds our politics so that they can change laws etc. So that they can benefit and one day be in charge of all the decisions. For example privatizing education so they can be own by corporations. They cut a lot of public fundings but going after the unions is something that has to be stopped because our jobs wont be secured as the wealthy and that will get us into depression.