Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alan Singer

Alan Singer

Posted: October 26, 2009 02:18 PM

Obama, Duncan and the Public Schools

What's Your Reaction?

I find numerous similarities between the Bloomberg regime in New York City and the Obama Administration in Washington DC, especially in their attitudes toward teachers and public schools. Obama sends his children to private school. Bloomberg sent his daughter. Both Obama and Bloomberg value smarts and believe the key to success is smart management. Neither seems to value actually knowing something about the issue or job or real life experience.

The people who haven't won the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, rebuilt the economy, or delivered on national health care, are now ready to clean up the education mess and they have found an easy target -- schools of education.

Arne Duncan, Obama's basketball pal from Chicago and the educator-in-chief, who was never a teacher and apparently never worked with children or in schools in any capacity, is going to revamp public school education by overhauling the schools of education. Duncan is demanding "revolutionary change" so teachers are better prepared to work with kids with high needs and to use data-driven assessment to improve instruction (don't they already use data-driven assessment to manage industry, banks, and their wars so successfully?).

Before I go any further, in the name of openness and honesty, I am one of the targeted professors of education that Duncan and Obama apparently want to shake up. I guess, I am the problem.

On the other hand, I taught in some of New York City's more difficult schools for fourteen years before becoming a teacher educator -- middle school in District 19 (East New York), and Thomas Jefferson, Charles Evans Hughes, and Franklin K. Lane High Schools.
I am not a fan of professors of education who profess, but have little or no experience in schools. Even while based at Hofstra University, I spend at least two mornings a week working with teachers in public schools. Most of these schools have large minority populations with many high needs children. But changing schools of education is going to change very little.

Duncan wants states and school districts to "link the performance of teachers to their education schools" so they can identify which programs prepare teachers well and which ones don't. He claims he talked to hundreds of great young teachers while serving as Chicago schools chief and they had two complaints about education schools. They said they did not get the "hands-on teacher training about managing the classroom that they needed, especially for high-needs students" and were not taught how to use data to improve instruction and boost student learning." Curiously, just the answers he was looking for.

Also, not surprising answers from middle-class teachers who are grappling with the culture shock of teaching in inner-city communities with little support from school administrators.
The first problem with the Obama/Duncan plan is that nothing short of experience in schools is going to prepare middle-class aspiring teacher education students to work with students and communities that have high social and academic needs. Even if they understand and empathize with the students, it takes three to five years of hard work to develop the judgment to become an effective teacher in any setting, let alone in hard-pressed urban and minority schools. No one can be inoculated to become a successful teacher while in a teacher education program. Change will require ongoing support and training for teachers while they are working and much smaller classes. These revolutionary changes will be much more expensive than futile attacks on schools of education and local, state, and federal governments have been unwilling to spend the money.

They are also unwilling to make the investment in improving conditions in the lives of students. Increasing numbers live in poverty with little hope for the future, despite Obama's election and fine speeches. If Obama and Duncan want to improve schools they will need to rebuild neighborhoods, provide jobs, and help to stabilize families.

The United States has a capitalist economy. Businesses try to make a profit. Governments are concerned with the bottom line. Why don't our schools work better? It has little to do with schools of education. The reality is that it is cheaper to import car mechanics from Jamaica and Pakistan and computer technicians from India and China than to improve conditions in U.S. inner cities and provide students with real educations.

I agree with Obama and Duncan. Our schools need revolutionary change. We just believe in different revolutions.

 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:17 PM on 10/27/2009
It's a sad thing to see really, the fact that our education system; or what is left of it, is in the hands of those who do not only lack the caring for the education of this nations children but who also lack the skills to affect the needed change. That the education of my generation has been left to those who only see this as a day to day business; something to make an immense profit from. The whole reality of this is that Obama and Duncan are the ones who are making the education system an even greater problem, not the defenseless students who dont know how to work the system to their advantage and dont know the difference between being conditioned into believing something and actually learning it. By not seperating money hungry capitalism and the public school system, Obama and Duncan are denying their people of a greater education by decreasing job opportunities, leaving neighborhoods old and abandoned instead of putting the money into rebuilding them and leaving the economy to Wall Street brokers so that they can better it for their personal interests and leaving our middle class citizens to fend for themselves. And all for the sake of importing, by what ever means, cheap labor, to start giving back to those oh so generous CEO's who secretly supported Obama during his run for the presidency; which by the way, this method is so much cheaper than actually investing and caring about our future education.
01:33 PM on 10/27/2009
As a former student of Dr. Alan Singer and a product of the Hofstra School of Education, I cannot describe the invaluable teaching and preparedness I received from Hofstra and it is apparent in my eight years as a Social Studies teacher in a low-income school. However, what is baffling to me is a friend of mine that attends Mercy College teacher program, whom has passed courses with high grades by attending the classes half the time and has described to me the utter simplicity of the courses and the “flexibility” of the professors. Yet the school boast the fact that Obama elected a teacher from that program as Educator of the year. Experience is by far the only way to learn to teach at any level of education but I fear that if this trend of training business people to run schools similar to corporations continues education in the US will deteriorate taking the entire country with it. In Japan the CEO's majored and are experts in their respective fields here in the US our CEO's are Business majors as apparent in the failing American auto industry. Are we seriously going to allow this to happen to our system of education?
09:08 AM on 10/27/2009
Back in the day when women were precluded from pursuing the heights of business and the professions -- many of those best and brightest were funneled into the classroom -- became teachers and generations of kids benefitted (notwithstanding the societal mechanism that brought that about).

Today, there are fewer such barriers, and the schools of education are by necesssity taking in most to apply. It's quite public that the current generation of ed school graduates have among the lowest SAT scores of many professions. Programs like Teach for America and others -- must move out society to view the teaching profession --as a profession on par with (or above) lawyering and investment banking. Only then will we really be able to attract the best and the brightest into the teaching profession. And that effort needs to be accelerated now.
04:18 AM on 10/27/2009
Department of Education Secretary Duncan thinks that Schools of Education should be held accountable for student achievement.

If so, American Schools of Education deserve praise, not scorn. If the role of poverty is taken into consideration, American children do very well in international comparisons.
The late Gerald Bracey pointed out that U.S. schools with less than 25 percent of their enrollments made up of children of poverty outscore all other countries in math and science. American children only fall below the international average when 75 percent or more of the students in a school live in poverty.

The obvious reason: The results of many studies confirm that the characteristics of poverty, hunger, poor diet, toxins in the environment, and a lack of reading material seriously affect academic performance. The United States has the highest level of childhood poverty of industrialized countries.

As Prof. Singer notes, poverty is beyond the control of Schools of Education. Low scores on international tests are the fault of a society that allows so many children to live in poverty.

Also, if we are to apply Secretary Duncan's logic, we should hold schools of business and departments of economics accountable for the current economic crisis.

Stephen Krashen
12:08 AM on 10/27/2009
There IS a problem with Obama's Duncan attempting to overhaul the nation's schools' of education! What the hell do THEY know about teachers and the lives they lead in the classrooms of America?