Obama's Law: The Future of The Supreme Court -- here's the full story on Scoop44.
The President's Supreme Court Short List: Merrick Garland, Elena Kagan, Pamela Karlan, Harold Koh, Deval Patrick, Sonia Sotomayor, Kathleen Sullivan, Cass Sunstein, David Tatel, Kim Wardlaw, Diane Wood -- Woman Nominee A Near Certainty, According to Most SC and Obama Followers
SCOOP44 asked the nation's foremost legal scholars: Based on the initial appointments of Eric Holder as Attorney General, Elena Kagan as Solicitor General, and Cass Sunstein as Director of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the White House's current political posture, and the President's own constitutional law:
(1) What specific reversals of legal policy do you anticipate from the Bush years, (2) What new policies will be implemented swiftly, and (3) What signal is the President sending about potential Supreme Court nominees he would consider?
Interviews with Harvard's Tribe and Tushnet, NYU's Revesz, Yale's Greenhouse and Carter, UVA's White, American's Wermiel, Pepperdine's Kmiec, Georgetown's Lazarus and Barnett, Indiana's Hoffmann, Attorneys Millett and Casey, Chapman's Eastman, and Texas's Powe.
Tribe: 'A cautious and pragmatic course' to change recent constitutional law
(Lawrence Tribe, Professor at Harvard Law School)
Revesz: 'Top-flight legal talent' expected with many good options
(Richard Revesz, Dean of NYU Law School)
Greenhouse: Quick movement on legal doctrine reversals: 'regulatory agencies that really regulate'
(Linda Greenhouse, Lecturer at Yale Law School, Former NYT Supreme Court Correspondent)
White: Kagan and Sunstein picks are possible stepping-stones for judgeships, 'Obama most knowledgeable president about the Court since Nixon'
(G. Edward White, Professor at University of Virginia Law School)
Wermiel: Measured change in affirmative action, civil rights enforcement, immigration prosecutions, national security powers, federalism case / Likely SC appointments would be 'moderate progressive justices - more like Breyer and Ginsburg than like Brennan and Marshall'
(Steve Wermiel, Associate Director of Marshall-Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project at American University College of Law)
Kmiec: Obama DOJ more concerned with 'professional ethic' than political polarization / 'Legal rethinking' could affect executive privilege, state secrets, future dismissal of US Attorneys.
(Douglas W. Kmiec, Professor at Pepperdine University School of Law)
Lazarus: Holder, Kagan, and Sunstein are 'three very different people' / Anticipates 'less profound shift' in 'theoretical reach' of executive authority
(Richard Lazarus, Professor at Georgetown Law)
Tushnet: Actions 'likely to be driven by larger political considerations'
(Mark Tushnet, Professor at Harvard Law School)
Barnett: 'Less reluctant to appoint an academic'
(Randy Barnett, Professor at Georgetown Law)
Hoffmann: Illinois collaborative work suggests Obama's 'exceptional' legal acumen / Already new rules 'to protect labor movement' / One 'powerful intellect': Pamela Karlan, Stanford Law Professor and Director of SC Litigation
(Joseph Hoffmann, Professor of Law at Indiana University's Maurer School of Law)
Millett: 'Massive amount of new legislation' to revive economy is opportunity for regulation
(Patricia Millett, Partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP)
Carter: A few big changes and 'quibbling over details'
(Stephen Carter, Professor at Yale Law School)
Casey: SC appointments are like 'speculating on who will win the Oscar for best picture...only the Academy knows'
(Lee Casey, Partner at Baker Hostetler)
Eastman: Bets on part-Hispanic Clinton appointee Kim Wardlaw
(John C. Eastman, Dean of Chapman University School of Law)
Powe: Obama pressed to appoint a woman / confidence in outsider appointment familiar with understanding of 'the country and how things work'
(Lucas Powe, Law Chair at the University of Texas)
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.