iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alexander Nicholson

Alexander Nicholson

Posted: October 9, 2010 12:17 PM

Tonight, White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett will deliver remarks to the annual dinner of the Human Rights Campaign in Washington, DC. While the Human Rights Campaign does not speak for or represent the gay military community, Jarrett will no doubt deliver assurances to the gathered crowd that President Obama and his staff strongly support the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) -- the outdated law that continues to make the lives of many gay troops a living nightmare. After her remarks, the crowd of 3,000 will no doubt reward Jarrett with thunderous applause and administration officials will once again think that it has appeased those who have been hounding the administration for its failures and inaction on DADT this year. And the administration will once again be wrong.

Servicemembers United, the nation's largest organization of gay and lesbian troops and veterans, has thrown down the gauntlet with this latest attempt at appeasement. The days when grand gestures made at black-tie galas with no meaningful follow through are over. The days of appeasement speeches in front of the least-critical organizational voice in town are gone. Those who are actually serving under the cloud of DADT each and every day, and those who have actually been harmed in very real ways by this discriminatory law, want to be heard by this administration. And they want to be heard now.

Servicemembers United has asked that Jarrett at least also meet with a group of gay veterans before her gala appearance tonight to have a respectful but substantive dialogue about getting DADT repealed. Despite growing blog and media coverage of this request, the White House has so far been silent. And it's not just that they're not hearing the request -- they seem to have gone into one of their characteristic "communications lock-down" modes.

The White House has gone into communications lock-down mode before, primarily when it is being heavily -- but legitimately -- criticized and it wants to punish the critics by ceasing all engagement with them for a period of time. If this strikes the American public as funny and petty, it should, especially since the White House has an entire office dedicated to "public engagement." What are our taxpayer dollars funding in this operation if the "Office of Public Engagement" is refusing to engage affected constituencies at all at critical times? And isn't it even more ironic that Jarrett herself holds the official title of Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs!

As for Valerie Jarrett, the audience she owes a real speech to is not the one she will stand in front of tonight. It is those who sweat and toil around the clock to make sure that she continues to enjoy the freedom to snub them with another hollow appeasement attempt, as well as the committed veterans who are actually working and sacrificing day in and day out to ensure that the interests of their active duty brethren are looked out for. That audience, it is certain, will not be in attendance tonight.

 

Follow Alexander Nicholson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dadt

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:16 PM on 10/14/2010
Per my post from a few weeks ago, President Obama is merely doing his best to pretend to be powerless. He could have eliminated DADT with the stroke of a pen (just as Truman did to desegregate the military). Waiting for assessments of impact or Congressional approval is nothing more than a lack of leadership and conviction.

My article is here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-steven-friedman/obamas-dont-blame-me-poli_b_735457.html
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Jdaddy1951
08:56 PM on 10/09/2010
I hope they enjoy the dinner. It's pretty obvious that President Obama and his staff do NOT understand the urgency of doing away with DADT now.
04:48 PM on 10/09/2010
@Alexander: As great as Servicemembers United is, it is not the only organization representing or speaking for gay servicemembers. If you have a beef with HRC fine, but that does not give you claim to all gay servicemembers. If your beef is with President Obama and his administration and your obvious distaste/disgust with the lack of any substantial progress on DADT fine, but don't in turn denegrate an organization that has worked on behalf of all gay people and has existed more than a decade before SU was founded. It's safe to say, I think, that all fair-minded people are pretty pissed-off with the treatment this administration has given the gay community, but it will take all groups and organizations, working in whatever way makes them most effective, to change the law. I applaud SU for all the hard, in-your-face work they're doing on behalf of gay servicemembers and their loved ones, just don't tarnish all that good work with bitter divisiveness. I hope that Valerie Jarrett will speak to you and I hope that she is met with the respect her position deserves. And if she does not, my next question is..why won't the audience you represent be there to hear her remarks? -Diane
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djonan
07:09 PM on 10/09/2010
Clearly you don't understand the issues...but comments are fun!!!!!
10:10 PM on 10/09/2010
Clearly I do, what I don't understand is why we as a community have to cut each others throats to get anywhere. Maybe the present administration has given us more than we realize, when was the last time we were this fired up and set in motion?
12:30 PM on 10/09/2010
It will be interesting to see Obama try to successfully win reelection in 2012 (assuming he runs) without the support of the LGBT community. Obama seemed committed to alienating every group and demographic who supported him in 2008.
03:54 PM on 10/09/2010
Lol, exactly. You can list almost every core constituency of the Democratic Party and he's gone out of his way to disrespect them: Women, LGBT, Environmentalists, Latinos, Progressives. I still can't get any of the 'bots to tell me who it is they expect to save them at election time if not these groups.
Ifeomamn
When MSM report Facts, USA thrives.
06:15 PM on 10/09/2010
Just as FRD was accused back in his days. Those seeking for all our problems to be solved in 20 months are seeking for a pound of flesh.

Today, FDR is appreciated.

Granted pres Obama is not FDR. I don't like to compare presidents that way. My analogy is to show that Liberals, progressives, lefties love to eat their own.
Ifeomamn
When MSM report Facts, USA thrives.
06:11 PM on 10/09/2010
Senator Obama received over 69M votes in 2008. How may of those were from LGBT community, African Americans, Jewish community, women group, Hispanic community, Catholics, White men, etc?

Per month, 50K Latinos turn 18yrs. This demographics alone is the fastest in the nation.

"(assuming he runs)"

It burns me when we think we are more than we are. I am speaking in terms of our respective communities.

Can we speak the truth and stop the hyperbole?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LeftLeanWing
Ah.. I said..Ah Said I said... Proceed Guv'nah
11:47 AM on 10/10/2010
It's a favorite passTime here on HP.....
And HP Encourages It.......